The Effect of AposTherapy on Knee Pain

NCT ID: NCT03171168

Last Updated: 2022-12-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

AposTherapy is a home based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis since patients with knee osteoarthritis have altered mechanics of motion contributing or due to the presence of the conditions. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of ApostTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA). Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of Apos Therapy in patients with significant lower limb arthritis, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in knee OA population.

A potential use of AposTherapy as a replacement for traditional physical therapy may yield a less costly, more effective therapy with better adherence. Problems with traditional therapy include poor patient adherence (patients often do not complete the sessions and have very poor adherence (about 50-60%) to home therapy programs), added cost of travel (which may be more than $100 per session for ambulette or access-a-ride for eligible patients), and the lack of continuation in an ongoing exercise program, leading to relapse and need for retreatment. Additionally, access to physical therapy is limited for many patients since there are not enough available outpatient therapy services to meet the needs of all patients. Finding an alternative exercise program that will increase adherence, decrease total therapy visits, and improve patient's outcomes with decreased dependence on pain medications is a high priority from both patient care and cost management perspectives.

AposTherapy potentially overcomes many of these issues with improving/modifying abnormal biomechanics (therefore decreasing pain), and a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity by promoting perturbation. This biomechanical approach may significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of AposTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate the biomechanical exercise (wearing an appropriately calibrated shoe at home for a prescribed amount of time each day) as a conservative treatment that may supplement or supplant traditional pain medications, interventional pain procedures and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population with knee OA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis Knee Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Gait Analysis WOMAC SF-36 (Short Form 36)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single blinded (evaluator), single-center, randomized controlled trial. Interventional and Control group with option for Control group to Cross over.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcomes assessor is the only one masked in the study. Assessor is independent of the randomization, trial coordination, and care providers.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Traditional Physical Therapy

Participants will have traditional physical therapy up to 20 sessions, up to two sessions per week. This will involve exercise and modalities as decided by the therapists and medical providers. Participants will have a home exercise program for the remainder of the year.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Physical Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Up to 20 sessions of traditional physical therapy

AposTherapy

Participants will have AposTherapy instead of traditional physical therapy over the course of one year. This will include 7 sessions of gait assessment and re-calibration with daily at home exercise with the device over the year.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AposTherapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AposTherapy

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Physical Therapy

Up to 20 sessions of traditional physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients suffering from symptomatic knee OA (uni/bi lateral) for at least six months, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for OA of the knee, and having radiographically assessed OA of the knee according to the Kellgren and Lawrence scale.
* Patients with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of ≥3cm (measured at baseline).
* Males and females between the ages of 40-75.
* 17\<BMI\<40
* Ambulatory and active patients that can participate in a rehabilitation program that includes daily walking
* Stable medical regimen (no recent changes to the pain medication within a month)
* Able to walk at least 50 meters and scored positive on the STEADI test
* Able to understand, read and sign the informed consent form
* English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis.
* Patients suffering from inflammatory joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis.
* Patients with diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the knee.
* Patients with diagnosis of neuromuscular disease.
* Patients with more than 3 falls in the last 12 months, OR any fall with an injury in the last 12 months.
* Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure.
* Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture
* Patients with referred pain in the knees from back or hip joint symptoms.
* Patients with severe back pain, ≥ 4 cm in visual analogue scale (0-10) \[1\] or radiating leg pain
* Patients with generalized body pain (both upper and lower extremities, such as fibromyalgia
* No major surgery to the affected limb and contralateral limb (e.g. no joint replacements or surgical fracture repair)
* No major cardiovascular comorbidities (able to enroll in an active exercise program)
* Patient started on lipid lowering medication in last 3 months
* Any change in blood pressure medications
* No recent physical therapy (no more recent than 6 months) on the affected limb
* No active heart disease (ischemia or heart failure admissions within 6 months) and no active Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (exacerbation within 6 months)
* No active malignancies on ongoing treatment
* Patient with neurological gait pattern
* Patient requiring assistive device during gait analysis.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Apos Medical and Sports Technology Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthew Bartels

Professor and Chairman of Rehabilitation Medicine Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Bartels, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jones KR, Vojir CP, Hutt E, Fink R. Determining mild, moderate, and severe pain equivalency across pain-intensity tools in nursing home residents. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(2):305-14. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.05.0051.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17551881 (View on PubMed)

Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Kuslansky G, Katz MJ, Buschke H. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1761-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020441.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12456852 (View on PubMed)

Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Aloni Y, Teo YH, Teo YS, Das-De S, Yeo SJ. Patients with knee osteoarthritis demonstrate improved gait pattern and reduced pain following a non-invasive biomechanical therapy: a prospective multi-centre study on Singaporean population. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Jan 2;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24383821 (View on PubMed)

Haim A, Segal G, Elbaz A, Mor A, Agar G, Bar-Ziv Y, Beer Y, Morag G, Debi R, Atoun E. The outcome of a novel biomechanical therapy for patients suffering from anterior knee pain. Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23273535 (View on PubMed)

Drexler M, Elbaz A, Mor A, Debi R, Debbi EM, Haim A, Lador R, Salai M, Segal G. Effects of a customized biomechanical therapy on patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 May;55(4):213-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Mar 27. English, French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22521468 (View on PubMed)

Segal G, Bar-Ziv Y, Velkes S, Benkovich V, Stanger G, Debbi EM, Debi R, Mor A, Elbaz A. A non-invasive biomechanical device and treatment for patients following total hip arthroplasty: results of a 6-month pilot investigation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 May 21;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23692690 (View on PubMed)

Forkan R, Pumper B, Smyth N, Wirkkala H, Ciol MA, Shumway-Cook A. Exercise adherence following physical therapy intervention in older adults with impaired balance. Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;86(3):401-10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16506876 (View on PubMed)

Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itala A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, Kalske J, Jarvinen TL; Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) Group. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2515-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305189.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24369076 (View on PubMed)

Abbott JH, Robertson MC, Chapple C, Pinto D, Wright AA, Leon de la Barra S, Baxter GD, Theis JC, Campbell AJ; MOA Trial team. Manual therapy, exercise therapy, or both, in addition to usual care, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized controlled trial. 1: clinical effectiveness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Apr;21(4):525-34. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23313532 (View on PubMed)

Fitzgerald GK, Hinman RS, Zeni J Jr, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L, Bennell KL. OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Design and conduct of clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 May;23(5):803-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25952351 (View on PubMed)

Lim BW, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Sharma L, Bennell KL. Does knee malalignment mediate the effects of quadriceps strengthening on knee adduction moment, pain, and function in medial knee osteoarthritis? A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jul 15;59(7):943-51. doi: 10.1002/art.23823.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18576289 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka R, Ozawa J, Kito N, Moriyama H. Efficacy of strengthening or aerobic exercise on pain relief in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Dec;27(12):1059-71. doi: 10.1177/0269215513488898. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23828186 (View on PubMed)

Skou ST, Rasmussen S, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O, Roos EM. The efficacy of 12 weeks non-surgical treatment for patients not eligible for total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Sep;23(9):1465-75. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25937024 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-4842

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id