Neural and Kinematic Features of Freezing of Gait for Adaptive Neurostimulation

NCT ID: NCT03180515

Last Updated: 2019-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-15

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) is an established therapy for the major motor signs in Parkinson's disease, however some patients find that it does not adequately treat their freezing of gait (FOG). Currently, cDBS is limited to "open-loop" stimulation,without real-time adjustment to the patient's state of activity, fluctuations and types of motor symptoms, medication dosages, or neural markers of the disease. The purpose of this study is to determine if an adaptive DBS system,responding to patient specific, clinically relevant neural or kinematic feedback related to FOG, is more effective than continuous DBS on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) and gait measures of PD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Activa PC+S Neurostimulator

All patients will complete motor testing on both continuous DBS and adaptive DBS during a study visit. The UPDRS rater and the patient will be blind to which type of stimulation they are on.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Activa PC+S Neurostimulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Activa PC+S Neurostimulator is approved for both aDBS and cDBS paradigms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Activa PC+S Neurostimulator

Activa PC+S Neurostimulator is approved for both aDBS and cDBS paradigms.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. A diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with bilateral symptoms at Hoehn and Yahr Stage greater than or equal to II.
2. Documented improvement in motor signs on versus off dopaminergic medication, with a change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor (UPDRS III) score of \>= 30% off to on medication.
3. The presence of complications of medication such as wearing off signs,fluctuating responses and/or dyskinesias, and/or medication refractory tremor,and/or impairment in the quality of life on or off medication due to these factors.
4. Subjects should be on stable doses of medications, which should remain unchanged until the DBS system is activated. After the DBS system is optimized(during which time the overall medication dose may be reduced to avoid discomfort and complications such as dyskinesias) the medication dose should remain unchanged, if possible, for the duration of the study.
5. Treatment with carbidopa/levodopa, and with a dopamine agonist at the maximal tolerated doses as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
6. Ability and willingness to return for study visits, at the initial programming and after three, six and twelve months of DBS.
7. Age \> 18
8. Has a history of and/or displays freezing of gait

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subjects with significant cognitive impairment and/or dementia as determined bya standardized neuropsychological battery.
2. Subjects with clinically active depression, defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria and as scored on a validated depression assessment scale.
3. Subjects with very advanced Parkinson's disease, Hoehn and Yahr stage 5 on medication (non-ambulatory).
4. Age \> 80.
5. Subjects with an implanted electronic device such as a neurostimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator or medication pump.
6. Subjects, who are pregnant, are capable of becoming pregnant, or who are breast feeding.
7. Patients with cortical atrophy out of proportion to age or focal brain lesions that could indicate a non-idiopathic movement disorder as determined by MRI
8. Subjects having a major comorbidity increasing the risk of surgery (prior stroke,severe hypertension, severe diabetes, or need for chronic anti-coagulation other than aspirin).
9. Subjects having any prior intracranial surgery.
10. Subjects with a history of seizures.
11. Subjects, who are immunocompromised.
12. Subjects with an active infection.
13. Subjects, who require diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to treat a chronic condition.
14. Subjects, who have an inability to comply with study follow-up visits or study protocol.
15. Subjects, who are unable to understand or sign the informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Helen M. Bronte-Stewart

John E. Cahill Family Profressor, Professor of Neurology and, by courtesy, Neurosurgery at the Stanford University Medical Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Helen Bronte-Stewart, MS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stanford University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford Movement Disorders

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R21NS096398

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Connectomic Guided DBS for Parkinson's Disease
NCT06618157 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
CANadian Adaptive DBS TriAl
NCT05402163 RECRUITING NA