Implementation of Psychological Treatment in Generalized Anxiety

NCT ID: NCT03079336

Last Updated: 2022-05-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2022-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pragmatic randomized controlled trial (expected N = 80) of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to contrast two psychotherapeutic implementation strategies (State-of-the-Art welcome phase vs. prolonged focus on sudden changes). Blinded allocation of implementation strategy for patients; open label for therapists (no blinding possible), randomized allocation for patients, therapist allocation via ABAB-design (crossed-therapist design). Post treatment self-reported outcome will be measured based on a latent outcome factor (i. e. "outcome composite").

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

State of research. The proposed trial has a common theme, i.e., the understanding of the enduring efficacy of psychological treatments in individuals who suffer from general anxiety disorder (GAD). There is meta-analytic evidence that bona fide psychotherapy is an effective treatment for GAD, but also for individuals that suffers from anxiety and depression. Nonetheless, in spite of the empirical evidence of the overall efficacy, there is a lack of randomized controlled studies that systematically investigate the therapists' variability (i. e. therapist effects) within the very same treatment protocol. The development of study designs to investigate potential health professional effects along treatment effects is a general claim for human interventions. This protocol includes one of the very first process-outcome trials in GAD that systematically examine theory-based patients' and therapists' characteristics simultaneously using longitudinal multilevel methodology.

Along with investigating therapist and patient characteristics, two methods for timing the check-in phase at the beginning of each session will be compared by keeping constant the standardized treatment manual for patients with GAD: (a) prolonged focus on subtle changes check-in condition lasting from 7 to 20 minutes and (b) a state of the art (SOA) check-in phase lasting from 5 to 10 minutes. To address the nested data structure, therapists will be allocated by a single-subject ABAB-design. A total of 80 patients (40 participants in each of the two conditions) with a primary GAD diagnosis will be treated by 20 advanced cognitive-behavioral therapy trainees at the psychotherapy outpatient clinic in the department of psychology at the university of Zürich.

Relevance. (a) Study population. GAD is a neglected disorder in the Swiss mental health system. GAD is associated with personal suffering, a reduced quality of life, and high economic costs. (b) Design development. Systematic integration of potential therapist effects is a neglected aspect in many areas of evidence-based human interventions (inside but also outside of psychological interventions). (c) Treatment development. Evidence-based treatments are usually far from being fully efficacious. There is a debate about innovative research agendas and how to foster the efficacy of such treatments. (d) Experimental process-outcome research. There is a need for future research to investigate theory-based therapist effects and in-session timing within rigorous experimental process-outcome research designs to better understand the factors involved in therapeutic change (e.g. http://www.nature.com/news/therapy-deficit-1.11477).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

State of the art (SOTA) check-in phase

The therapists will apply the usual SOTA check-in phase lasting between 5 and 10 minutes, as recommended in the preexisting guideline including reviewing progress in self-help and agenda setting (Zinbarg et al., 2006).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation - SOTA

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The implementation of an evidence-based treatment is largely principle-based - allowing considerable therapeutic flexibility in determining and timing of different treatment aspects. In this condition progress, subtle changes and sudden gains may be an explicit topic and there is no restraint to avoid such topics. However, the therapists are not obligated to take a systematized focus on potential subtle changes and they may use the timing of the sessions to involve the patients into the other tasks of therapy.

Mastery your Anxiety and Worry (MAW)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In the present study, the MAW-packet will be applied within a usual 16-session individual therapy format and up to 3 further booster sessions.

The session format of 50-60 minute usually consists of (a) a check-in phase of 5 to 15 minutes that includes a patients welcoming, reviewing self-help and agenda setting, (b) a working phase around 35-45 minutes that focuses on the previously agreed session goals, (c) a feedback phase of 5 to 10 minutes that summarizes the session and previews the upcoming self-help assignment.

Prolonged focus on subtle changes

Based on the robust findings that over 90% of the patients will experience subtle changes, the therapists will extend the above mentioned check-in phase by systematized focus for 7 to 20 minutes capitalizing on small and subtle changes and exceptions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation - Prolonged focus on changes

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Systematized sequence of exploration of subtle changes at a prolonged check-in phase: (1) the precise change situation, (2) related emotional states, (3) related helpful thoughts and self-verbalizations, (4) reinforcement of generalized self-efficacy and treatment motivation, (5) benefit for the upcoming session goals (Flückiger, Grosse Holtforth, et al. 2013, 2014).

Mastery your Anxiety and Worry (MAW)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In the present study, the MAW-packet will be applied within a usual 16-session individual therapy format and up to 3 further booster sessions.

The session format of 50-60 minute usually consists of (a) a check-in phase of 5 to 15 minutes that includes a patients welcoming, reviewing self-help and agenda setting, (b) a working phase around 35-45 minutes that focuses on the previously agreed session goals, (c) a feedback phase of 5 to 10 minutes that summarizes the session and previews the upcoming self-help assignment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation - SOTA

The implementation of an evidence-based treatment is largely principle-based - allowing considerable therapeutic flexibility in determining and timing of different treatment aspects. In this condition progress, subtle changes and sudden gains may be an explicit topic and there is no restraint to avoid such topics. However, the therapists are not obligated to take a systematized focus on potential subtle changes and they may use the timing of the sessions to involve the patients into the other tasks of therapy.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Implementation - Prolonged focus on changes

Systematized sequence of exploration of subtle changes at a prolonged check-in phase: (1) the precise change situation, (2) related emotional states, (3) related helpful thoughts and self-verbalizations, (4) reinforcement of generalized self-efficacy and treatment motivation, (5) benefit for the upcoming session goals (Flückiger, Grosse Holtforth, et al. 2013, 2014).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mastery your Anxiety and Worry (MAW)

In the present study, the MAW-packet will be applied within a usual 16-session individual therapy format and up to 3 further booster sessions.

The session format of 50-60 minute usually consists of (a) a check-in phase of 5 to 15 minutes that includes a patients welcoming, reviewing self-help and agenda setting, (b) a working phase around 35-45 minutes that focuses on the previously agreed session goals, (c) a feedback phase of 5 to 10 minutes that summarizes the session and previews the upcoming self-help assignment.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. fulfill the diagnostic criteria for GAD based on the structured interview for DSM,
2. are 18 years of age or older,
3. Mastery of German language
4. are seeking out a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for GAD at the outpatient clinic (Attenhoferstrasse 9) of the Institute for Psychology of the University of Zürich
5. Informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute Suicidal Ideation (BDI Suicide item \> 1 or suicidal ideation in the telephone interview)
2. Currently taking a psychotic or bipolar disorder medication, or
3. Currently receiving treatment from a professional psychotherapist/psychiatrist.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christoph Flueckiger, Prof Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Psychology, University of Zürich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Psychology, University of Zürich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fluckiger C, Visla A, Wolfer C, Hilpert P, Zinbarg RE, Lutz W, Grosse Holtforth M, Allemand M. Exploring change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder-A two-arms ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 May;89(5):454-468. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000639. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33829819 (View on PubMed)

Visla A, Allemand M, Fluckiger C. Within- and between-patients associations between self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and symptom change in cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychol. 2023 Jan;79(1):86-104. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23407. Epub 2022 Jul 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35781807 (View on PubMed)

Visla A, Constantino MJ, Fluckiger C. Predictors of change in patient treatment outcome expectation during cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2021 Jun;58(2):219-229. doi: 10.1037/pst0000371.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34410791 (View on PubMed)

Fluckiger C, Horvath AO, Brandt H. The evolution of patients' concept of the alliance and its relation to outcome: A dynamic latent-class structural equation modeling approach. J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):51-62. doi: 10.1037/cou0000555. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34197151 (View on PubMed)

Fluckiger C, Wolfer C, Held J, Hilpert P, Rubel J, Allemand M, Zinbarg RE, Visla A. How to customize a bona fide psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A two-arms, patient blinded, ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial design [IMPLEMENT 2.0]. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1666-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29614982 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PP00P1_163702

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physical Exercise Augmented CBT for GAD
NCT02690441 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA