Capsaicin Patches In Knee Osteoarthritis In Obese Patients
NCT ID: NCT03153813
Last Updated: 2019-04-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Compare Levels of Capsaicin After Intra-Articular Injection and Topical Application in Patients With Painful Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03576508
Transdermal Ketoprofen to Treat Mild to Moderate Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain of the Knee
NCT00108810
HKT-500-US12 In Adult Patients With OA Knee Pain
NCT00647231
A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Intra-articular CNTX-4975-05 (Capsaicin) vs Placebo in Subjects With OA Knee Pain
NCT03429049
HKT-500 in Adult Patients With Osteoarthritis (OA) Knee Pain
NCT00792727
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One particularly exposed population to osteoarthritis is represented by obese patients. Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m², is considered to be one of the most important risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA) in knees. Numerous longitudinal studies show a strong association between obesity, and radiographic knee OA, e.g. in the Framingham Study, the Chingford Study, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the John Hopkins Precursors Study, and in longitudinal studies in UK and the Netherlands. Thus, the WHO initiative on counteracting obesity also accepts OA as a consequence of obesity . Each BMI increase by 1 kg/m² is associated with a 15% increased risk of OA. A number of recent studies involving the association between obesity and knee osteoarthritis have since been published. A large, population-based prospective study (n = 823) conducted by Toivanen et al. with a follow-up of 22 years found that the risk for knee osteoarthritis was 7 times greater for people with BMI ≥30 compared to the control of people with BMI \<25. A prospective cohort study of the Norwegian population by Grotle et al. (10) that followed 1,675 patients reported that BMI \>30 was significantly associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, with odds ratio of 2.81, and 95% CI of 1.32-5.96. Lohmander et al. found that in a large cohort study of 27,960 patients from the Swedish population, the relative risk for knee osteoarthritis (fourth quartile compared to first quartile) was 8.1, with a 95% CI of 5.3-12.4. Finally, a case-control study from Holliday et al. with 1,042 knee osteoarthritis patients and 1,121 matched controls reported that the adjusted odds ratio for knee osteoarthritis in patients with BMI \>30 was 7.48 with 95% CI of 5.45-10.27.
Pain is one of the major comorbid conditions that may preclude effective weight management in these patients, particularly with regards to physical activity, since pain increases with effort and movement. Obese patients generally receive oral analgesics, such as weak opioids or tramadol, but due to a number of associated comorbidities, they generally do not tolerate, or have contraindications to, centrally acting analgesics. Furthermore an increasing number of obese patients are managed by malabsorbtive bariatric surgical procedures, exposing them at risk for inefficacity by oral analgesics, in regards to the malabsorptive effect.
Therefore alternative therapies, and in particular topical treatments, may be indicated in these patients as these drugs have less systemic side effects. The use of such treatments in patients with obesity should contribute to facilitate rehabilitation and hence contribute to weight loss, which may further help to reduce pain.
One promising topical treatment is represented by capsaicin. Capsaicin is an agonist of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), a non-selective cation channel. It is well established that capsaicin applied in high concentration to the skin can cause initial nociceptor sensitization through its agonistic effects on TRPV1 receptors then subsequently acts in the skin to attenuate cutaneous hypersensitivity and reduce pain by a process best described as "defunctionalisation" of nociceptor fibres (e.g. temporary loss of membrane potential, inability to transport neurotrophic factors leading to altered phenotype, and reversible retraction of epidermal and dermal nerve fibre terminals). Evidence suggests that the utility of topical capsaicin may extend beyond painful peripheral neuropathies, and that this treatment may be particularly relevant in patients with osteoarthritis pain. Thus TRPV1 is mainly expressed by nociceptive neurons in dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia. However, there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 is also expressed in various cell types including synovial fibroblasts (SF) from patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) and thus may play a role in non-neuronal mechanisms that might modulate nociception in symptomatic osteoarthritis.
An additional effect of high concentration of capsaicin, which does not involve TRPV1, is a direct inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Furthermore, by using the approach of patch-clamp, capsaicinoids (capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin) have been shown to reversibly inhibit the currents of T-type voltage-dependent Ca2+channels, suggesting the effect of capsaicinoids on pain relief may also be related to the inhibition of T-type Ca2+ channels.
Capsaicin is metabolized rapidly by several cytochrome enzymes present in human liver, but in vitro studies shows that its metabolism in human skin is quite low. Capsaicin reside at the site of action (i.e. skin) relatively unchanged, whereas capsaicin which is transdermally absorbed is rapidly eliminated and does not have any systemic effect.
To date, repeated applications of low dose capsaicin cream at different concentrations (0.0125 to 0.25 %) have been found moderately effective in OA of the knee or hand, based on the basis of six double or single blind trials with sample sizes ranging from 14 to 200 patients. However repeated applications of capsaicin cream are difficult on the long term particularly because of the burning sensation induced by the cream and the necessity to repeat applications several times per day.
Recently high concentration capsaicin patches (8%) (Qutenza) have been developed for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. These treatments induce long lasting analgesic effects in these conditions lasting up to an average of 3 months after a 30 to 60 minutes application. The burning side effect related to the application of the patch is rapidly reversible and very few severe side effects have been reported with this procedure.
If the primary cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain lies deep within joints and topical capsaicin does not provide substantial transdermal delivery, then the apparent efficacy of topical capsaicin in lower back pain and OA could be postulated to be by CNS modulatory mechanisms. Another possibility is that alterations in, or sensitization of, cutaneous nociceptors could be a contributing factor. Such alterations might be driven by unusually high concentrations of cytokines or growth factors in joints which could either diffuse some distance away from the primary site of inflammation or promote excitatory phenotypes in nearby collateral axons. Furthermore there is increasing evidence that TRPV1 expression is not limited to primary afferent neurons but that the receptor is expressed in various cell types throughout the body. TRPV1 is present in synovial fibroblasts from symptomatic OA and RA (rheumatoid arthritis) patients and the receptor can be activated by stimulation with the vanilloid capsaicin. It is very likely that capsaicin stimulation does not only induce IL-6 production but also results in the release of other signalling molecules that may transfer the information to other non-neuronal or neuronal cells and thereby contribute to a modulation of nociception in the inflamed joint.
Based on the mechanisms described above, there are reasons to believe that Qutenza may also be effective in osteoarthritis pain. To date, there are strictly no data regarding potential efficacy and safety of this treatment in osteoarthritis pain in obese patients
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug
Up to 4 patches to cover a surface of 1200 cm2 will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)
capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)
Placebo
Up to 4 patches will be applied to the painful area depending on the surface of pain during 60 minutes : placebo
Placebo patches
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capsaicin 8% patches (Qutenza)
Placebo patches
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged over 18 years,
* have pain for at least 3 months due to mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee (meeting American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiographic criteria), of at least moderate intensity (pain intensity score over the last 24 hours before enrolment ≥ 4/10),
* with a BMI above 30 kg/m²
* and no other pain conditions accounting for their disability.
* The skin will be intact and no blessed.
* All female patients should take contraception during all study and at least 30 days after closer.
* All patients must sign informed consent.
* All patients will be recruited from the Department of Nutrition, Ambroise Paré University Hospital and treatment will be given during a dedicated day care clinic.
Exclusion Criteria
* with relative contraindications to capsaicin patches, particularly with unstable hypertension or cardiac condition,
* past history of capsaicin use will not be included.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nadine ATTAL
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nadine ATTAL
Co-investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claire Carette
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Ambroise Pare Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Ambroise Paré, Nutrition Department
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHILI-OB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.