Pulp Revascularization Versus MTA Apexification

NCT ID: NCT03083015

Last Updated: 2017-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-06

Study Completion Date

2015-12-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compared the efficiency of pulp revascularization and MTA apexification in the treatment of patients with necrotic immature anterior teeth.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

the participants with 66 anterior necrotic immature teeth were randomly assigned into two equal groups with 33 teeth per each, according to regeneration and MTA apexification. At the first visit, all teeth were accessed and irrigated with NaOCl then a TAP was applied as intra-appointment intracanal medication. At the second visit, after removal of the medication with the irrigation, bleeding was initiated into the canal and isolated by the MTA in the orifice in the regeneration group. While in the Apexification group, the MTA was packed apically and all teeth were finally restored with resin composite restorations. The patients were recalled after 1, 3, 6, and 9 months for clinical and radiographic follow up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Necrotic Pulp

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

participants are allocated at random to receive one of two interventions according to the research plan. In RCT the outcomes are measured, so it is considered a quantitative study . This trial conforms to the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)statement.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
For the allocation concealment mechanism, each of 66 papers (each paper was eight folded) numbered from 1 to 66 were, individually packed, in opaque envelopes. Each participant picked an envelope at the beginning of the second visit. The number in the envelope determined which procedure was to be performed for the patient. The partner was to decide the procedure for the operator according to that number.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Revascularization

Blood clot initiation and grey MTA ( Mineral Tri-oxide Aggregate) cervically compacted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

revascularization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a sterile sharp needle was used to irritate the apical tissue until bleeding occurred apically in the root canal space so as to create a biological scaffold for the regenerative process

Apexfication

Apexification using grey MTA apically compacted without mechanical preparation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Apexification

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

a 3-5 mm thickness of MTA using a hand plugger and was verified radiographically.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

revascularization

a sterile sharp needle was used to irritate the apical tissue until bleeding occurred apically in the root canal space so as to create a biological scaffold for the regenerative process

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Apexification

a 3-5 mm thickness of MTA using a hand plugger and was verified radiographically.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

regeneration

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medically-free patients having immature necrotic anterior teeth (with or without apical periodontitis/abscess) even with previous intervention.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of allergy to any of the antibiotics in the tri-mix used in the study
* Patients with systemic diseases e.g. Diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders,…
* Psychological disturbance
* External / internal root resorption or cystic lesion.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Enas Ebrahim Sayed

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Enas Ebrahim Sayed

Dentist at ministry of health

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ahmed alkhadem, lecturer

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

evidence based center, Cairo University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saoud TM, Zaazou A, Nabil A, Moussa S, Lin LM, Gibbs JL. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of traumatized immature permanent necrotic teeth after revascularization/revitalization therapy. J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.023. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25443280 (View on PubMed)

Alobaid AS, Cortes LM, Lo J, Nguyen TT, Albert J, Abu-Melha AS, Lin LM, Gibbs JL. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of the treatment of immature permanent teeth by revascularization or apexification: a pilot retrospective cohort study. J Endod. 2014 Aug;40(8):1063-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25069909 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

cebd

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Revas1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.