Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-03-13
2025-04-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analysis of Bone Micro-Architecture as a Clinical Biomarker for Image-Based Fracture Risk Estimation.
NCT03463850
Bone Mineral Density in Adult Survivors of Solid Pediatric Cancers
NCT00634816
Bone Mineral Density Status in Pediatric and Adolescent Survivors of Childhood Cancer With History of Bone Fracture
NCT02355340
Pelvic Fractures and Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer
NCT00800644
Longitudinal Study of Bone Mineral Density in Survivors of Solid Pediatric Cancers
NCT00615485
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bone density has been investigated as a possible fracture prediction tool. Work by Dhakal et al. suggested specifically that bone density, as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), of the irradiated limb is not decreased following therapeutic doses of radiotherapy (50 Gy) administered for soft tissue sarcomas. However, their technique did not measure pre-radiotherapy bone mineral density (BMD), but rather compared post-radiotherapy BMD of the irradiated site to contralateral and ipsilateral non-irradiated long bones of the extremity. While this technique accounted for disuse osteopenia (bone loss due to decreased use of the afflicted limb), it did not account for any systemic effects of radiation therapy. This is important, because largely based on their work, BMD has not been utilized as a predictor of risk of fracture, and other measures have been sought for this particular clinical situation without success. Others have also failed to show decreased BMD within the irradiated field. However, these studies have either lacked power to show statistical significance or the patient population was pediatric, a growing population in which age related accrual of bone density was a potential confounder.
What Dhakal and others did not account for was the possibility of abscopal (systemic) effects of radiotherapy that might also affect the contralateral and distant sites. Recent work in this investigators laboratory and others using small animal models has suggested that radiation to one limb has statistically significant effects on the contralateral limb in terms of decreased bone mineral density and loss of bone strength. The importance and clinical implications of such an abscopal effect is as of yet unclear. At the very least, its presence calls into question the conclusion that bone density is not decreased at the site of radiation, since differences may only be able to be shown when compared to non-irradiated control subjects. Moreover, there may be an adverse effect on distant bones, further lowering BMD and contributing to fragility fractures, particularly in post-menopausal women who are already at some increased risk. There is mixed clinical data on this topic, with one series of 45,662 prostate cancer patients showing a 76% increased risk of hip fracture (regional bone) following pelvic radiation, but no increased risk of fractures outside the field of radiation in three studies of patients with pelvic radiation for cervical and other female cancers or prostate cancer.
The investigators of this study propose to determine whether human subjects undergoing radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas exhibit for abscopal bone loss. Patients in the PI's (Dr. Damron) practice obtain baseline-staging studies, including computerized tomography (CT) of the chest/abdomen/pelvis prior to treatment. Post-treatment, patients then undergo oncology surveillance utilizing routine repetitive computerized tomography of the chest and sometimes of the abdomen/pelvis for a subset where the baseline abdomen/pelvis CT scans show abnormalities that need to be followed. These CT scans, when combined with calibration phantoms of known density, afford a prime opportunity to quantify bone mineral density based on those scans at sites distant to the primary site of radiotherapy (typically in the extremity).
This project will also evaluate a secondary aim, that of comparing effectiveness of utilization of CT vs BMD as a tool to evaluate bone loss in short term with a potential for long term fracture prediction in this patient population. In order to accomplish this aim, simultaneously, in a subset of patients who give consent for non-standard of care DXA scans, the investigators will evaluate the potential abscopal bone loss by assessing changes in BMD as measured by DXA, a tool that is a gold standard for bone density evaluation and for fracture prediction in routine clinical practice. The investigators will compare BMD pre- and post-radiotherapy at the site of irradiation, and further compare this change to that of the change in BMD at distant sites.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
Subjects will not have any additional scans only those that are standard of care. Their data will be used for comparison
Control Group
No interventions this is the control group-no additional scans
CT Scan only
Three CT Scans will be done of the affected extremity as well as the contralateral extremity at Baseline (pre-radiotherapy), and 6 months and 1 year post-radiotherapy treatment.
CT Scan
CT Scan of affected and contralateral limb
DEXA Scans only
Three DEXA Scans will be done of the affected extremity as well as the contralateral extremity at Baseline (pre-radiotherapy), and 6 months and 1 year post-radiotherapy treatment
DEXA Scans
DEXA Scan of affected and contralateral limb
CT and DEXA Scans
Three CT Scans and three DEXA Scans will be done of the affected extremity as well as the contralateral extremity at Baseline (pre-radiotherapy), and 6 months and 1 year post-radiotherapy treatment
CT and DEXA Scans
CT Scan and DEXA Scan of affected and contralateral limb
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Control Group
No interventions this is the control group-no additional scans
CT Scan
CT Scan of affected and contralateral limb
DEXA Scans
DEXA Scan of affected and contralateral limb
CT and DEXA Scans
CT Scan and DEXA Scan of affected and contralateral limb
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be at least 18 years of age and no older than 89 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have soft tissue sarcoma who will not receive adjuvant radiotherapy, such as those with atypical lipomatous tumors or other low grade soft tissue sarcomas
* Patients who will not be obtaining their follow up CT studies at Upstate Bone and Joint Center-since the calibration phantom needs to be located in one central location.
* Incarcerated patients
* Patients younger than 18 years of age
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timothy Damron, M.D.
David G. Murray Professor of Orthopedic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Timothy Damron, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1019460
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.