Ultrasound Evaluation of the IVC in Addition to Clinical Assessment to Guide Decongestion in ADHF

NCT ID: NCT03140566

Last Updated: 2019-09-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

388 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-03

Study Completion Date

2019-09-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

CAVA-ADHF is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, patient-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial. The objective is to test whether evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter in addition to clinical assessment is superior compared to clinical assessment alone with respect to the surrogate endpoint of change in NT-proBNP from baseline to discharge. The CAVA-ADHF trial is supported by the Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Only limited evidence is available on the best method to monitor and guide decongestion in acute decompensated heart failure. Therefore, no specific guideline recommendations are made in this regard. It is unknown whether an objective congestion marker can be used to guide decongestion or such marker is only of prognostic value by identifying high-risk patients with an advanced disease state.

CAVA-ADHF is designed as prospective, randomized, controlled, patient-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial and aims to demonstrate effectiveness of inferior vena cava (IVC)-guided decongestion, its feasibility, and to estimate effect size and variability of clinical endpoints following the intention-to-treat principle.

After inclusion and exclusion criteria have been checked patients will be randomized:

Experimental intervention: Decongesting treatment guided by clinical assessment and ultrasound evaluation of the IVC diameter. Decongestion should lead to a maximal IVC diameter ≤2.1 cm and IVC collapsibility index \>50% in addition to relief of symptoms and signs of congestion before discharge.

Control intervention: Decongesting treatment guided by clinical assessment alone. The IVC ultrasound evaluation is performed, but results are not reported to treating physicians.

Trial intervention will end with discharge from the index hospitalization. Patients will be followed-up for 180 to 210 days after randomization.

The CAVA-ADHF trial is supported by the Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical assessment plus IVC diameter

Decongesting treatment guided by clinical assessment and ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Treatment will be guided by clinical assessment and ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. Decongestion should lead to maximal IVC diameter ≤2.1 cm and IVC collapsibility index \>50% in addition to relief of symptoms and signs of congestion before discharge.

Clinical assessment only

Decongesting treatment guided by clinical assessment alone

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Teatment guided by clinical assessment alone. Decongestion should lead to relief of symptoms and signs of congestion before discharge. IVC ultrasound evaluation is performed, but results are not reported to treating physicians.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter

Treatment will be guided by clinical assessment and ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. Decongestion should lead to maximal IVC diameter ≤2.1 cm and IVC collapsibility index \>50% in addition to relief of symptoms and signs of congestion before discharge.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Sham ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava diameter

Teatment guided by clinical assessment alone. Decongestion should lead to relief of symptoms and signs of congestion before discharge. IVC ultrasound evaluation is performed, but results are not reported to treating physicians.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hospitalization for ADHF with dyspnea ≥NYHA III, peripheral edema, and pulmonary congestion (rales on auscultation or pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiograph)
* Age ≥18 years
* NT-proBNP \>300 ng/l within 24 h after admission
* Sufficient ultrasound visualization to evaluate IVC
* IVCmax \>2.1 cm and IVCCI ≤50 % in the baseline assessment within 24 h after admission
* Capability to sign informed consent personally

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiogenic shock with systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg plus end-organ hypoperfusion
* ADHF due to significant arrhythmias
* Severe pulmonary disease as primary cause of dyspnea
* Simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min/1.73 m²
* Need for non-invasive or invasive ventilation support at baseline
* Pregnancy
* Participation in another interventional trial regarding heart failure treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Luebeck

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Holger Thiele

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitäres Herzzentrum Lübeck

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jobs A, Rausch TK, Konig IR, Vonthein R, Devendra A, Schafer J, Nauck M, Eitel I, Stiermaier T, Laugwitz KL, Ledwoch J, Valentova M, von Haehling S, Stork S, Arnold N, Karakas M, Westermann D, Lenz T, Gori T, Edelmann F, Seppelt P, Felix SB, Lutz M, Hedwig F, Akin I, Scherer C, Desch S, Thiele H; CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10 Investigators. Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound to Guide Decongestion in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2025 Sep 9;13(10):102578. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102578. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40929999 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAVA-ADHF-DZHK10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.