Comparison of Aerosol Delivery of Infasurf to Usual Care in Spontaneously Breathing RDS Patients

NCT ID: NCT03058666

Last Updated: 2024-05-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

477 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-29

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study to test the hypothesis that aerosolized Infasurf can decrease the need for intubation and instillation of liquid surfactant to the airway.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment will not be masked. The study objective is to document that aerosolized Infasurf is superior to "usual care" and provides for some patients effective surfactant therapy with less need for endotracheal intubation and instillation of a surfactant suspension into the airway. Two cohorts will be recruited: (a) patients who did not receive surfactant at birth who develop RDS in the first hours of life and (b) patients who received instillation of surfactant for RDS in the first hour of life, were extubated, and have continuing RDS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aerosolized Calfactant

1. NICU Patients with a clinical diagnosis of RDS
2. Inspired oxygen ≥21% to maintain adequate oxygen saturation
3. Not Intubated
4. Requiring Nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aerosolized Calfactant

Intervention Type DRUG

Aerosolization of Infasurf at 6ml/kg via the modified Solarys aerosol generator.

Solarys

Intervention Type DEVICE

Aerosolization of Infasurf at 6ml/kg via the modified Solarys aerosol generator.

Usual Care

There will be no protocol driven interventions in the usual care group.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aerosolized Calfactant

Aerosolization of Infasurf at 6ml/kg via the modified Solarys aerosol generator.

Intervention Type DRUG

Solarys

Aerosolization of Infasurf at 6ml/kg via the modified Solarys aerosol generator.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Infasurf Calfactant

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

RDS Patients

1. NICU patient, ≥1hour of age and \<24 hours of age.
2. Clinical diagnosis of RDS, with or without chest X-ray data.
3. Inspired oxygen ≥21% to maintain adequate oxygen saturation.
4. Not intubated
5. Requiring:

1. nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Congenital anomaly limiting care options or requiring early surgery.
2. Cardiopulmonary decompensation.

1. hypotension with metabolic acidosis (base excess \< -10 meq/l).
2. Oxygen saturations \< 88% at start of aerosolization.
3. PaCO2 ≥ 60 mmHg at start of aerosolization.
3. Grade 3 or Grade 4 intraventricular hemorrhage by cranial ultrasound, if known.
4. Acute hypoxic encephalopathy with or without seizures.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Hour

Maximum Eligible Age

24 Hours

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ONY

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Cummings, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Albany Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

USA Children's & Women's Hospital

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Baptist Hospital of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Adventist Healthcare System, Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida, Tampa general

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Columbus Regional Hospital

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

OSF Saint Francis Medical Center

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kentucky Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital and Clinics

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Minnesota

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Sisters of Charity Hospital

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Pitt County Memorial Hospital

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Jackson-Madison County General Hospital

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt university Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

North central Baptist Hospital

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Timpanogos Regional Medical Center

Orem, Utah, United States

Site Status

Utah Valley Hospital

Provo, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Virgina Medical Center

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cummings JJ, Gerday E, Minton S, Katheria A, Albert G, Flores-Torres J, Famuyide M, Lampland A, Guthrie S, Kuehn D, Weitkamp JH, Fort P, Abu Jawdeh EG, Ryan RM, Martin GC, Swanson JR, Mulrooney N, Eyal F, Gerstmann D, Kumar P, Wilding GE, Egan EA; AERO-02 STUDY INVESTIGATORS. Aerosolized Calfactant for Newborns With Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2020 Nov;146(5):e20193967. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3967. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33060258 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Aero-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aerosol Inhalation Treatment for Dyspnea
NCT01440764 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2