CT-Perfusion for Neurological Diagnostic Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT03098511

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

333 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-25

Study Completion Date

2024-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For the purpose of organ donation after neurological determination of death (NDD), death must be declared using a set of standardized clinical criteria. When a full clinical evaluation cannot be completed, additional neuroimaging ancillary testing is required. The ideal ancillary test for NDD would demonstrate no cerebral blood flow, be free of false-positive and false negative results, rapid, safe, readily available, non-invasive, and inexpensive. No current ancillary test for NDD meets these criteria. Computed tomography (CT) perfusion has the characteristics of an ideal test for NDD, but has not been evaluated for routine clinical use for NDD.

The overarching goal of this project is to improve the NDD process by establishing CT-perfusion as the ideal ancillary test. A large prospective Canadian multi-centre diagnostic cohort study will be conducted to validate CT-perfusion for the neurological determination of death.

Specific objectives are:

Primary objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy of CT-perfusion compared to complete clinical evaluation for NDD.

Secondary objectives: 1) To confirm the safety of performing CT-perfusion in critically ill patients suspected of being neurologically deceased; 2) To establish the CT-perfusion inter-rater reliability for NDD; 3) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT-angiography compared to complete clinical evaluation and to CT-perfusion for NDD; 4) To describe the clearance of commonly used sedatives and narcotics in the setting of NDD; and 5) to investigate biological changes (inflammatory and nanovesicles) that occur in humans during the brain dying process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will conduct a large prospective Canadian multi-centre diagnostic cohort study. The primary diagnostic test evaluated will be CT-perfusion. The reference standard will be the complete clinical evaluation of brainstem functions. Comatose patients at high risk of neurological death exempt of confounding factors (e.g. hypothermic patients, use of long-acting sedatives, etc.) will be included. All patients will undergo CT-perfusion of the head (with CT-angiography reconstructions) followed by a complete NDD assessment. Both CT-perfusion and the clinical exam will be performed by independent assessors blinded from each others' interpretation. The primary endpoints will be the sensitivity and specificity of CT-perfusion to confirm NDD. Safety endpoints will be CT-perfusion -related adverse events (i.e. contrast-induced kidney injury, new hemodynamic instability while undergoing CT-perfusion). The true negative, true positive, false negative and false positive for CT-angiography obtained from the CT-perfusion source images when compared to the reference standard as well as when compared to the CT-Perfusion will also be reported. The sensitivity and specificity of CT-angiography compared to the reference standard and to CT-perfusion along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Individual patient and population pharmacokinetics of analgesics and sedatives will be determined. To better investigate the impact of residual circulating sedative or narcotic levels on the accuracy of CT-Perfusion and CT-Angiography, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves for varying levels of narcotic or sedative thresholds and compute the ROC area under the curve for each threshold will be plotted. To assess the immune phenotype, peripheral blood mononuclear cells activation will be evaluated by flow cytometry and cytokines by multiplex analyses. Nanovesicles fraction will be isolated from the plasma by ultracentrifugation and antigenic content and enzymatic activity. The plasma will finally be analysed by ELISAs and multiplex analyses to determine the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurological Determination of Death

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

1. Participant will be comatose
2. Care providers, investigators and outcome assessors will be blinded from the results of the CT-Perfusion scan result (for the clinical assessment) and from the clinical assessment results (for the CT-Perfusion scan interpretation)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurological Diagnostic Evaluation

Exams performed according to a determined schedule following admission in the intensive care unit in order to validate CT-perfusion as an accurate ancillary test for neurological diagnostic.

Group Type OTHER

Neurological Diagnostic Evaluation

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Clinical Data:

* Demographic data
* Daily data (clinical exams, laboratory data)
* Drug administration
* Additional clinical or ancillary neurological determination test

Diagnostic Intervention:

* CT-Perfusion
* CT-Angiography reconstructions

Reference Standard:

\- Clinical Neurological Exam

Blood Samples (Pharmacokinetics, Inflammatory \& Nanovesicles Parameters):

* At the time of patient enrolment
* 6 hours after patient enrolment
* At the time of the clinical neurological exam

Secondary Outcome measures at 6 months:

* extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSe)
* modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neurological Diagnostic Evaluation

Clinical Data:

* Demographic data
* Daily data (clinical exams, laboratory data)
* Drug administration
* Additional clinical or ancillary neurological determination test

Diagnostic Intervention:

* CT-Perfusion
* CT-Angiography reconstructions

Reference Standard:

\- Clinical Neurological Exam

Blood Samples (Pharmacokinetics, Inflammatory \& Nanovesicles Parameters):

* At the time of patient enrolment
* 6 hours after patient enrolment
* At the time of the clinical neurological exam

Secondary Outcome measures at 6 months:

* extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSe)
* modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults 18 years and older
2. Admitted in the intensive care unit with a brain injury
3. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) = 3
4. Sedation stopped for at least 6 hours

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with the following contraindications to CT-perfusion will be excluded from the study:

* Pregnancy
* Contrast allergy
* Clinician refuses inclusion because of kidney injury.
2. Patients with any of the following confounding factors precluding complete clinical neurological evaluation will be excluded from the study:

* Cervical fracture above C6
* Significant facial trauma limiting cranial nerve examination
* Hypothermia \< 34 °C
* Use of intravenous barbiturates at any time since admission
* Unresuscitated shock
* Peripheral nerve or muscle dysfunction or neuromuscular blockade potentially accounting for unresponsiveness
* Anoxic brain injury \< 24h (or 72h if therapeutic hypothermia)
* Attending physician disagrees to conduct an apnea test
* Any other abnormalities deemed a confounding factor for NDD by the attending clinician
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michaël Chassé, MD PhD FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Jai JS Shankar, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manitoba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

William Osler Health System

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health Sciences Center

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St-Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHU de Québec - Université Laval

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE 16.379

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.