Serum Assessment of Preterm Birth Outcomes Compared to Historical Controls: AVERT PRETERM TRIAL
NCT ID: NCT03151330
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1873 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-15
2024-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: A cohort of pregnancies who are screened using the PreTRM® test around 20 weeks gestation in which a bundle of interventions is given for elevated PreTRM® risk will show either decreased neonatal morbidity/and mortality (measured as a composite score, "NMI"), or decreased length of neonatal stay in the hospital (NNOLOS). Secondarily, they will show an increase in gestational age at birth (GAB) and a reduction in length of neonatal NICU stay (NICULOS), compared to an unscreened historical control group.
Study Design Type: Prospective cohort study of screened women compared to a historical control of 10000 women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prematurity Risk Assessment Combined With Clinical Interventions for Improving Neonatal outcoMEs
NCT04301518
Premature Rupture Membranes and tPTL: a Personalised Approach (PROMPT)
NCT04878978
Philadelphia Preterm Prevention Project
NCT01117922
Generic Database of Moderate Preterm Infants
NCT01793116
Decision Aid - Extreme Prematurity
NCT01713894
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention: Qualifying women will be screened using the PreTRM® test (Sera Prognostics, Inc.) at a large tertiary care center. Predicated upon the degree of risk, women will be treated according to a prespecified algorithm. The outcomes of these women will be compared to a historical control group at the same tertiary care center.
Outcomes:
Primary outcome: Co-Primary outcomes: To determine whether a cohort of women who are screened with the PreTRM® test and then managed according to a prespecified protocol will have statistically significant reductions in either (a) composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (NMI score), or (b) length of neonatal hospital stay (NNOLOS), compared to a historical control group. The NMI is defined below
DEFINITIONS OF COMPOSITE PERINATAL MORTALITY/NEONATAL MORBIDITY OUTCOME SCORES:
1\) 0 to 4 scale without NICU: This score was derived as an ordinal scale based upon severity. The score was defined by the following: 0 = no events;
1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, proven sepsis, or NEC) and no perinatal mortality,
2. = two events and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three or more events and no perinatal mortality; 4=perinatal mortality.
2\) 0 to 4 scale with NICU: This score was defined as the following: 0 = no events,
1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, proven sepsis, or NEC) or \<5 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
2. = two events or between 5 and 20 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three or more events or \>20 days in the NICU, and no perinatal mortality;
4. = perinatal mortality.
3\) 0 to 6 scale without NICU: This score was defined as the following: 0 = no events;
1. = one event for (RDS, BPD, grade III or IV IVH, proven sepsis, or NEC) and no perinatal mortality,
2. = two events and no perinatal mortality;
3. = three events and no perinatal mortality;
4. = four events and no perinatal mortality;
5. = five events and no perinatal mortality;
6. = perinatal mortality.
4\) Any morbidity or mortality event: (yes/no)
* Adapted from Hassan SS, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38:18-31 Supplementary Information
Secondary outcomes: To determine whether women who are screened with the PreTRM® test and then managed according to a pre-specified treatment algorithm will have a statistically significant reduction in proportion of any type of preterm births (spontaneous and indicated), the total length of hospital stay for spontaneous preterm births, and total length of hospital stay for any preterm birth.
Observations:
* Neonatal death and stillbirth
* Birth weight and number of subjects with birth weight \<1500g and \<2500g
* Total number of days spent in the NICU and nursery
* Composite neonatal morbidity score and components
* Whether or not received surfactant
* Occurrence of pneumonia
* Number of days of mechanical ventilation
* Number of subjects with 5 minute Apgar \< 7
* Occurrence of asphyxia
* Number of preterm deliveries at \<37, \<35 and \<32 weeks
* Occurrence of preeclampsia
* Proportion of primiparous women experiencing preterm birth and spontaneous preterm birth
* NICU days for spontaneous preterm birth in primiparous women in prospective treatment arm are significantly less than NICU days in primiparous women in the control group of sPTB
* Correlation of blood levels of 17-OHPC and other progestin levels to outcomes and observations
General Outcomes:
Total cost of hospital care for both the mother and fetus beginning at initiation of care through primary delivery and 28 days of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Screened arm
This will be an arm of women who are prospectively screened and receive a risk score for preterm birth. They will be recommended treatment strategies and their outcomes compared to an historical control.
Screened Arm
Woman who are identified as high risk will be advised of potential interventions which will include support through care link(nurse education), cervical surveillance, consider vaginal progesterone, low dose aspirin if not already taking.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Screened Arm
Woman who are identified as high risk will be advised of potential interventions which will include support through care link(nurse education), cervical surveillance, consider vaginal progesterone, low dose aspirin if not already taking.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Singleton intrauterine pregnancy
* No medical contraindications to continuing pregnancy
* Subject has no signs and/or symptoms of preterm labor and has intact membranes
* Planned delivery at Christiana Care Health System,
* English speaking as consents from other languages will not be provided.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous history of sPTB less than37 weeks gestation or PPROM less than34 weeks gestation
* Multiple gestations-including a pregnancy that is now a single fetus due to a reduction procedure, vanishing twin, etc
* Known fetal genetic anomalies that are incompatible with life. Examples would include trisomy 13 and trisomy 18. Others would be left to the discretion of the site investigators
* Any other medical conditions that may be considered a contraindication per the judgment of the site investigator
* The subject has a planned cesarean section or induction of labor prior to 370/7 weeks of gestation
* The subject has a planned cerclage placement for the current pregnancy
* Major structural anomalies that may shorten pregnancy- examples would include anencephaly, holoprosencephaly, schizencephaly, gastroschisis, omphalocele, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, pyloric stenosis, etc. Minor anomalies such as polydactyly, unilateral hydronephrosis are not viewed as exclusions. Others would be left to the discretion of the site investigators
* History of cervical conization
* The subject has a uterine anomaly, History of classical cesarean section in a previous pregnancy
* The subject has had a blood transfusion during the current pregnancy
* The subject has known elevated bilirubin levels (hyperbilirubinemia)
* Previously identified short cervix (\< 2.5 cm by TVUS)
* The subject has taken or plans to take any of the following medications after the first day of the last menstrual period: Enoxaparin, heparin, heparin sodium, low molecular weight heparin or the subject has a history of allergic reaction to aspirin or progesterone.
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Christiana Care Health Services
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Matthew Hoffman
Chair Department of OB/GYN
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew K Hoffman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ChristianaCare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Christiana Hospital
Newark, Delaware, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003 Nov 7;52(9):1-85.
Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):663-671. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ca847.
CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women. CLASP (Collaborative Low-dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1994 Mar 12;343(8898):619-29.
Esplin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, Parker CB, Wapner RJ, Grobman WA, Simhan HN, Wing DA, Haas DM, Silver RM, Hoffman MK, Peaceman AM, Caritis SN, Parry S, Wadhwa P, Foroud T, Mercer BM, Hunter SM, Saade GR, Reddy UM; nuMoM2b Network. Predictive Accuracy of Serial Transvaginal Cervical Lengths and Quantitative Vaginal Fetal Fibronectin Levels for Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women. JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1047-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1373.
Rittenberg C, Newman RB, Istwan NB, Rhea DJ, Stanziano GJ. Preterm birth prevention by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate vs. daily nursing surveillance. J Reprod Med. 2009 Feb;54(2):47-52.
Saade GR, Boggess KA, Sullivan SA, Markenson GR, Iams JD, Coonrod DV, Pereira LM, Esplin MS, Cousins LM, Lam GK, Hoffman MK, Severinsen RD, Pugmire T, Flick JS, Fox AC, Lueth AJ, Rust SR, Mazzola E, Hsu C, Dufford MT, Bradford CL, Ichetovkin IE, Fleischer TC, Polpitiya AD, Critchfield GC, Kearney PE, Boniface JJ, Hickok DE. Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):633.e1-633.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, El-Refaie W, Rode L, Brizot ML, Cetingoz E, Serra V, Da Fonseca E, Abdelhafez MS, Tabor A, Perales A, Hassan SS, Nicolaides KH. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):303-314. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DDD603819
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.