Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2443 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-10
2020-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Vanadis® NIPT for Non-invasive Prenatal Screening of Trisomies (T21, T18 and T13)
NCT03559374
Clinical Performance of NIPT in Multiple Gestation Pregnancies
NCT04488393
A New Prenatal Blood Test for Down Syndrome
NCT00877292
PErsonalized Genomics for Prenatal Abnormalities Screening USing Maternal Blood
NCT03831256
Clinical Evaluation of the SEQureDx Trisomy Test in Low Risk Pregnancies
NCT01597063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The 'high risk' (HR) group - 250 women considering diagnostic testing, nearly all following a positive cell free (cf)DNA screening test. At least one case of Down syndrome should be detected for every three women enrolled, in addition to an occasional case of T18 or T13.
* The 'low risk' (LR) group - 2,400 women having conventional cfDNA screening as their primary screening test (i.e., no serum/ultrasound testing), representing the general pregnancy population. Their group risk of Down syndrome should be about 1:500. This group should have no more than 20% women age 35 and older. (Women whose conventional cfDNA screen is positive would then be eligible for a second enrollment in the 'high risk' group).
Both groups of women will be asked to provide three full 10mL Streck tubes of blood (two tubes minimum), agree to release limited clinical information, provide signed consent (including for FDA personnel to review records) and consent to have Enrollment Site staff review and report needed information from newborn/infant examination records, if requested. Identifiable patient information will be held at Enrollment Sites and not released to the Laboratory or Study Center. Sample and outcome information will be identified only by a unique study code. Individual cfDNA test results will not be returned to the Enrollment Sites, providers, or enrolled women. Enrollment Sites will receive a summary of results once the study ends.
Enrollment Sites are likely to enroll either HR or LR women, although a few sites may be able to enroll both. Both settings will have genetic counselors, physicians, research assistants or other medical staff available to identify, inform, consent and enroll women, as well as to collect and ship samples and obtain pregnancy outcome information. Staff designated as participating in the VALUE Study will be qualified to inform eligible women of the study's benefits and harms, and collect/document informed consent (which will remain at that site). The Study Center may request confirmation of consent, should it become necessary. Outcomes for HR women choosing diagnostic testing will be the results of the karyotype; those declining diagnostic testing will have newborn/infant information collected( often a newborn karyotype). In the LR population, a negative cfDNA test result will be accepted as ruling out a common autosomal trisomy, as the residual risk would be very low (\<1:20,000 to \< 1:50,000). For LR women with a positive cfDNA test, results of diagnostic testing would be requested. If diagnostic test results are unavailable, a review of the newborn examination/karyotype will be required for confirmation. Any conflicting results between the clinical tests and the VALUE Study results(false positive / false negative) would also require resolution that may involve review of newborn/infant records.
The VALUE Study intends to enroll approximately 2,400 LR women through as many as 8 LR Enrollment Sites associated with general risk obstetrical care practices. The 2,400 target is set to: 1) provide a reasonably confident estimate of an expected low false positive rate (e.g., 0.2%) and 2) provide sufficient numbers to exercise the testing platform over a 12 month time period. The target of 2,400 is large enough to meet both objectives and is slightly more than the largest number of euploid samples tested in any of the original NGS HR cfDNA validation studies (2011-2012). The number of trisomies detected in this LR group should be fewer than 10.An estimated 2% (48) of these LR women will have a failed/no call cfDNA test..
Sample handling:
Plasma samples could be tested fresh or stored and tested once the assay system has been validated. Outcome information will not be collected from Enrollment Sites until samples have been tested, ensuring blinding of laboratory to outcomes.
Timeframe:
Identification of Enrollment Sites and securing Investigational Review Board (IRB) approval will take three months. Efforts related to set-up and qualification of the testing laboratory is expected to take four to six months as will study-specific software development. Active enrollment is scheduled for 12 months. The intent is to run the majority of samples fresh, allowing for long-term assay variability to be studied. Follow-up will be completed, for the most part, within two months of the final testing (except for the small proportion of women who tested positive but did not have diagnostic testing). These will have outcomes confirmed at the time of delivery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low Risk
The Low Risk group will consist of 2,400 pregnancies with no high risk findings (e.g., abnormal ultrasound, positive serum screen) who are undergoing initial clinical cfDNA screening. To simulate a general pregnancy population, approximately 20% of these women will be age 35 and older. An estimated 2% (48) of these LR women will have a failed/no call cfDNA test. Consenting women will provide samples for SmartNIPT testing.
SmartNIPT
A novel, non-next generation sequencing (NGS) test that is designed to perform as well as conventional NGS screening while being simpler and less expensive.
High Risk
The High Risk group will consist of 250 women with a positive cfDNA screen reported by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-approved commercial laboratory, and who present for consideration of a confirmatory diagnostic test, (i.e., CVS or amniocentesis). Consenting women will provide samples for SmartNIPT testing.
SmartNIPT
A novel, non-next generation sequencing (NGS) test that is designed to perform as well as conventional NGS screening while being simpler and less expensive.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SmartNIPT
A novel, non-next generation sequencing (NGS) test that is designed to perform as well as conventional NGS screening while being simpler and less expensive.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 10-20 weeks gestation
* Low Risk group
* no known aneuploidy risk
* scheduled for cfDNA screen as primary aneuploidy screen
* High Risk group
* positive cfDNA screen
* scheduled to discuss CVS/amniocentesis as confirmatory test
Exclusion Criteria
* Low Risk group
* positive nuchal translucency (NT) or abnormal ultrasound
* previous pregnancy with aneuploidy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
PerkinElmer, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Glenn E Palomaki, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Fetal Medicine
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Bridgeport Hospital
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Northwestern Memorial Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
South Shore Hospital
South Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Womens Health Care Group
Oaks, Pennsylvania, United States
Magee Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Texas
Houston, Texas, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
North York General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GenoScience Diagnostic
Québec, Quebec, Canada
University of Genoa - Hospital San Martino
Genova, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dahl F, Ericsson O, Karlberg O, Karlsson F, Howell M, Persson F, Roos F, Stenberg J, Ahola T, Alftren I, Andersson B, Barkenas E, Brandner B, Dahlberg J, Elfman S, Eriksson M, Forsgren PO, Francois N, Gousseva A, Hakamali F, Janfalk-Carlsson A, Johansson H, Lundgren J, Mohsenchian A, Olausson L, Olofsson S, Qureshi A, Skarpas B, Savneby A, Astrom E, Ohman O, Westgren M, Kopp-Kallner H, Fianu-Jonasson A, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides K. Imaging single DNA molecules for high precision NIPT. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22606-0.
Ericsson O, Ahola T, Dahl F, Karlsson F, Persson F, Karlberg O, Roos F, Alftren I, Andersson B, Barkenas E, Boghos A, Brandner B, Dahlberg J, Forsgren PO, Francois N, Gousseva A, Hakamali F, Janfalk-Carlsson A, Johansson H, Lundgren J, Mohsenchian A, Olausson L, Olofsson S, Qureshi A, Skarpas B, Svahn P, Savneby A, Astrom E, Sahlberg A, Fianu-Jonasson A, Gautier J, Costa JM, Jacobsson B, Nicolaides K. Clinical validation of a novel automated cell-free DNA screening assay for trisomies 21, 13, and 18 in maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn. 2019 Oct;39(11):1011-1015. doi: 10.1002/pd.5528. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
Palomaki GE, Eklund EE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM. Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening. Clin Chem. 2022 Nov 3;68(11):1449-1458. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac131.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
940244
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.