Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-28
2018-03-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As there is usually no cure for chronic pain, healthcare professionals are increasingly turning to methods of treatment that emphasise management of symptoms rather than elimination of pain. However, as Pain Concern's previous research has shown, there are several barriers to self-management that both healthcare professionals and people with pain face in their consultations in primary care. The Navigator Tool Intervention has been designed to overcome the majority of these barriers through improving the quality of communication regarding self-management during consultations.
In line with the House of Care Model, where care relies on engaged and informed patients, healthcare professionals committed to partnership working, and organisational processes that support this, our intervention prepares both the healthcare professionals and patients for their consultation. By providing a training session for the healthcare professionals in how supported self-management can be brought into the consultation room, and by providing the patients with a paper-based tool that allows them to organise their concerns and questions prior to the consultation, the intervention aims to steer the conversation toward the aspects that the patient needs to discuss in order to better manage their pain.
This study will launch the intervention and evaluate its effectiveness in improving self-management support through conversation. It will be launched over a 3 month period in 4 sites across Scotland; 24 patients will be using the tool with a trained healthcare professional and 24 will act as a control group, receiving standard care without the tool.
Questionnaires assessing the satisfaction with the consultation(s) and communication, as well as confidence in managing one's pain, will be analysed and compared between the two groups. Interviews will be carried out with healthcare professionals and a sample of patients having used the tool to gain a deeper understanding of the usefulness of the intervention and how it may be improved in the future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
NCT05492903
Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain With Non-Pharmacological Therapies
NCT06440668
iACT With Pain: an ICT-delivered Intervention for Self-management of Chronic Pain
NCT04200183
Pain Program for Active Coping & Training
NCT02113592
Chronic Pain Self-management for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Pilot Trial
NCT06182423
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
4 sites within primary care will be recruited through Pain Concern's current network of healthcare professionals. The sites will consists of general practitioners, physiotherapists and pharmacists, to ensure that the study reflects the usefulness of the intervention across primary care. Each site will nominate 1-2 healthcare professionals who will undergo a training session to learn about supported self-management and how to use the paper-based Navigator Tool effectively. This training will be developed as a collaboration between Pain Concern and the Thistle Foundation, an organisation specializing in supporting self-management for people living with chronic conditions.
Each site will identify 12 patients from their practice who will be asked to participate in the study. With their consent, the patient's contact details will be passed to the researcher who will contact them over the phone and inform them of what the study entails. Prior to this phone call, the patients will have received a written information and a consent sheet through email, post or in person at their practice. The signed consent sheet can be returned the in same way. Once recruited, the participants will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (24 patients) or the control group (24 patients).
Once allocated to a group, the participant will be sent a pre-intervention pack. There will be two versions of this pack, one for the intervention group and one for the control group. Both packs will contain a Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the pack for the intervention group will contain a copy of the Navigator Tool. The participants will be instructed to fill out the questionnaire straight away and return it to the researcher through email or post.
During the active research period (3months), the intervention group will have 2-3 consultations using the tool with a healthcare professional who has undergone the training session. The control group will receive "standard care", i.e. they will not have access to the paper-based tool, and they will be allocated whatever healthcare professional they would have seen if they had not been in the study. There will be no regulation of how many consultations these control participants will have during the research period.
After the 3 month active research period, all patient participants be sent a post-intervention pack. The intervention and control group will be sent identical packs, consisting of a demographics questionnaire, another PSEQ, and a Consultation Quality Index -2 (CQI-2) (which includes the CARE measure).
The scores will be compared between the control and active group and indicate the effect intervention has on our outcome measures. The two most important outcome measures are improvement in communication (measured by CQI-2) and improvement in confidence of pain management (PSEQ). Other outcome measures include engagement with the intervention, perceived participation in decision making, consultations and relational satisfaction and patient-centeredness, extent to which GP was enabling to the patients and perceived efficacy for self-management, scores of which will also be derived from the above questionnaires.
A more in-depth follow-up interview will be conducted with all HCPs and a sample of patient participants (8 patients) spread out over the 4 sites. These interviews will provide a more specific, nuanced and individual understanding of the patients' and healthcare professionals' satisfaction with the intervention and quality of consultations. Possible topics include ease of use, impact on consultation length, effectiveness of communication, required changes to the intervention, and extent to which the intervention achieved aims. These interviews will take place 1-2 months after the last consultation with the tool has taken place, last for around 30-45 minutes, and will be conducted in a venue close to the primary care site the participant was recruited from.
The interviews will be recorded and the researcher will then transcribe the interviews and code them using N-vivo. Themes will be elicited and cross-compared between the participants to establish prevalent experiences, views and attitudes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group (using Navigator Tool)
The participants will receive a copy of the Navigator Tool Intervention, a paper-based information pack including the My Pain Concerns Form, suggested questions to ask your healthcare professional, a goal setting sheet and information on common self-management strategies. They will be encouraged to fill in some of the forms before the consultation, and some during the consultation. They will have consultations with a healthcare professional who has undergone a Self-management Awareness Training with the Thistle Foundation.
The Navigator Tool Intervention
The intervention consists of two parts; a training session on self-management of chronic conditions for the healthcare professionals, and a paper-based tool for the patients. Both parts aim to inform and prepare the two parties as to what self-management entails in order to facilitate a constrictive consultation.
Control Group (not using Navigator Tool)
These participants will not have access to the Navigator Tool Intervention, and will have consultations with a healthcare professional who has not undergone the Self-management Awareness Training.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The Navigator Tool Intervention
The intervention consists of two parts; a training session on self-management of chronic conditions for the healthcare professionals, and a paper-based tool for the patients. Both parts aim to inform and prepare the two parties as to what self-management entails in order to facilitate a constrictive consultation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have experienced pain for more than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Being unable to attend consultations with a healthcare professional for the duration of the project
* Being currently participating in another research project regarding chronic pain
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Thistle Foundation
UNKNOWN
Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE)
UNKNOWN
Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation
UNKNOWN
Pain Concern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pamela F Bell, MB FFARCSI FFPMCAI FFPMRCA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pain Concern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Margaret's Health Centre
Auchterarder, Scotland, United Kingdom
Whitesands Medical Practice
Dunbar, Scotland, United Kingdom
St Triduana's Medical Practice
Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
Milngavie Clinic
Milngavie, Scotland, United Kingdom
Muirhead Medical Centre
Muirhead, Scotland, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
223092
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.