Evaluation of Stability After Implantation of Two Different Lens Models: FEMTIS-study
NCT ID: NCT03152500
Last Updated: 2018-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-01
2017-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multicentric Clinical Study on Isatis TF Trifocal Intraocular Lens
NCT04465344
PMCF Study of Preloaded Trifocal IOL
NCT04884178
AMO's Tecnis™ Multifocal Intraocular Lenses (Tecnis MF), Alcon's ReStor Multifocal IOL
NCT01278420
Comparison Between a Toric Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lens
NCT04907318
Addressing of Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond-laser Assisted Versus Manual Lens Fragmentation Procedure
NCT01971177
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For the last decade conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS) is the dominant form of cataract surgery in developed countries, accounting for over 90 percent of these procedures.4 The basic phacoemulsification procedure has remained largely unchanged over the past 20 years, including a series of steps: creating corneal incision, capsulorhexis and lensfragmentation.4 Although highly successful, each of the steps mentioned above are created manually which affects the safety and effectiveness of the procedure.
Since the first human eye was treated by femtosecond laser cataract surgery in 2008, the femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) became an innovative growing new technology in the world of cataract surgery.4-7 Femtosecond-lasers are capable of performing some of the most delicate and essential key steps during cataract surgery: capsulotomy, lens fragmentation, and corneal incisions. 'Automating' these steps and performing them with increased precision could lead to an improved quality of capsulotomy, easier lens fragmentation, and more precisely positioned corneal incisions, which in turn, lead to improved visual and refractive outcomes, a decrease in intra- and postoperative complication rates, and increased quality of life.
In order to remove the crystallized human lens, a circular opening in the capsular lens bag, capsulotomy, needs to be created. After removing the lens an intraocular lens (IOL) can be inserted in the empty capsule bag. However, one of the factors affecting postoperative achieved visual acuity and refraction, is the behaviour of this IOL in the capsular bag. Preoperative measurements need to be obtained in order to calculate the required IOL. One of the challenges of these IOL calculations is determining exactly where in the eye the IOL will end up, the effective lens position (ELP). The position of the IOL is crucial for the IOL's general performance because it influences the postoperative IOL tilt, decentration, and posterior capsule opacification (PCO). Considering the anatomical variety between patients, the predictability of an individual's ELP remains an educated guess.
The ELP, and therefore the amount of IOL tilt, decentration and PCO, of an IOL is mainly influenced by the interaction between the IOL and the lens capsule, especially during the time of capsule shrinkage. Theoretically, the positive optical effect of an IOL is lost when there is more than 7 degrees of tilt or more than 0.4 mm of decentration.8 Furthermore, studies have shown the effect of axial displacement of an IOL on refractive error. There is approximately 1.25 D change per millimetre of the IOL's longitudinal displacement.9 This reflects the importance of a stable and predictable ELP.
As mentioned above, the anatomy of an individual's eye is unique and therefore, each ELP will be different when placing the IOL in the capsular bag. Therefore, a new lens type has been developed: the FEMTIS® FB-313 laser lens (FEMTIS-IOL, Oculentis). This IOL has a special haptic system and is designed to be clasped in the capsular bag opening and therefore, the ELP of this IOL is theoretically more stable and predictable, resulting in a higher predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. However, in order to provide as much stability as possible a (nearly) perfect capsulotomy is needed. Several comparative studies have shown that femtosecond-lasers produce a more precise, circular, reproducible, and better centered capsulotomy compared to conventional manual capsulorhexis.6-7 The combination between the femtosecond-assisted capsulotomy and the implantation of a FEMTIS-IOL in the capsular opening, could definitely contribute to the search of perfection in cataract surgery.
In this study the investigators will investigate the stability of lens position and the visual outcome after implantation of the new FEMTIS-IOL using FLACS capsulotomy compared to conventional placement of the IOL in the capsular bag. So far, there are no published studies using the FEMTIS-IOL. Therefore, the investigators will perform this randomized control trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FEMTIS IOL
The FEMTIS-IOL has a special haptic system that allows the lens to clamp into the capsulorrhexis.
FEMTIS 313G IOL
Haptic design that enclaves the capsulorrhexis
Acrysof IOL
The Acrysof IOL has a flexible haptic design that keeps the IOL stable and centered in the capsular bag
Acrysof SN60WF IOL
IOL in the bag
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FEMTIS 313G IOL
Haptic design that enclaves the capsulorrhexis
Acrysof SN60WF IOL
IOL in the bag
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cataracta Senilis
* Expected postoperative astigmatism ≤ 0.75 D (combination with FLACS AK is tolerated up to 1.25 D preoperative astigmatism)
* IOL power calculation between +10.00 D and 27.00 D
* Expected postoperative best-corrected visual acuity of logMAR +0.3 or better
* If eligible, availability to undergo second eye surgery within 2 weeks of the first eye surgery
* Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous corneal surgery and/or reshaping
* Clinically significant corneal endothelial dystrophy (e.g., Fuchs' dystrophy)
* Irregular astigmatism
* History of corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, etc.)
* Extensive age related macular degeneration (atrophic or exudative age-related macular degeneration or numerous soft drusen)
* Extensive visual field loss (e.g., glaucoma, history of cerebral vascular accidents, etc.)
* Extensive diabetic macular disease
* Amblyopia, strabismus
* Keratoconus
* Pseudoexfoliation syndrome or other capsule or zonular abnormalities that could affect postoperative centration or tilt of the IOL
* Pupil abnormalities (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils, or pupils that do not dilate at least 3.5 mm under mesopic/scotopic conditions)
* Cognitive, cerebral or concentration disorders (e.g. dementia, Parkinson, etc.)
* Suturing of incision required at time of surgery
* Complications during surgery of the first eye.
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oculentis
UNKNOWN
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rudy Nuijts, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL58195.068.16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.