A Trial to Improve the Healthiness of Packed Lunches in Primary School Aged Children
NCT ID: NCT03104777
Last Updated: 2020-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-09
2017-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computerised Decision-Support Tool for Childhood Obesity Management
NCT03819673
Lifestyle Interventions and Metabolic Profile in Obese Children
NCT03728621
Understanding the Impact of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) Labelling in Secondary Schools
NCT05623618
Testing the Veggie Brek Intervention
NCT05217550
Pediatric Healthy Weight Clinic
NCT05020314
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research shows that packed lunches are higher in sugar, salt and saturated fat than school meals. , Furthermore, the nutritional gap between packed lunches and school meals has widened since the introduction of the food-based standards for school meals in 2006. A cross sectional survey, assessing packed lunches of 1,294 children in 87 primary schools, found only 1% met the standards for school meals in England, with 82% containing restricted snacks, i.e., crisps or confectionary, and 61% including sugar sweetened drinks. Therefore, significantly improving the quality of packed lunches could be an important step to reducing childhood obesity rates in Derby.
Previous research has highlighted that improving the quality of packed lunches can be challenging. For example, a UK-wide randomised controlled trial found that a "SMART lunch box" intervention had a positive impact on certain food groups but failed to reduce the overall calories in lunchboxes. The intervention, which included an extensive set of approaches, e.g., lunch bags, food boxes, wall charts, food games and stickers, increased vegetables packed by 11% and decreased savoury snacks packed by 14%, but failed to reduce confectionary and sweetened drinks . Other interventions, using educational videos and incentives aimed at children, had similar small, yet positive effects over a 12-month period . However, research has shown that relatively small, sustained behavioural changes can have a big cumulative impact: reducing calorie consumption by just 30-100 calories a day would have a considerable effect on obesity levels . The small effects of previous studies also highlight the importance of robustly evaluating any approach that is introduced.
In order to reduce childhood obesity in Derby, primary schools are a key area to focus on. Research shows that packed lunches are higher in sugar, salt and saturated fat than school meals, and a survey found only 1% of packed lunches met the standards for school meals in England . Therefore, significantly improving the quality of packed lunches could be an important step to reducing childhood obesity rates in Derby.
This trial is designed to test whether a multiple component intervention, focused on parents and developed with an understanding of the drivers behind behaviour, can increase the healthiness of packed lunches brought into school by reducing the presence of unhealthy items.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Written consent was obtained from the Head Teacher in all participating schools.
Providing parents with information about the study is likely to change their behaviour and it will not be possible to assess whether the intervention itself has had an effect.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
No intervention materials will be distributed in the control schools during the intervention period.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention Group
Intervention materials will be distributed to parents of children in years 3 - 6.
Behaviourally Informed Intervention Materials
The intervention consists of 7 separate components. The intervention components are to be delivered at three time-points (referred to as bundles). The bundles consist of:
Bundle 1a - Letter to parents of children bringing a packed lunch to school, 'spot the difference' lunch box tag (attached to all lunchboxes) and a Handy Swaps Card.
Bundle 1b - Letter to parents of children only having school meals and a Handy Swaps Card.
Bundle 2 - Lunch box mixer with ideas for creating nutritious packed lunches. Bundle 3 - Shopping list, packed lunch planner and reward chart to support planning and monitoring progress.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Behaviourally Informed Intervention Materials
The intervention consists of 7 separate components. The intervention components are to be delivered at three time-points (referred to as bundles). The bundles consist of:
Bundle 1a - Letter to parents of children bringing a packed lunch to school, 'spot the difference' lunch box tag (attached to all lunchboxes) and a Handy Swaps Card.
Bundle 1b - Letter to parents of children only having school meals and a Handy Swaps Card.
Bundle 2 - Lunch box mixer with ideas for creating nutritious packed lunches. Bundle 3 - Shopping list, packed lunch planner and reward chart to support planning and monitoring progress.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children in Years 3-6
Exclusion Criteria
7 Years
11 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Derby City Council
UNKNOWN
University of Derby
OTHER
Public Health England
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tim Chadborn, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Public Health England
Amanda K Bunten, Doctorate
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Public Health England
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amanda Bunten
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Derby Packed Lunch Trial
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.