Urodynamic Studies Prior to Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT ID: NCT03107130

Last Updated: 2018-10-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

266 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This retrospective descriptive study is to determine what proportion of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates patients who underwent surgical management for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) would qualify for a basic office exam (BOE) alone, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial, and thus could have potentially had Urodynamic studies (UDS) omitted from their preoperative workup.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Urodynamic studies (UDS) are an assessment tool used to evaluate physiologic variables during bladder filling, bladder storage, and bladder emptying. They are commonly performed as part of the routine preoperative evaluation of women with symptoms of SUI. However, UDS are costly, with payments allowed by Medicare quoted at greater than $500, time consuming, uncomfortable, and have been shown to increase the risk of urinary tract infection. But most concerning is the fact that UDS have not been shown to improve surgical outcomes.

In 2012, the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial evaluated 630 women who underwent a basic office exam (BOE) or BOE plus UDS, and concluded that for women with uncomplicated, demonstrable SUI a BOE alone was not inferior to evaluation with UDS for outcomes at 1 year. This recent publication has resulted in urogynecology practices across the country evaluating their own standard of care when it comes to preoperative evaluation of SUI.

Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. standard practice is to perform UDS on all patients undergoing surgery for SUI. The providers of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. would be remiss if the providers did not follow this trend and evaluate their own personal practice of preoperative UDS in patients presenting with SUI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urodynamic Studies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SUI Surgery Patients in 2015

All women 18 years of age or older, who underwent surgery for SUI between January 2015 and December 2015

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All women 18 years of age or older
* Underwent surgery for SUI performed by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. between January 2015 and December 2015

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years old
* Concomitant surgery for anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TriHealth Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rachel Pauls, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, Zyczynski HM, Varner RE, Amundsen C, Sirls LT, Norton PA, Arisco AM, Chai TC, Zimmern P, Barber MD, Dandreo KJ, Menefee SA, Kenton K, Lowder J, Richter HE, Khandwala S, Nygaard I, Kraus SR, Johnson HW, Lemack GE, Mihova M, Albo ME, Mueller E, Sutkin G, Wilson TS, Hsu Y, Rozanski TA, Rickey LM, Rahn D, Tennstedt S, Kusek JW, Gormley EA; Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1987-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113595. Epub 2012 May 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22551104 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PFU vs. UDS in SUI
NCT06886997 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Urethral Vascularization and Urodynamics
NCT07185698 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA