Hemodynamic Effects of Cold Versus Warm Fluid Bolus

NCT ID: NCT03209271

Last Updated: 2017-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-03

Study Completion Date

2017-05-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fluid boluses are often administered with the aim of improving tissue perfusion in critically ill patients. It is unclear whether the temperature of the fluid has an impact on the hemodynamic response. The aim of this study is to describe the hemodynamic effects of a fluid bolus with two different temperatures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized, controlled, cross-over study in 21 healthy volunteers. The participants will receive a fluid bolus of 500 ml Ringer's Acetate at either 22°C or 38°C over 15 minutes in a randomized order. Non-invasive measures will be made of cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart and pulse rate, saturation and temperature. Hemodynamic measure will be made using the Clearsight® system. Measurements will be made during 120 minutes. The second session will take place at least one day later, and the participant will then receive the other fluid temperature.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Temperature Change, Body Hypovolemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Crossover study of 2 different temperatures of crystalloid fluid bolus.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Unblinded (unable to blind subjects)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Body temperature fluid

500ml Ringers Acetate infused over 15 minutes warmed to 38°C

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ringer's Acetate (warm)

Intervention Type DRUG

Body temperature fluid

Room temperature fluid

500ml Ringers Acetate infused over 15 minutes cooled to 22°C

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ringer's Acetate (cold)

Intervention Type DRUG

Room temperature fluid

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ringer's Acetate (warm)

Body temperature fluid

Intervention Type DRUG

Ringer's Acetate (cold)

Room temperature fluid

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ringer-Acetat Baxter Viaflo, ATC B05BB01 Ringer-Acetat Baxter Viaflo, ATC B05BB01

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Volunteers 18 years or older Previously healthy

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 2 or above.
* Known pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christer Svensen

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maria Cronhjort, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wall O, Ehrenberg L, Joelsson-Alm E, Martensson J, Bellomo R, Svensen C, Cronhjort M. Haemodynamic effects of cold versus warm fluid bolus in healthy volunteers: a randomised crossover trial. Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Dec;20(4):277-284.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30482135 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPN 2016/986-31/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mild Hypothermia in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT00987922 COMPLETED PHASE2