Comparison of Survival Benefit of Panitumumab With Supportive Care to Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01412957

Last Updated: 2017-03-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

377 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of panitumumab in addition to best supportive care compared to best supportive care alone in patients with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) metastatic colorectal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Panitumumab + BSC

Participants received panitumumab administered intravenously 6 mg/kg every 14 days plus BSC until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, death, or intolerance of study drug.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Intervention Type OTHER

BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.

Panitumumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered intravenously

BSC Alone

Participants received best supportive care until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death.

Group Type OTHER

Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Intervention Type OTHER

BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Best Supportive Care (BSC)

BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.

Intervention Type OTHER

Panitumumab

Administered intravenously

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vectibix

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)
* Wild-type (without mutation in codons 12 and 13) KRAS gene in tumor tissue confirmed by a central laboratory
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
* At least 1 measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines.
* Treatment failure (defined as failure due to either disease progression \[clinical or radiological\] or toxicity \[treatment intolerance\]) of a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan may have been administered sequentially or in combination.

* Disease relapse within 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy (with either an irinotecan or oxaliplatin containing regimen) will also be considered as treatment failure of a prior regimen for metastatic disease
* Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of CRC
* Man or woman at least 18 years of age
* Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function
* Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours before randomization (for women of childbearing potential only)
* Subject or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent.
* Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
* History of another primary cancer within 5 years of randomization
* Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFR inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
* Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy) within 21 days before randomization
* Radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization.
* Other protocol-specified criteria may apply
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Temuco, Cautín, Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Viña del Mar, Región de Valparaíso, Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Research Site

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Research Site

Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China

Site Status

Research Site

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Research Site

Changchun, Jilin, China

Site Status

Research Site

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Research Site

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Research Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Osijek, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Pula, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Rijeka, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Split, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Research Site

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Research Site

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Chania, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Research Site

Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Research Site

Kochi, Kerala, India

Site Status

Research Site

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

Research Site

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Research Site

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kampung Baharu Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Davao City, Davao Region, Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Cebu City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Pasay, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Lasi, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Kamenitz, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil Canada Chile China Croatia Estonia Greece India Latvia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Philippines Romania Serbia South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim TW, Elme A, Kusic Z, Park JO, Udrea AA, Kim SY, Ahn JB, Valencia RV, Krishnan S, Bilic A, Manojlovic N, Dong J, Guan X, Lofton-Day C, Jung AS, Vrdoljak E. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;115(10):1206-1214. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.309. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27736842 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-022951-49

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20100007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.