Therapeutic Effect of Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.
NCT ID: NCT03054610
Last Updated: 2020-05-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are a great variety of treatments for this pathology, of these, one of the most common is the use of intralesional steroids, which a weighing that reduces symptomatology in many cases also has undesirable effects such as subcutaneous fat atrophy, rupture of the plantar fascia, peripheral nerve injury, muscle damage and stress fractures. Other treatments are extracorporeal shock waves, application of platelet-rich plasma and application of botulinum toxin A intralesional. All of them are accompanied by insoles, night splints and stretching exercises of the Achilles tendon and the plantar fascia.
Recent studies have shown that the application of botulinum toxin A intralesional in patients with plantar fasciitis helps to improve the symptomatology to decrease pain in both intensity and presentation time. Decreased inflammation of the plantar fascia has also been demonstrated. This is the sale of the usual form of action of the botulinum toxin, which is applied regularly in the muscles to block the release of acetylcholine in the neuromuscular plaque and obtain its relaxation and not directly in the pain points. We believe that the botulinum toxin can be applied intralesional currently, since there is information that the toxin has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect and not just muscle relaxation.
The aim of our work demonstrate that the use of botulinum toxin A and intralesional stretching exercises is superior to intralesional steroids and stretching trying to establish a safer and less painful therapy avoiding complications prior to the application of steroid application.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin vs. Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Refractory Plantar Fasciitis
NCT05367271
Botulinum Toxin A Versus Steroids for the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
NCT02196155
Evaluating the Safety and Effect of abobotulinumtoxinA in the Gastrocnemius Muscle to Improve Equinus and Plantar Fasciitis Pain
NCT03978234
Treatment of Gastrocnemius Tightness and Subsequent Chronic Plantar Fasciitis with Botulinum Toxin a
NCT05218785
Phase 2 DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Management of Plantar Fasciitis
NCT03137407
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The plantar fascia function is to prevent foot collapse by its anatomical orientation and by its tensile forces; It originates at the base of the calcaneus and extends distally to the phalanges. The plantar fascia stretching prevents the displacement of the calcaneus and the metatarsals and maintains the medial longitudinal arch. Simulates a cable attached to the calcaneus and metatarsophalangeal joints. The windlass mechanism described by Hicks, for the action of the plantar fascia is usually explained when a dorsiflexion of the fingers occurs, this leads to an effective shortening of the length of the plantar fascia causing an elevation of the arch. The extension of the fingers increases the arch of tension with the metatarsophalangeal joint as axis or anchor point. The shortening of the plantar fascia resulting from the dorsiflexion of the hallux is the essence of the windlass mechanism. When a fasciotomy is performed, this mechanism is lost, decreasing the stability of the arch and this does not allow a phase of stable terminal stay.
Historically the development of plantar fasciitis is attributed to biomechanical defects such as hyperpronation, this contributes to excesive mobility of the foot, which increases the stress applied to the musculofascial structures and soft tissue through an elongation of plantar fascia. There are other studies that have shown that one of the main factors for the appearance of this disease is the mechanical overload and it has been reported that the tension necessary for the rupture of the windlass mechanism ranges from 1.4 to 3.4 of the body weight of the subject.
There is a great variety of therapies reported for the treatment of this pathology, intralesional application of steroids, platelet-rich plasma, intralesional botulinum toxin A, treatments such as extracorporeal shock waves, all of which are assisted by stretching excercises of the gastrocnemius and sole muscles or stretching of the plantar fascia.
The clinical use of botulinum toxin A has expanded beyond the original indications by its effects on cholinergic neurons. The increased interest in the potential role to treat conditions of chronic pain is partially based on the effects of the toxin on the modulation of the release of substance P, on the calcitonin-related gene peptide and glutamate. On the other hand, the toxin has shown its effect on the inhibition of inflamatory pain and on the release of neurotransmitters from primary sensory neurons in a rat model. It also inhibits peripheral sensitization, which leads to an indirect decrease in central sensitization. It is unclear whether the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with botulinum toxin A works by causing muscle paralysis or by analgesic anti-inflamatory effects or by both mechanisms. A combined effect, induction of paresia of the muscles originating in the medial calcaneus process and direct analgesia due to analgesic anti-inflamatory properties.
We performed a previous study, where we compared the use of botulinum toxin A against intralesional steroids; The application of botulinum toxin A was performed in the twin and sole muscle wombs, while dexamethasone was applied in the area of greatest fascia pain. Patients who received botulinum toxin had a faster and more sustained improvement than patients who received steroids.
Another common form of treatment for plantar fasciitis is the application of intralesional steroids; however, there are reports of complications associated with these drugs and one of the main ones is the rupture of the plantar fascia, which ranges from 2.4% to 5.7% ; Despite pain relief due to rupture, many patients have other associated complications such as lateral plantar nerve dysfunction, stress fractures, among others, mainly after 2 applications.
Objective and originality: The aim of our study is to demonstrate that the use of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of plantar fasciitis is superior to treatment with intralesional steroids. We try to establish a safer and less painful treatment therapy for the patient, since the use of steroids is associated with complications. We believe that the botulinum toxin A can also be applied intralesional, since there is information that indicates that this toxin has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect in its local application and not only by the action of muscle relaxation by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junctions.
General objective:
To assess the therapeutic effect of botulinum toxin A in patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis.
Hypothesis:
The application of botulinum toxin A presents better results in the treatment of plantar fascitis than the use of intralesional steroids.
Material and Methods:
All patients who are recruited for the study will be explained regarding the treatment protocol, and will also sign informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Measurement of the plantar fascia using ultrasound and measurement of ranges of movement of ankle flexion, as well as measuring and weighing patients to know their body mass index. They will be randomized into one of three treatment groups. Group 1 (control) treatment with 5 ml of anesthetic (Ropivacaine 7.5%), Group 2 (steroids) application of 1ml of Betamethasone plus 3 ml of local anesthetic and Group 3 (botulinum toxin A) 250 U, in the insertion zone of the plantar fascia. All patients will receive a detailed explanation of the stretching exercises of the plantar fascia, as well as their frequency and duration. Afterwards, the patients will be evaluated by a blinded investigator, at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after infiltration; evaluation scales will be applied: Visual Analogue Scale (EVA), Maryland Foot \& Ankle Score, Foot \& Ankle Outcome Score (AOFAS), Foot \& Ankle Disability Index (FADI).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
5 ml of local anesthetic (ropivacaine 7.5%)
Ropivacaine
Steroid
1ml of steroid Betamethason Sodium Phosphate (Celestone®) and local anesthetic (ropivacaine 7.5%)
Betamethason Sodium Phosphate
Ropivacaine
BTX-A
200U Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Betamethason Sodium Phosphate
Ropivacaine
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who agreed to be part of the study and signed informed consent.
* Patients older than 18 years.
* Patients with two or more weeks of evolution.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological abnormalities: mental retardation or some psychiatric abnormality.
* Pregnant patients.
* Previous surgery on the heel.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carlos A Acosta-Olivo
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Acosta-Olivo, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Irving DB, Cook JL, Menz HB. Factors associated with chronic plantar heel pain: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2006 May;9(1-2):11-22; discussion 23-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002 Apr;36(2):95-101. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95.
May TJ, Judy TA, Conti M, Cowan JE. Current treatment of plantar fasciitis. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2002 Oct;1(5):278-84. doi: 10.1249/00149619-200210000-00005.
Kim C, Cashdollar MR, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Fuge L. Incidence of plantar fascia ruptures following corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Dec;3(6):335-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640010378530. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb;19(2):91-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900207.
Glazer JL. An approach to the diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Phys Sportsmed. 2009 Jun;37(2):74-9. doi: 10.3810/psm.2009.06.1712.
Sampson S, Gerhardt M, Mandelbaum B. Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Dec;1(3-4):165-74. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9032-5.
Rompe JD, Cacchio A, Weil L Jr, Furia JP, Haist J, Reiners V, Schmitz C, Maffulli N. Plantar fascia-specific stretching versus radial shock-wave therapy as initial treatment of plantar fasciopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2514-22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01651.
Soomekh DJ. Current concepts for the use of platelet-rich plasma in the foot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011 Jan;28(1):155-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2010.09.001.
Digiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Malay DP, Graci PA, Williams TT, Wilding GE, Baumhauer JF. Plantar fascia-specific stretching exercise improves outcomes in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. A prospective clinical trial with two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1775-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01281.
Tsai WC, Hsu CC, Chen CP, Chen MJ, Yu TY, Chen YJ. Plantar fasciitis treated with local steroid injection: comparison between sonographic and palpation guidance. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006 Jan;34(1):12-6. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20177.
Placzek R, Deuretzbacher G, Meiss AL. Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with Botulinum toxin A: preliminary clinical results. Clin J Pain. 2006 Feb;22(2):190-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000169674.34191.0e.
Seyler TM, Smith BP, Marker DR, Ma J, Shen J, Smith TL, Mont MA, Kolaski K, Koman LA. Botulinum neurotoxin as a therapeutic modality in orthopaedic surgery: more than twenty years of experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4:133-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00901. No abstract available.
Elizondo-Rodriguez J, Araujo-Lopez Y, Moreno-Gonzalez JA, Cardenas-Estrada E, Mendoza-Lemus O, Acosta-Olivo C. A comparison of botulinum toxin a and intralesional steroids for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double-blinded study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460215.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OR15-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.