Serum Assessment of Preterm Birth Outcomes Compared to Historical Controls: AVERT PRETERM TRIAL

NCT ID: NCT03151330

Last Updated: 2024-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1873 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Preterm birth (PTB) remains the leading cause of neonatal mortality and long term disability throughout the world. Recently treatments early in pregnancy such as progesterone, cervical support and maternal support have been demonstrated to delay delivery amongst at risk women. Nonetheless, the majority of women who are at risk are not identified using current screening modalities.

Hypothesis: A cohort of pregnancies who are screened using the PreTRM® test around 20 weeks gestation in which a bundle of interventions is given for elevated PreTRM® risk will show either decreased neonatal morbidity/and mortality (measured as a composite score, "NMI"), or decreased length of neonatal stay in the hospital (NNOLOS). Secondarily, they will show an increase in gestational age at birth (GAB) and a reduction in length of neonatal NICU stay (NICULOS), compared to an unscreened historical control group.

Study Design Type: Prospective cohort study of screened women compared to a historical control of 10000 women.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Population: Women who are 18 years or older, with a singleton pregnancy between 195/7 weeks and 206/7 weeks gestational age (GA) confirmed by ultrasound prior to enrollment, and no history of prior preterm birth (delivery between 160/7 weeks and 366/7 weeks) will be invited to participate. A comparable population will be identified using a historical control group in a contemporaneously maintained database.

Intervention: Qualifying women will be screened using the PreTRM® test (Sera Prognostics, Inc.) at a large tertiary care center. Predicated upon the degree of risk, women will be treated according to a prespecified algorithm. The outcomes of these women will be compared to a historical control group at the same tertiary care center.

Outcomes:

Primary outcome: Co-Primary outcomes: To determine whether a cohort of women who are screened with the PreTRM® test and then managed according to a prespecified protocol will have statistically significant reductions in either (a) composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (NMI score), or (b) length of neonatal hospital stay (NNOLOS), compared to a historical control group. The NMI is defined below

DEFINITIONS OF COMPOSITE PERINATAL MORTALITY/NEONATAL MORBIDITY OUTCOME SCORES:

1\) 0 to 4 scale without NICU: This score was derived as an ordinal scale based upon severity. The score was defined by the following: 0 = no events;

1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, proven sepsis, or NEC) and no perinatal mortality,
2. = two events and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three or more events and no perinatal mortality; 4=perinatal mortality.

2\) 0 to 4 scale with NICU: This score was defined as the following: 0 = no events,

1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, proven sepsis, or NEC) or \<5 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
2. = two events or between 5 and 20 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three or more events or \>20 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
4. = perinatal mortality.

3\) 0 to 6 scale without NICU: This score was defined as the following: 0 = no events;

1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, proven sepsis, or NEC) and no perinatal mortality,
2. = two events and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three events and no perinatal mortality;
4. = four events and no perinatal mortality;
5. = five events and no perinatal mortality;
6. = perinatal mortality.

4\) Any morbidity or mortality event: (yes/no)

* Adapted from Hassan SS, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38:18-31 Supplementary Information

Secondary outcomes: To determine whether women who are screened with the PreTRM® test and then managed according to a pre-specified treatment algorithm will have a statistically significant reduction in proportion of any type of preterm births (spontaneous and indicated), the total length of hospital stay for spontaneous preterm births, and total length of hospital stay for any preterm birth.

Observations:

* Neonatal death and stillbirth
* Birth weight and number of subjects with birth weight \<1500g and \<2500g
* Total number of days spent in the NICU and nursery
* Composite neonatal morbidity score and components
* Whether or not received surfactant
* Occurrence of pneumonia
* Number of days of mechanical ventilation
* Number of subjects with 5 minute Apgar \< 7
* Occurrence of asphyxia
* Number of preterm deliveries at \<37, \<35 and \<32 weeks
* Occurrence of preeclampsia
* Proportion of primiparous women experiencing preterm birth and spontaneous preterm birth
* NICU days for spontaneous preterm birth in primiparous women in prospective treatment arm are significantly less than NICU days in primiparous women in the control group of sPTB
* Correlation of blood levels of 17-OHPC and other progestin levels to outcomes and observations

General Outcomes:

Total cost of hospital care for both the mother and fetus beginning at initiation of care through primary delivery and 28 days of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Birth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Women who are found to have an elevated risk of preterm birth will receive counseling regarding potential interventions and compared to historical controls
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Screened arm

This will be an arm of women who are prospectively screened and receive a risk score for preterm birth. They will be recommended treatment strategies and their outcomes compared to an historical control.

Group Type OTHER

Screened Arm

Intervention Type OTHER

Woman who are identified as high risk will be advised of potential interventions which will include support through care link(nurse education), cervical surveillance, consider vaginal progesterone, low dose aspirin if not already taking.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Screened Arm

Woman who are identified as high risk will be advised of potential interventions which will include support through care link(nurse education), cervical surveillance, consider vaginal progesterone, low dose aspirin if not already taking.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women 18 years of age or older
* Singleton intrauterine pregnancy
* No medical contraindications to continuing pregnancy
* Subject has no signs and/or symptoms of preterm labor and has intact membranes
* Planned delivery at Christiana Care Health System,
* English speaking as consents from other languages will not be provided.

Exclusion Criteria

* Women who have taken or plan to take progesterone beyond 14weeks gestation prior to study enrollment
* Previous history of sPTB less than37 weeks gestation or PPROM less than34 weeks gestation
* Multiple gestations-including a pregnancy that is now a single fetus due to a reduction procedure, vanishing twin, etc
* Known fetal genetic anomalies that are incompatible with life. Examples would include trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Others would be left to the discretion of the site investigators
* Any other medical conditions that may be considered a contraindication per the judgment of the site investigator
* The subject has a planned cesarean section or induction of labor prior to 370/7 weeks of gestation
* The subject has a planned cerclage placement for the current pregnancy
* Major structural anomalies that may shorten pregnancy- examples would include anencephaly, holoprosencephaly, schizencephaly, gastroschisis, omphalocele, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, pyloric stenosis, etc. Minor anomalies such as polydactyly, unilateral hydronephrosis are not viewed as exclusions. Others would be left to the discretion of the site investigators
* History of cervical conization
* The subject has a uterine anomaly, History of classical cesarean section in a previous pregnancy
* The subject has had a blood transfusion during the current pregnancy
* The subject has known elevated bilirubin levels (hyperbilirubinemia)
* Previously identified short cervix (\< 2.5 cm by TVUS)
* The subject has taken or plans to take any of the following medications after the first day of the last menstrual period: Enoxaparin, heparin, heparin sodium, low molecular weight heparin or the subject has a history of allergic reaction to aspirin or progesterone.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Christiana Care Health Services

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthew Hoffman

Chair Department of OB/GYN

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew K Hoffman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ChristianaCare

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Christiana Hospital

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003 Nov 7;52(9):1-85.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14626726 (View on PubMed)

Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):663-671. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ca847.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21446209 (View on PubMed)

CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1994 Mar 12;343(8898):619-29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7906809 (View on PubMed)

Esplin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, Parker CB, Wapner RJ, Grobman WA, Simhan HN, Wing DA, Haas DM, Silver RM, Hoffman MK, Peaceman AM, Caritis SN, Parry S, Wadhwa P, Foroud T, Mercer BM, Hunter SM, Saade GR, Reddy UM; nuMoM2b Network. Predictive Accuracy of Serial Transvaginal Cervical Lengths and Quantitative Vaginal Fetal Fibronectin Levels for Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women. JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1047-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1373.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28291893 (View on PubMed)

Rittenberg C, Newman RB, Istwan NB, Rhea DJ, Stanziano GJ. Preterm birth prevention by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate vs. daily nursing surveillance. J Reprod Med. 2009 Feb;54(2):47-52.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19301566 (View on PubMed)

Saade GR, Boggess KA, Sullivan SA, Markenson GR, Iams JD, Coonrod DV, Pereira LM, Esplin MS, Cousins LM, Lam GK, Hoffman MK, Severinsen RD, Pugmire T, Flick JS, Fox AC, Lueth AJ, Rust SR, Mazzola E, Hsu C, Dufford MT, Bradford CL, Ichetovkin IE, Fleischer TC, Polpitiya AD, Critchfield GC, Kearney PE, Boniface JJ, Hickok DE. Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):633.e1-633.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26874297 (View on PubMed)

Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, El-Refaie W, Rode L, Brizot ML, Cetingoz E, Serra V, Da Fonseca E, Abdelhafez MS, Tabor A, Perales A, Hassan SS, Nicolaides KH. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):303-314. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28067007 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DDD603819

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of the PDA Trial
NCT03456336 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE3