Comparison of Survival Benefit of Panitumumab With Supportive Care to Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01412957
Last Updated: 2017-03-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
377 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Panitumumab Combination Study With Rilotumumab or Ganitumab in Wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
NCT00788957
Evaluating Panitumumab (ABX-EGF) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00113763
Panitumumab in Cetuximab Refractory KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer
NCT00842257
Conatumumab/Panitumumab Combination Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Study
NCT00630786
Study to Evaluate Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to Panitumumab
NCT00891930
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Panitumumab + BSC
Participants received panitumumab administered intravenously 6 mg/kg every 14 days plus BSC until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, death, or intolerance of study drug.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)
BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.
Panitumumab
Administered intravenously
BSC Alone
Participants received best supportive care until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)
BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)
BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.
Panitumumab
Administered intravenously
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Wild-type (without mutation in codons 12 and 13) KRAS gene in tumor tissue confirmed by a central laboratory
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
* At least 1 measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines.
* Treatment failure (defined as failure due to either disease progression \[clinical or radiological\] or toxicity \[treatment intolerance\]) of a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan may have been administered sequentially or in combination.
* Disease relapse within 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy (with either an irinotecan or oxaliplatin containing regimen) will also be considered as treatment failure of a prior regimen for metastatic disease
* Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of CRC
* Man or woman at least 18 years of age
* Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function
* Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours before randomization (for women of childbearing potential only)
* Subject or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent.
* Other protocol-specified criteria may apply
Exclusion Criteria
* History of another primary cancer within 5 years of randomization
* Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFR inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
* Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy) within 21 days before randomization
* Radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization.
* Other protocol-specified criteria may apply
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Amgen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Research Site
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Research Site
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Research Site
Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Research Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Research Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Temuco, Cautín, Chile
Research Site
Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile
Research Site
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Research Site
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Research Site
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Research Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Research Site
Changchun, Jilin, China
Research Site
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Research Site
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Research Site
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Research Site
Beijing, , China
Research Site
Chongqing, , China
Research Site
Chongqing, , China
Research Site
Shanghai, , China
Research Site
Osijek, , Croatia
Research Site
Pula, , Croatia
Research Site
Rijeka, , Croatia
Research Site
Split, , Croatia
Research Site
Zagreb, , Croatia
Research Site
Tallinn, , Estonia
Research Site
Tartu, , Estonia
Research Site
Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Chania, , Greece
Research Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
Research Site
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
Research Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Research Site
Kochi, Kerala, India
Research Site
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Research Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, India
Research Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, India
Research Site
Pune, Maharashtra, India
Research Site
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Research Site
Daugavpils, , Latvia
Research Site
Riga, , Latvia
Research Site
Riga, , Latvia
Research Site
Kaunas, , Lithuania
Research Site
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Research Site
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Research Site
Kampung Baharu Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Research Site
George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Research Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Research Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
Research Site
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
Research Site
Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, Mexico
Research Site
Davao City, Davao Region, Philippines
Research Site
Cebu City, , Philippines
Research Site
Manila, , Philippines
Research Site
Manila, , Philippines
Research Site
Pasay, , Philippines
Research Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Research Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Research Site
Craiova, , Romania
Research Site
Craiova, , Romania
Research Site
Lasi, , Romania
Research Site
Ploieşti, , Romania
Research Site
Suceava, , Romania
Research Site
Timișoara, , Romania
Research Site
Belgrade, , Serbia
Research Site
Kamenitz, , Serbia
Research Site
Niš, , Serbia
Research Site
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim TW, Elme A, Kusic Z, Park JO, Udrea AA, Kim SY, Ahn JB, Valencia RV, Krishnan S, Bilic A, Manojlovic N, Dong J, Guan X, Lofton-Day C, Jung AS, Vrdoljak E. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;115(10):1206-1214. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.309. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
AmgenTrials clinical trials website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-022951-49
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20100007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.