Comparison of Two-hand Mask Ventilation Technique: Standard V-E Versus Reversal V-E Technique

NCT ID: NCT03170037

Last Updated: 2017-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2017-05-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study hypothesizes that a novel reversal V-E ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique and will be easier to use.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite advances in intubation technology, difficult airways persist. Because it is failure to oxygenate, not failure to intubate, that ultimately leads to brain injury and cardiovascular collapse, effective mask ventilation is at least as important as successful intubation. Therefore optimizing mask ventilation is crucial for clinicians. When difficult mask ventilation encounters, clinicians often switch to two hand technique to hold the mask including either "C-E" clamp or "V-E" clamp. Both volume mode ventilation and pressure mode ventilation are superior with the V-E technique as compared to the C-E technique. The study will test the hypothesis that a novel reversal V-E mask ventilation technique will retain its high efficiency as that of standard V-E technique but be easier to use than standard V-E technique.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Comparison of 2 two-handed mask ventilation techniques' ease to anesthesia providers
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard V-E ventilation technique

After induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the standard V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard V-E ventilation technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For the two-handed standard V-E technique, the facemask is first placed over the bridge of the nose and mouth and then held in place by performing at two-handed jaw thrust maneuver with the index and second finger of each hand and maintaining mask contact with the patient's face by using both thumbs with mouth open. A head-tilt is performed by applying a caudal force on the mandible and mask.

Reversal V-E ventilation technique

After induction of anesthesia subject will be ventilated using the reversal V-E ventilation technique. Ventilation will be carried out using pressure mode ventilation at respiratory rate of 10 breaths per minute, I:E ratio of 1:2, peak inspiratory pressure of 20cmH2O and no PEEP. If the subjects can be adequately ventilated, as defined by perceivable chest movement and end tidal CO2 during the first three breaths, ventilation will continue for total ten breaths.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reversal V-E ventilation technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

While using reversal V-E technique, the anesthesia provider stands 180 degrees opposite from the head of the bed. Thenar eminence and thumbs secure the mask around the nose while the remaining fingers pull the mandible anteriorly while keeping the mouth open.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard V-E ventilation technique

For the two-handed standard V-E technique, the facemask is first placed over the bridge of the nose and mouth and then held in place by performing at two-handed jaw thrust maneuver with the index and second finger of each hand and maintaining mask contact with the patient's face by using both thumbs with mouth open. A head-tilt is performed by applying a caudal force on the mandible and mask.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Reversal V-E ventilation technique

While using reversal V-E technique, the anesthesia provider stands 180 degrees opposite from the head of the bed. Thenar eminence and thumbs secure the mask around the nose while the remaining fingers pull the mandible anteriorly while keeping the mouth open.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Over 18 years of age
* Requiring general anesthesia
* BMI =\>30

Exclusion Criteria

* Untreated ischemic heart diseases
* Respiratory disorders, including COPD and asthma
* American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical class of 4 or greater
* Undergoing emergency surgery
* Requiring rapid sequence intubation for aspiration protection
* Non propofol - induction of anesthesia
* Requiring fiberoptic intubation
* Pregnant women or women who have given birth within the last month
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher Canlas

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christopher Canlas, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

170299

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.