Biological-guided Metronomic Chemotherapy as Maintenance Strategy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03158610

Last Updated: 2021-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-29

Study Completion Date

2021-04-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Based upon biological behavior, those mCRC patients who respond well (SD, PR or CR according to RECIST Criteria) after 16-18 weeks of standard doublet chemotherapy as induction may enrolled into this study, randomly divided into capecitabine metronomic group or standard dosage group. The duration of disease control after randomization(PFS2) and progression free survival from enrollment (PFS1) are primary endpoints. Meanwhile, the overall survival, safety and quality of life are secondary endpoints. Exploratory markers involving angiogenesis (serum VEGF, PDGF, Tie-1 and Tie2, etc) and immune function (CD clusters, serum tumor mutation burden(TMB), etc), are conducted via liquid biopsy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is try to evaluate the effect of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy as maintenance treatment, which compare to capecitabine conventional chemotherapy, who have responded to 16-18 months first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The maintenance treatments are continued until disease progression or severe toxicity. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy is non-inferior to capecitabine conventional chemotherapy. Furthermore, exploratory markers involving angiogenesis (serum VEGF, PDGF, Tie-1 and Tie2, etc) and immune function (CD clusters, serum tumor mutation burden(TMB), etc), are conducted via liquid biopsy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy

Capecitabine 500mg/m2 bid po qd

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral fluorouracil

Capecitabine standard dosage chemotherapy

Capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid po d1-d14,q3w

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral fluorouracil

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Capecitabine

Oral fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xeloda

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological proof of colorectal cancer (in case of a single metastasis, histological or cytological proof of this lesion should be obtained);
* Distant metastases which are unresectable (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible);
* Measurable disease (\> 1 cm on spiral CT scan or \> 2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation;


* WHO performance status 0-1 (Karnofsky PS \> 70%);
* Disease evaluation with proven SD, PR or CR according to RECIST after first-line induction treatment;
* Laboratory values obtained ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomisation: adequate bone marrow function (Hb \> 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count \> 1.5 x 109/L, platelets \> 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, \> 30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases);
* Life expectancy \> 12 weeks;
* Age: 18-75 years;
* Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential;
* Expected adequacy of follow-up;
* Institutional Review Board approval;

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer ending within 6 months before the start of induction treatment
* Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases
* Previous systemic treatment for advanced disease

At randomisation:

* Chronic active infection;
* Any other concurrent severe or uncontrolled disease preventing the safe administration of study drugs;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jun Zhang

Deputy-chief of Department of Oncology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jun Zhang, MD & Ph. D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ruijin Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kareva I, Waxman DJ, Lakka Klement G. Metronomic chemotherapy: an attractive alternative to maximum tolerated dose therapy that can activate anti-tumor immunity and minimize therapeutic resistance. Cancer Lett. 2015 Mar 28;358(2):100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.039. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25541061 (View on PubMed)

Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A, Lledo G, Flesch M, Buyse M, Mineur L, Carola E, Etienne PL, Rivera F, Chirivella I, Perez-Staub N, Louvet C, Andre T, Tabah-Fisch I, de Gramont A. OPTIMOX1: a randomized study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-Go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer--a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):394-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.0106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16421419 (View on PubMed)

Andre T, Tournigand C, Mineur L, Fellague-Chebra R, Flesch M, Mabro M, Hebbar M, Postel Vinay S, Bidard FC, Louvet C, de Gramont A. Phase II study of an optimized 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin strategy (OPTIMOX2) with celecoxib in metastatic colorectal cancer: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol. 2007 Jan;18(1):77-81. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl336. Epub 2006 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17030548 (View on PubMed)

Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJ, Loosveld OJ, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FL, Erjavec Z, van der Torren AM, Tol J, Braun HJ, Nieboer P, van der Hoeven JJ, Haasjes JG, Jansen RL, Wals J, Cats A, Derleyn VA, Honkoop AH, Mol L, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25862517 (View on PubMed)

Shi M, Ma T, Xi W, Jiang J, Wu J, Zhou C, Yang C, Zhu Z, Zhang J. A study of capecitabine metronomic chemotherapy is non-inferior to conventional chemotherapy as maintenance strategy in responders after induction therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Trials. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4194-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32143730 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BIG-MOON

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of ES104 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT05167448 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2