Person-Centered Psychosis Care: An Educational Intervention
NCT ID: NCT03182283
Last Updated: 2018-11-08
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
100 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2014-04-25
Study Completion Date
2018-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that presents in young adulthood and affects \~1% of the population. Impact on affected persons life is often major and life expectancy is reduced by \~20 years. Better and more effective care models are needed to increase health in these persons. Person-centered care have been suggested to be one way to increase efficiency in care delivery for patients with chronical and complex conditions. The impact of person-centered care on a inpatient psychosis care setting is now being tested.
The purpose of this study is to test whether inpatient Person-centered psychosis care (PCPC) can
1. increase patient empowerment
2. improve patient satisfaction
3. reduce the frequency of involuntary treatments
4. reduce the duration of inpatient care and
5. reduce overall ward burden
A further purpose is to qualitatively explore which components in this complex intervention are experienced as facilitators or barriers to the achievement of good care, from both patient, next-of-kin and staff perspectives.
Quantitative data is collected through questionnaires from patients (measuring empowerment, care satisfaction and perceived health) before and after an educational intervention for staff, along with ward level measures such as care burden, number of involuntary treatments and length of stay on ward.
Qualitative interview is used to study experiences of patients, next-of-kin and staff.
The purpose of this study is to test whether inpatient Person-centered psychosis care (PCPC) can
1. increase patient empowerment
2. improve patient satisfaction
3. reduce the frequency of involuntary treatments
4. reduce the duration of inpatient care and
5. reduce overall ward burden
A further purpose is to qualitatively explore which components in this complex intervention are experienced as facilitators or barriers to the achievement of good care, from both patient, next-of-kin and staff perspectives.
Quantitative data is collected through questionnaires from patients (measuring empowerment, care satisfaction and perceived health) before and after an educational intervention for staff, along with ward level measures such as care burden, number of involuntary treatments and length of stay on ward.
Qualitative interview is used to study experiences of patients, next-of-kin and staff.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Psychoeducation on Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Individuals With Schizophrenia
NCT05259748
Schizophrenia
COMPLETED
NA
Psychoeducation in Patients Who Diagnosed With Schizophrenia
NCT04280835
Quality of Life
Well-Being
Compliance, Treatment
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Psychoeducation Focused on Reducing Internalized Stigma
NCT06347848
Schizophrenia
Treatment Adherence
Stigma, Social
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
The Effect of Mindfulness-Based Psychoeducation Programme Given Individually to Schizophrenia Patients on Internalised Stigma and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours
NCT06882538
Schizophrenia Disorders
RECRUITING
NA
The Effect of Psychosocial Skills Focused Group Psychoeducation in Schizophrenia Patients
NCT06872424
Schizophrenia Patients
Psychoeducation
Functional Status
+2 more
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background
Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that presents in young adulthood. It affects approximately 1% of the population and is a major cause of Disability-adjusted Life Years worldwide. Besides impacting on the ability to independently carry out daily activities, work/studies and interactions with family and community, the illness has a profound effect on physical health. Diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are common complications and life expectancy is reduced by as much as two decades. The long term nature of this complex illness highlights the need for more effective, holistic care models. Increased patient involvement is central, as it has been shown that patients' views of appropriate interventions often differ from those of formal care providers.
Person-centered care (PCC) is recognized by the WHO as a valuable approach to the care of chronic conditions. A basic assumption of person-centered care (PCC) is that healthcare must recognize the patient as a person, with own knowledge, capacity and preferences along with needs and problems. The PCC way to deal with illness and disease is to form a partnership with the person and together form a plan of action to increase health (i.e. not only focus on symptoms or signs of diagnosed disease) taking into account the person's context and priorities. Previous studies show that persons with serious mental illness can and want to participate in their own care and participation might increase adherence. Improved social function and consumer satisfaction were demonstrated when a person-centered care approach, Integrated Care (IC) was tested in a psychosis outpatient-based randomized controlled trial.
To the best of the authors knowledge, PCC has yet to be tested in an inpatient setting for persons with severe mental illness. Favorable results have been demonstrated with regard to both ward level and patient level outcomes from inpatient settings within somatic care. Person-centered care in geriatric settings, which might share some common issues with hospital care for persons with schizophrenia (decreased cognitive function, lack of insight, compromised autonomy), have shown positive outcomes for QoL and agitation in patients and job satisfaction for staff. Reviews show mixed results though. Thus, we wanted to evaluate an intervention for inpatient psychiatric care for persons with schizophrenia and similar psychoses. To this end, we developed Person-centered Psychosis Care (PCPC), a staff educational intervention involving components of PCC as well as IC. Person Centered Psychosis Care was defined as having four key elements; dialogue, building partnership, formulation and documentation of a health plan, and early involvement of the patient's outpatient facility. The latter means that the patient's outpatient-based social resource group can come into play already during the inpatient stay.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to test whether inpatient PCPC can
1. increase patient empowerment
2. improve patient satisfaction
3. reduce the frequency of involuntary treatments
4. reduce the duration of inpatient care and
5. reduce overall ward burden
A further purpose is to qualitatively explore which components in this complex intervention are experienced as facilitators or barriers to the achievement of good care, from both patient, next-of-kin and staff perspectives.
Methods
The study employs a simple "before and after" design. Quantitative data (patient-level, ward-level) are collected pre- and post intervention on all four wards. Qualitative data are provided through interviews with patients as well as focus groups with staff.
Data collection: Patient-level data All patients on any of the four wards who fulfill study criteria during pre- and post-intervention periods will be asked to participate in the study.
Anticipated number of participants: 50 pre intervention, 50 post intervention.Those who accept will complete questionnaires at the clinic together with the interviewer. The following outcomes will be measured:
* Empowerment will be measured with The Empowerment Scale. This scale is validated and used internationally in studies involving persons with severe mental ill-health. There are 28 questions; responses are given on a scale of 1 (agree totally) to 4 (disagree totally).
* Patient satisfaction measured with the UKU-ConSat Rating Scale consists of 11 items on different aspects of the care provided where response is given on a scale 1 (Very bad/negative/little) to 7 (very good/positive/much). The scale also includes two VAS-like scales where an answer is marked on a 100 mm line to a question on overall life experience (0=worst imaginable, 100=best imaginable).
Confounders including illness burden, functional ability, and overall health will be quantified for each patient at discharge. Positive and negative symptom burden will be rated with the Remission subscale of PANSS, consisting of 8 items reflecting core symptoms of schizophrenia and functional ability will be determined using the GAF scale and overall health with the EQ-5D. Ratings will be carried out by two nurses and one psychologist.
After the completion of the scales, all participants are asked the following open-ended questions:
1a) What are the most important things that have improved for you during your stay at the hospital?
1b) What was the reason that you got better? 2a) What do you wish could improve for you in the future, after your hospital stay? 2b) How could the health care sector help you to achieve this?
At the end of the interview, participants are asked for permission for researchers to contact them after discharge for invitation to a qualitative interview study. A purposive selection of stabilized patients who accepted follow-up contact will be asked if they would like to participate in an interview with a study nurse or psychologist. The interview will focus on experiences of care during the inpatient stay and patient-relevant endpoints will be explored. The sampling will aim at a heterogeneous group with regard to gender, age, ethnicity, level of psychosocial function, involuntary vs voluntary care.
Data collection: Next-of-kin A purposive sample of family members or other persons close to the patient will be asked if they would like to participate in focus groups/an interview. The selection of family members' for focus group interview will strive to include next-of-kin of patients with varied backgrounds with regard to age, gender, ethnic background, education level, living situation (do they live together with the patient or not?) etc. The main focus for this focus group will be the identification of positive and negative experiences in the care, discrimination, facilitators and barriers for good care
Data collection: Staff experiences A purposive sample of staff were invited to participate in focus group to collect experiences of the educational intervention and implementation. Facilitators and barriers to implementation of PCPC will be in focus. Staff were recruited through invitation via e-mail and posters on their wards. In a second step section leaders at the wards asked persons who would be on duty on the days of interview to participate. All focus groups are led by an experienced clinician with research experience of qualitative studies. All interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Data collection: Ward level data Mean number of inpatient days, mean number of inpatient days with compulsory care and mean number of involuntary treatment interventions (involuntary injections, medical restraint) for pre- and post intervention periods will be derived from the clinic's administrative database. Overall care burden is measured at each ward with an instrument developed by the Psychosis Clinic for quality monitoring. The instrument includes objective items (number of admissions and discharges, number of involuntary treatments during the shift etc), followed by a subjective item on the overall level of burden perceived during the shift. The form is filled out by one staff member on each ward once a day according to clinical routine.
Data analysis: Quantitative data The main study question is whether the intervention is associated with a change in the degree of empowerment experienced by persons who receive hospital care due to psychosis. The secondary outcome measure is patient satisfaction at discharge. Quantitative ratings before and after the care intervention will be compared with standard statistical methods. Similarly, for the ward level analyses, wardwide outcomes will be compared in wards before and after the implementation of the intervention: mean number of inpatient days, mean number of inpatient days with compulsory care, mean number of involuntary treatment interventions and overall ward burden. Distribution of the variables to be studied will determine whether parametric or non-parametric analyses are employed.
Data analysis: Qualitative data Free text responses to the open-ended questions at the end of the quantitative interview (see patient level data above) as well as data from individual patient interviews and focus group interviews with staff and next-of-kin will be analyzed using content analysis and thematic analysis.
Ethics All participants (patients, next-of kin and staff) are given written and oral information about the study, the voluntary participation, possibility to withdraw from participation without having to give explanation. All will sign consent form before participating in any study related task, a copy of signed consent is given participants. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Board in Gothenburg, Dnr. 773-13.
Time plan Data collection for the pre-intervention phase is completed (December 2014); the educational intervention is completed (May 2015) and the implementation period will end April 30, 2017. Focus group interviews with staff regarding the educational package are now underway (2017). Audit to determine the level of PCPC implementation is currently underway (April 2017), which will determine whether post-intervention data collection could start. Complete data set should be available fall 2017.
Comment on project so far
This is a complex intervention involving action research and the study is registered first after the completion of the educational intervention and on-ward implementation of PCPC. The implementation process has been dynamic and varied at the four different wards involved in the project. The duration of the implementation period was considerably longer than anticipated. This is in part related to high staff turnover, serious lack of psychiatrically trained RNs, as well as other barriers to implementation. Barriers have slowly been overcome by changes in routines instigated from within the care staff (as opposed to being imposed on staff from "above"). While the long implementation process can be seen as a limitation, it's interactive nature can at the same time be construed as a strength, as change from within can be expected to increase sustainable change.
A quantitative study was planned with questionnaires investigating consumer satisfaction and care giver burden in next-of-kin but baseline collection resulted in too few participants to continue that subproject.
Schizophrenia is a major mental illness that presents in young adulthood. It affects approximately 1% of the population and is a major cause of Disability-adjusted Life Years worldwide. Besides impacting on the ability to independently carry out daily activities, work/studies and interactions with family and community, the illness has a profound effect on physical health. Diabetes and cardiovascular diseases are common complications and life expectancy is reduced by as much as two decades. The long term nature of this complex illness highlights the need for more effective, holistic care models. Increased patient involvement is central, as it has been shown that patients' views of appropriate interventions often differ from those of formal care providers.
Person-centered care (PCC) is recognized by the WHO as a valuable approach to the care of chronic conditions. A basic assumption of person-centered care (PCC) is that healthcare must recognize the patient as a person, with own knowledge, capacity and preferences along with needs and problems. The PCC way to deal with illness and disease is to form a partnership with the person and together form a plan of action to increase health (i.e. not only focus on symptoms or signs of diagnosed disease) taking into account the person's context and priorities. Previous studies show that persons with serious mental illness can and want to participate in their own care and participation might increase adherence. Improved social function and consumer satisfaction were demonstrated when a person-centered care approach, Integrated Care (IC) was tested in a psychosis outpatient-based randomized controlled trial.
To the best of the authors knowledge, PCC has yet to be tested in an inpatient setting for persons with severe mental illness. Favorable results have been demonstrated with regard to both ward level and patient level outcomes from inpatient settings within somatic care. Person-centered care in geriatric settings, which might share some common issues with hospital care for persons with schizophrenia (decreased cognitive function, lack of insight, compromised autonomy), have shown positive outcomes for QoL and agitation in patients and job satisfaction for staff. Reviews show mixed results though. Thus, we wanted to evaluate an intervention for inpatient psychiatric care for persons with schizophrenia and similar psychoses. To this end, we developed Person-centered Psychosis Care (PCPC), a staff educational intervention involving components of PCC as well as IC. Person Centered Psychosis Care was defined as having four key elements; dialogue, building partnership, formulation and documentation of a health plan, and early involvement of the patient's outpatient facility. The latter means that the patient's outpatient-based social resource group can come into play already during the inpatient stay.
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to test whether inpatient PCPC can
1. increase patient empowerment
2. improve patient satisfaction
3. reduce the frequency of involuntary treatments
4. reduce the duration of inpatient care and
5. reduce overall ward burden
A further purpose is to qualitatively explore which components in this complex intervention are experienced as facilitators or barriers to the achievement of good care, from both patient, next-of-kin and staff perspectives.
Methods
The study employs a simple "before and after" design. Quantitative data (patient-level, ward-level) are collected pre- and post intervention on all four wards. Qualitative data are provided through interviews with patients as well as focus groups with staff.
Data collection: Patient-level data All patients on any of the four wards who fulfill study criteria during pre- and post-intervention periods will be asked to participate in the study.
Anticipated number of participants: 50 pre intervention, 50 post intervention.Those who accept will complete questionnaires at the clinic together with the interviewer. The following outcomes will be measured:
* Empowerment will be measured with The Empowerment Scale. This scale is validated and used internationally in studies involving persons with severe mental ill-health. There are 28 questions; responses are given on a scale of 1 (agree totally) to 4 (disagree totally).
* Patient satisfaction measured with the UKU-ConSat Rating Scale consists of 11 items on different aspects of the care provided where response is given on a scale 1 (Very bad/negative/little) to 7 (very good/positive/much). The scale also includes two VAS-like scales where an answer is marked on a 100 mm line to a question on overall life experience (0=worst imaginable, 100=best imaginable).
Confounders including illness burden, functional ability, and overall health will be quantified for each patient at discharge. Positive and negative symptom burden will be rated with the Remission subscale of PANSS, consisting of 8 items reflecting core symptoms of schizophrenia and functional ability will be determined using the GAF scale and overall health with the EQ-5D. Ratings will be carried out by two nurses and one psychologist.
After the completion of the scales, all participants are asked the following open-ended questions:
1a) What are the most important things that have improved for you during your stay at the hospital?
1b) What was the reason that you got better? 2a) What do you wish could improve for you in the future, after your hospital stay? 2b) How could the health care sector help you to achieve this?
At the end of the interview, participants are asked for permission for researchers to contact them after discharge for invitation to a qualitative interview study. A purposive selection of stabilized patients who accepted follow-up contact will be asked if they would like to participate in an interview with a study nurse or psychologist. The interview will focus on experiences of care during the inpatient stay and patient-relevant endpoints will be explored. The sampling will aim at a heterogeneous group with regard to gender, age, ethnicity, level of psychosocial function, involuntary vs voluntary care.
Data collection: Next-of-kin A purposive sample of family members or other persons close to the patient will be asked if they would like to participate in focus groups/an interview. The selection of family members' for focus group interview will strive to include next-of-kin of patients with varied backgrounds with regard to age, gender, ethnic background, education level, living situation (do they live together with the patient or not?) etc. The main focus for this focus group will be the identification of positive and negative experiences in the care, discrimination, facilitators and barriers for good care
Data collection: Staff experiences A purposive sample of staff were invited to participate in focus group to collect experiences of the educational intervention and implementation. Facilitators and barriers to implementation of PCPC will be in focus. Staff were recruited through invitation via e-mail and posters on their wards. In a second step section leaders at the wards asked persons who would be on duty on the days of interview to participate. All focus groups are led by an experienced clinician with research experience of qualitative studies. All interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Data collection: Ward level data Mean number of inpatient days, mean number of inpatient days with compulsory care and mean number of involuntary treatment interventions (involuntary injections, medical restraint) for pre- and post intervention periods will be derived from the clinic's administrative database. Overall care burden is measured at each ward with an instrument developed by the Psychosis Clinic for quality monitoring. The instrument includes objective items (number of admissions and discharges, number of involuntary treatments during the shift etc), followed by a subjective item on the overall level of burden perceived during the shift. The form is filled out by one staff member on each ward once a day according to clinical routine.
Data analysis: Quantitative data The main study question is whether the intervention is associated with a change in the degree of empowerment experienced by persons who receive hospital care due to psychosis. The secondary outcome measure is patient satisfaction at discharge. Quantitative ratings before and after the care intervention will be compared with standard statistical methods. Similarly, for the ward level analyses, wardwide outcomes will be compared in wards before and after the implementation of the intervention: mean number of inpatient days, mean number of inpatient days with compulsory care, mean number of involuntary treatment interventions and overall ward burden. Distribution of the variables to be studied will determine whether parametric or non-parametric analyses are employed.
Data analysis: Qualitative data Free text responses to the open-ended questions at the end of the quantitative interview (see patient level data above) as well as data from individual patient interviews and focus group interviews with staff and next-of-kin will be analyzed using content analysis and thematic analysis.
Ethics All participants (patients, next-of kin and staff) are given written and oral information about the study, the voluntary participation, possibility to withdraw from participation without having to give explanation. All will sign consent form before participating in any study related task, a copy of signed consent is given participants. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Board in Gothenburg, Dnr. 773-13.
Time plan Data collection for the pre-intervention phase is completed (December 2014); the educational intervention is completed (May 2015) and the implementation period will end April 30, 2017. Focus group interviews with staff regarding the educational package are now underway (2017). Audit to determine the level of PCPC implementation is currently underway (April 2017), which will determine whether post-intervention data collection could start. Complete data set should be available fall 2017.
Comment on project so far
This is a complex intervention involving action research and the study is registered first after the completion of the educational intervention and on-ward implementation of PCPC. The implementation process has been dynamic and varied at the four different wards involved in the project. The duration of the implementation period was considerably longer than anticipated. This is in part related to high staff turnover, serious lack of psychiatrically trained RNs, as well as other barriers to implementation. Barriers have slowly been overcome by changes in routines instigated from within the care staff (as opposed to being imposed on staff from "above"). While the long implementation process can be seen as a limitation, it's interactive nature can at the same time be construed as a strength, as change from within can be expected to increase sustainable change.
A quantitative study was planned with questionnaires investigating consumer satisfaction and care giver burden in next-of-kin but baseline collection resulted in too few participants to continue that subproject.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Patient-Centered Care
Psychiatry
Inpatient
Psychosis
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Non-randomized before and after design.
Primary Study Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pre-intervention
All patients at the psychosis wards receive care as usual before staff goes through educational intervention.
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Post-intervention
After staff attended educational intervention and implemented Person-centered psychosis care in the wards all patients admitted will receive person-centered care.
Group Type
OTHER
Person-centered psychosis care
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Person-centered care educational intervention for staff with following implementation of person-centered care in the clinic
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Person-centered psychosis care
Person-centered care educational intervention for staff with following implementation of person-centered care in the clinic
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of psychotic illness in accordance with ICD-10
* Medically ready for discharge as deemed by ward psychiatrist
* Medically ready for discharge as deemed by ward psychiatrist
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe cognitive disability
* Lack of basic Swedish language skills
* Lack of basic Swedish language skills
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Göteborg University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Margda Waern, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Göteborg University & Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Anneli Goulding, Phd
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Göteborg University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Psychosis Clinic, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, , Sweden
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Sweden
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rossler W, Salize HJ, van Os J, Riecher-Rossler A. Size of burden of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;15(4):399-409. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.009.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
von Hausswolff-Juhlin Y, Bjartveit M, Lindstrom E, Jones P. Schizophrenia and physical health problems. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2009;(438):15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01309.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tiihonen J, Lonnqvist J, Wahlbeck K, Klaukka T, Niskanen L, Tanskanen A, Haukka J. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet. 2009 Aug 22;374(9690):620-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60742-X.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lasalvia A, Boggian I, Bonetto C, Saggioro V, Piccione G, Zanoni C, Cristofalo D, Lamonaca D. Multiple perspectives on mental health outcome: needs for care and service satisfaction assessed by staff, patients and family members. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;47(7):1035-45. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0418-0. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S, Kissling W. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Oct;114(4):265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00798.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W. Do patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment? Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;162(12):2382-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2382.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(4):219-26. doi: 10.1159/000126073. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Malm U, Ivarsson B, Allebeck P, Falloon IR. Integrated care in schizophrenia: a 2-year randomized controlled study of two community-based treatment programs. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003 Jun;107(6):415-23. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00085.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Malm UI, Ivarsson BA, Allebeck P. Durability of the efficacy of integrated care in schizophrenia: a five-year randomized controlled study. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Aug 1;65(8):1054-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300164.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ekman I, Wolf A, Olsson LE, Taft C, Dudas K, Schaufelberger M, Swedberg K. Effects of person-centred care in patients with chronic heart failure: the PCC-HF study. Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(9):1112-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr306. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Olsson LE, Karlsson J, Ekman I. Effects of nursing interventions within an integrated care pathway for patients with hip fracture. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Apr;58(2):116-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04209.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chenoweth L, Forbes I, Fleming R, King MT, Stein-Parbury J, Luscombe G, Kenny P, Jeon YH, Haas M, Brodaty H. PerCEN: a cluster randomized controlled trial of person-centered residential care and environment for people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Jul;26(7):1147-60. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000398. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brownie S, Nancarrow S. Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1-10. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S38589. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rogers ES, Ralph RO, Salzer MS. Validating the empowerment scale with a multisite sample of consumers of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Sep;61(9):933-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.9.933.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ahlfors UG, Lewander T, Lindstrom E, Malt UF, Lublin H, Malm U. Assessment of patient satisfaction with psychiatric care. Development and clinical evaluation of a brief consumer satisfaction rating scale (UKU-ConSat). Nord J Psychiatry. 2001;55 Suppl 44:71-90. doi: 10.1080/080394801317084437.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, dosReis S, Bridges JF. Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):35-41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090059.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nolte, Ellen, and Martin McKee, eds. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), 2008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ashburner C, Meyer J, Johnson B, Smith C. Using action research to address loss of personhood in a continuing care setting. Illness, Crisis & Loss. 2004;12(1):23-37.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Opler MG, Yang LH, Caleo S, Alberti P. Statistical validation of the criteria for symptom remission in schizophrenia: preliminary findings. BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Jul 24;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-35.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Jun;33(6):766-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Krippendorff, Klaus. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage, 2004.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Goulding A, Wiktorsson S, Allerby K, Ali L, Waern M. Service User and Next-of-Kin Experiences of Psychosis Inpatient Care After a Person-Centred Care Intervention. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;46(2):138-147. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2437429. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Allerby K, Gremyr A, Ali L, Waern M, Goulding A. Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: care consumption before and after a person-centered care intervention. Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;77(6):600-607. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2023.2199726. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Allerby K, Goulding A, Ali L, Waern M. Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: staff experiences from the Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC) project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08008-z.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Allerby K, Goulding A, Ali L, Waern M. Striving for a more person-centered psychosis care: results of a hospital-based multi-professional educational intervention. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02871-y.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Goulding A, Allerby K, Ali L, Gremyr A, Waern M. Study protocol design and evaluation of a hospital-based multi-professional educational intervention: Person-Centred Psychosis Care (PCPC). BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1852-2.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PCPC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Peer-led Psycho-education for Schizophrenia
NCT03246932
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
How Can Rehospitalisations of Patients With Schizophrenia be Avoided? A Comparison Between Different Compliance Programs
NCT00514423
COMPLETED
NA
A Shared Decision-making Training for Inpatients With Schizophrenia
NCT02349880
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Individual Early Psychoeducation Program for Schizophrenic Disorders in Inpatients
NCT05329363
RECRUITING
NA
Evaluation of a Psychoeducation Program for Families Caregivers of Schizophrenic Patients : Randomized Study in Two Arms
NCT03000985
UNKNOWN
NA
Exploring the Feasibility of Social Skills Training in People With Psychosis
NCT02235649
COMPLETED
NA
Brief Hospitalization for Schizophrenia: Strategies to Improve Treatment Outcome
NCT00018837
COMPLETED
NA
Psychological Intervention for Relapse Prevention in First Episode Schizophrenia
NCT00161408
UNKNOWN
NA
Facilitating Engagement in Evidence-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis
NCT04532034
COMPLETED
NA
Attention Shaping Procedures for Improving Psychosocial Skills Among Adults With Schizophrenia
NCT00391677
COMPLETED
NA
Adherence and Quality of Life in People With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder
NCT01769014
UNKNOWN
Enhancing the Outcome of Skills Training for People With Schizophrenia
NCT00069433
COMPLETED
NA
Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training for Youth at Risk of Psychosis
NCT02234258
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of an Interactive Educational Website for Improving the Quality of Mental Health Care for People With Schizophrenia
NCT00312949
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of A Stigma Directed Interventional Program in Schizophrenia
NCT03930225
COMPLETED
NA
Assessment of Efficacy of a Psychological Therapy in Inpatients With a Schizophrenic Psychosis
NCT03316664
COMPLETED
NA
Treatment of Schizophrenia Through Internet-Based Psychoeducation
NCT00051233
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Positive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia (PEPS)
NCT02593058
COMPLETED
NA
Study of the Impact on the Therapeutic Alliance of a Short Initial Psychoeducation Programme in Patients With Early Schizophrenia
NCT04867681
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
The Effect of Psychoeducation Program on Healthy Living Behaviors
NCT05208021
UNKNOWN
NA
Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Schizophrenia
NCT00300651
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
The Effectiveness of Psychosocial Skills Training Applied to Individuals Diagnosed With Schizophrenia
NCT07017881
COMPLETED
NA
Psychometric Validation of an Oral Health-related Scale for Quality of Life and Coping in People With Schizophrenia
NCT03699501
COMPLETED
Shared Decision Making for Antipsychotic Medications
NCT05416658
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
A Remote Life Balance Training Program for People With Schizophrenia
NCT07131137
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA