Closed-loop Automatic Oxygen Control (CLAC-4) in Preterm Infants

NCT ID: NCT03163108

Last Updated: 2018-05-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-15

Study Completion Date

2018-01-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two-center, randomised controlled, cross-over clinical trial in preterm infants born at gestational age below 34+1/7 weeks receiving supplemental oxygen and respiratory support (Continous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) or Invasive Ventilation (IV)). Routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) will be tested against RMC supported by closed-loop automatic control (CLAC) with "slow"-algorithm and RMC supported by CLAC with "fast"-algorithm.

The primary hypothesis is, that the use of the "faster" algorithm results in more time within arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range compared to RMC only. The a-priori subordinate hypothesis is, that the faster algorithm is equally effective as the slower algorithm to maintain the SpO2 in the target range.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In preterm infants receiving supplemental oxygen, routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is often difficult and time consuming. The investigators developed a system for closed-loop automatic control (CLAC) of the FiO2 and demonstrated its safety and efficacy in a multi-center study. The objective of this study is to test a revised, "faster" algorithm with a shorter WAIT-interval of 30sec (= time between FiO2 changes) against the previously tested algorithm (WAIT of 180sec) and against RMC. The primary hypothesis is, that the application of CLAC with the "faster" algorithm in addition to RMC results in more time within arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) target range compared to RMC only. The a-priori subordinate hypothesis is, that the faster algorithm is equally effective as the slower algorithm to maintain the SpO2 in the target range.

Further hypotheses for exploratory testing are, that the "fast" algorithm will achieve a higher proportion of time with SpO2 within target range and an improved stability of cerebral oxygenation (measured as rcStO2 and rcFtO2E determined by Near-infrared spectroscopy) compared with the slow algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN The Study is designed as a two-center, randomized controlled, cross-over clinical trial in preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation or nasal continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation and supplemental oxygen (FiO2 above 0.21). Within a twenty-four-hour period the investigators will compare 8 hours of RMC with 8-hour periods of RMC supported by CLAC "slow" algorithm or "fast" algorithm, respectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilator Lung; Newborn

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RMC only

routine manual control (RMC) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

CLAC slow

routine manual control (RMC) + Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) with 180sec WAIT-Interval ("slow" algorithm) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) slow in addition to RMC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control is an automated, algorithm based adjustment of the fraction of inspired oxygen in relation to arterial saturation (WAIT-interval 180s).

CLAC fast

routine manual control (RMC) + Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) with 30sec WAIT-Interval ("fast" algorithm) of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) fast in addition to RMC

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control is an automated, algorithm based adjustment of the fraction of inspired oxygen in relation to arterial saturation (WAIT-interval 30s).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) fast in addition to RMC

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control is an automated, algorithm based adjustment of the fraction of inspired oxygen in relation to arterial saturation (WAIT-interval 30s).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control (CLAC) slow in addition to RMC

Closed-loop automatic oxygen control is an automated, algorithm based adjustment of the fraction of inspired oxygen in relation to arterial saturation (WAIT-interval 180s).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* gestational age at birth \<34+1/7weeks
* invasive mechanical ventilation OR noninvasive ventilation OR continous positive airway pressure support
* Fraction of inspired oxygen above 0.21 before inclusion
* more than 2 hypoxaemic events (arterial oxygen saturation below 80%) within 8 hours before inclusion
* parental written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* congenital pulmonary anomalies
* diaphragmatic hernia or other diaphragmatic disorders
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Heinen und Löwenstein GmbH & Co. KG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital Tuebingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Axel R Franz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Tuebingen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

University of Tubingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schwarz CE, Kidszun A, Bieder NS, Franz AR, Konig J, Mildenberger E, Poets CF, Seyfang A, Urschitz MS. Is faster better? A randomised crossover study comparing algorithms for closed-loop automatic oxygen control. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jul;105(4):369-374. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317029. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31527093 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLAC-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.