Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin in Children and Adolescents (>=10 to <18 Years) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT03170518)
NCT ID: NCT03170518
Last Updated: 2025-04-25
Results Overview
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26 was analyzed using a pattern mixture model with multiple imputation. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
171 participants
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26
2025-04-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Placebo
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
17
|
87
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
Participants Treated From Week 13 Till Week 52
|
17
|
87
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
Participants Re-randomized at Week 13
|
17
|
60
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Participants Not Re-randomized at Week 13
|
0
|
27
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
75
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
12
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Placebo
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Site terminated by sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance with study drug
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by parent/guardian
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin in Children and Adolescents (>=10 to <18 Years) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100 mg
n=67 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Total
n=171 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
14.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=5 Participants
|
14.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2 • n=7 Participants
|
14.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07 • n=5 Participants
|
14.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.02 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
10 - less than (<)15 years
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
15 - <18 years
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement.
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26 was analyzed using a pattern mixture model with multiple imputation. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
|
0.39 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.191
|
-0.37 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.194
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAE was defined as the AEs occurring after first administration of double blind study intervention up to 30 days post last dose of study intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=67 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=17 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
74.7 Percentage of participants
|
76.1 Percentage of participants
|
82.4 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in FPG at Weeks 26 and Week 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=79 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
15.3 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 6.68
|
-11.5 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 6.86
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
19.2 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 6.90
|
-16.4 Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Error 6.98
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement.
The percentage of participants with HbA1c \<7.5%, \<7.0%, and \<6.0% at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: HbA1c <7.5%
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
64.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: HbA1c <7.5%
|
29.3 Percentage of participants
|
69.0 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: HbA1c <7%
|
27.5 Percentage of participants
|
51.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: HbA1c <7%
|
22.7 Percentage of participants
|
54.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: HbA1c <6.5%
|
11.3 Percentage of participants
|
41.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Less Than (<)7.5 Percent (%), <7%, and <6.5% at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: HbA1c <6.5%
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
|
36.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement.
Percentage of participants who received rescue therapy was reported. Participants who met glycemic rescue criteria that is with baseline HbA1c less than (\<) 9.0 percent (%) and greater than (\>) 0.8% change from baseline in HbA1c or with baseline HbA1c \>=9% and \>0.5% change from baseline in HbA1c received the glycemic rescue therapy. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received Rescue Therapy
|
46.0 Percentage of participants
|
11.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who received rescue medication.
Time to rescue therapy was planned to be reported. Participants who met glycemic rescue criteria that is with baseline HbA1c less than (\<) 9.0 percent (%) and greater than (\>) 0.8% change from baseline in HbA1c or with baseline HbA1c greater than or equal to (\>=)9% and \>0.5% change from baseline in HbA1c received the glycemic rescue therapy. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=40 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=10 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Rescue Therapy
|
21.50 Weeks
Interval 2.1 to 45.0
|
24.14 Weeks
Interval 12.4 to 43.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
The percent change from baseline in body weight at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
-0.0 Percent change
Standard Error 0.51
|
-1.6 Percent change
Standard Error 0.51
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
0.4 Percent change
Standard Error 0.69
|
-0.5 Percent change
Standard Error 0.69
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in BMI at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
-0.4 Kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.15
|
-0.8 Kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.15
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
-0.5 Kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.19
|
-0.7 Kilograms per meter square (kg/m^2)
Standard Error 0.19
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
The percentage change from baseline in fasting plasma lipids (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol \[LDL-C\], high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol \[HDL-C\], total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides) at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=76 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: Total cholesterol
|
1.2 Percent change
Standard Error 2.22
|
8.2 Percent change
Standard Error 2.22
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: Total cholesterol
|
5.6 Percent change
Standard Error 2.16
|
5.1 Percent change
Standard Error 2.13
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: LDL-C
|
3.3 Percent change
Standard Error 3.73
|
12.4 Percent change
Standard Error 3.58
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: LDL-C
|
7.5 Percent change
Standard Error 3.57
|
8.3 Percent change
Standard Error 3.44
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: HDL-C
|
1.5 Percent change
Standard Error 2.40
|
6.4 Percent change
Standard Error 2.33
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: HDL-C
|
1.0 Percent change
Standard Error 2.58
|
7.9 Percent change
Standard Error 2.52
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: non-HDL-C
|
1.7 Percent change
Standard Error 2.69
|
6.8 Percent change
Standard Error 2.62
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: non-HDL-C
|
7.7 Percent change
Standard Error 3.02
|
5.0 Percent change
Standard Error 2.95
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: Triglyceride
|
8.6 Percent change
Standard Error 6.32
|
4.6 Percent change
Standard Error 6.28
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Lipids Levels at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: Triglyceride
|
18.2 Percent change
Standard Error 7.17
|
3.4 Percent change
Standard Error 7.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C to HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C to LDL-C ratio at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=74 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C to HDL-C Ratio and Non-HDL-C to LDL-C Ratio at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: LDL-C/HDL-C
|
0.5 Percent change
Standard Error 4.05
|
2.5 Percent change
Standard Error 4.03
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C to HDL-C Ratio and Non-HDL-C to LDL-C Ratio at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: LDL-C/HDL-C
|
-1.5 Percent change
Standard Error 3.20
|
4.0 Percent change
Standard Error 3.13
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C to HDL-C Ratio and Non-HDL-C to LDL-C Ratio at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: non HDL-C/LDL-C
|
1.1 Percent change
Standard Error 3.42
|
3.3 Percent change
Standard Error 3.47
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C to HDL-C Ratio and Non-HDL-C to LDL-C Ratio at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: non HDL-C/LDL-C
|
-1.5 Percent change
Standard Error 3.20
|
4.0 Percent change
Standard Error 3.13
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26 and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=80 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
1.4 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.04
|
0.7 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.04
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
1.5 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.06
|
0.0 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 1.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=80 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
-0.1 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.78
|
-0.1 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.78
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
0.7 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.83
|
-0.2 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Error 0.83
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, and 52Population: FAS included all participants who were randomly assigned to a treatment group, received at least one dose of study agent and had a baseline HbA1c measurement. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 12 and 52 was reported. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for the combined population of arm Canagliflozin 100 mg and Canagliflozin 300 mg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 12 and 52
Week 12
|
0.10 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0138
|
-0.59 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.137
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 12 and 52
Week 52
|
0.70 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.182
|
-0.32 Percent (%) of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.184
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52Population: Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Growth velocity (increase in height per year) at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported. Growth velocity was derived from height measurements taken at baseline (Day 1), Week 26 and Week 52 visit. Growth velocity at Week 26 was derived as: (height at Week 26 - height at baseline)/(time from baseline to week 26. Similarly, growth velocity at Week 56 was derived.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=64 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=16 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Growth Velocity at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
2.08 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 3.148
|
1.94 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 2.791
|
1.00 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 4.294
|
|
Growth Velocity at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
1.63 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 2.624
|
1.46 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 1.824
|
1.76 Centimeter per year (cm/year)
Standard Deviation 3.004
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Tanner pubertal staging was assessed in female (F) for pubic hair growth and for breast development in stages (S) 1 to 5. If a participant had reached tanner S 5, no further Tanner pubertal S assessments were to be completed and reported as 'not done (ND)'. Tanner S Pubic hair growth: Pubic hair (1: No hair, 2: Downy hair, 3: More coarse and curly hair, 4: Adult-like hair quality; 5: Hair extends to medial surface of the thighs); Breast development: (1: The nipple is raised a little in this stage. The rest of the breast is still flat, 2: Breast bud forms,3: More elevated, outside areola, 4: Increased breast size, 5: Final adult-size breasts). Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported. Baseline=B, Week=W.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=56 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=47 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=7 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S 2 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
15 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S5 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S5 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
19 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S2 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
11 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S4 (at B) to ND (at W52)
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S5 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S5 (at B) to ND (at W52)
|
19 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Breast S: S3 (at B) to S2 (at W 52)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W26))
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
18 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S5 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S5 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
19 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S1 (at B) to S1 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
12 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Females) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to ND (at W52)
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26, and 52Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed): participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Tanner pubertal staging was assessed in male (M) for pubic hair growth and for genitalia development in S 1 to 5. If a participant had reached Tanner S5, no further Tanner pubertal S assessments were to be completed and reported as ND. Tanner S pubic hair growth: Pubic hair (1: No hair, 2: little soft, long, lightly curled hair at penis 3: More coarse and curly hair covered larger area, 4: Adult-like hair quality; 5: Hair extends to medial surface of the thighs); Genitalia development: (1: Testes, scrotum, and penis about same size, 2: Enlargement of scrotum, testes, and penis, 3: Enlargement of penis, 4: The penis and glans became larger, 5: Genitalia size and shape same an adult male). Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported. GD: genitalia development.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=9 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S5 (at B) to ND (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S1 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S1 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S1 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S4 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S5 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S5 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S1 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S2 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
GD: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S2 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S5 (at B) to S5 (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S5 (at B) to ND (at W26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S1 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S2 (at B) to S2 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S3 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S3 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S4 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S4 (at B) to S5 (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Tanner Staging (Males) From Baseline at Weeks 26 and 52
Pubic Hair: S5 (at B) to ND (at W52)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 26 and 52Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in bone turnover marker: serum osteocalcin and CTx at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=76 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=59 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=14 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Marker: Serum Osteocalcin and Serum Collagen Type 1 Carboxy-Telopeptide (CTx) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: Serum Osteocalcin
|
-3.594 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 17.0801
|
-3.328 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 15.1110
|
-0.904 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 10.3083
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Marker: Serum Osteocalcin and Serum Collagen Type 1 Carboxy-Telopeptide (CTx) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: Serum Osteocalcin
|
-8.732 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 19.3027
|
-5.964 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 16.8299
|
-3.475 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 9.2422
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Marker: Serum Osteocalcin and Serum Collagen Type 1 Carboxy-Telopeptide (CTx) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26: CTx
|
-0.1530 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.26595
|
0.3575 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation 0.34295
|
0.3000 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA implies standard deviation was not estimable because only one participant was available for the analysis.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Marker: Serum Osteocalcin and Serum Collagen Type 1 Carboxy-Telopeptide (CTx) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52: CTx
|
-0.0240 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA implies standard deviation was not estimable because only one participant was available for the analysis.
|
-0.3710 Micrograms/liter (mcg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA implies standard deviation was not estimable because only one participant was available for the analysis.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 26 and 52Population: Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Urinary ACR at Weeks 26 and 52 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 100/300 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized (1:1 ratio) at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg tablet and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=12 Participants
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (ACR) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 26
|
15.62 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 11.24 to 21.71
|
14.41 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 9.85 to 21.07
|
24.84 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 11.81 to 52.26
|
|
Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio (ACR) at Weeks 26 and 52
Week 52
|
14.98 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 10.97 to 20.46
|
15.45 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 10.75 to 22.22
|
21.27 Milligrams/gram (mg/g)
Interval 10.42 to 43.45
|
Adverse Events
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Placebo
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Canagliflozin 100 mg
n=67 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=87 participants at risk
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=17 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis Acute
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic Reaction
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle Fracture
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Control
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion Spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide Attempt
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar Hypertrophy
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Canagliflozin 100 mg
n=67 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Placebo
n=87 participants at risk
Participants received 1 placebo tablet matching to canagliflozin 100 milligrams (mg) orally once-daily from Day 1 till Week 52. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (glycated hemoglobin \[HbA1c\] of greater than or equal to (\>=)7.0 percent \[%\], estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \>=60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square \[mL/min/1.73 m\^2\]) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 300 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of placebo matching to canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
Canagliflozin 300 mg
n=17 participants at risk
Participants received canagliflozin 100 mg tablet orally once daily from Day 1 till Week 12. Participants who met re-randomization criteria (HbA1c of \>=7.0%, estimated eGFR \>=60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) at Week 12 were alone re-randomized at Week 13 in a 1:1 ratio to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 300 mg tablet orally and 1 tablet of placebo matching canagliflozin 100 mg once daily till Week 52. Participants who did not meet the re-randomization criteria continued to receive 1 tablet of canagliflozin 100 mg orally once daily till Week 52.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Lesion
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.7%
5/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
11.8%
2/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.0%
4/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
3.4%
3/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
General disorders
Thirst
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Vaginosis
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Balanitis Candida
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
External Ear Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genital Herpes
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genital Herpes Simplex
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genital Infection Fungal
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.9%
8/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.7%
5/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis Streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
12.6%
11/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
4.6%
4/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
29.4%
5/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection Bacterial
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Abrasion
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Laceration
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Glucose Increased
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Ketone Body Increased
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Investigations
High Density Lipoprotein Decreased
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus Inadequate Control
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.7%
5/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
9.2%
8/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D Deficiency
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
6.9%
6/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
1.1%
1/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.9%
8/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
3.4%
3/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ketonuria
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Balanoposthitis
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
0.00%
0/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
2.3%
2/87 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
5.9%
1/17 • Baseline (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose at Week 52 (up to Week 56)
Safety analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and took at least 1 dose of study agent.
|
Additional Information
Director Clinical Leader Internal Medicine
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days to allow for filing of a patent application.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER