Botulinum Toxin A Versus Steroids for the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

NCT ID: NCT02196155

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Plantar fasciitis is the classic and most common type of heel pain. Considering the costs for health care and the temporary disability not only for work, plantar fasciitis results in a substantial (and at least partially unnecessary) burden for the Swiss health care system and national economics.

Nonoperative treatment is the mainstay of treating plantar fasciitis. However, so far no treatment has proven to be superior to others, and there is national and international lack of consensus of how to treat plantar fasciitis best.

The investigators believe that the BTX-A injection in the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscles is currently the most promising non-operative approach, because it is considered to treat the disease at its origin (temporary weakening of the tight triceps surae muscle) as opposed to simply alleviate the symptoms (e.g. plantar cortisone and other injections, ESWT).

However, to date there is no evidence in the literature that compares the new, promising technique of BTX-A injection into the gastroc-soleus complex to a sham (saline) injection and to the gold standard steroid injection at the plantar fascia insertion site. With the intended study, this gap is going to be closed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background

Plantar fasciitis is the classic and most common type of heel pain. Extrapolating the rate of 2 million or 0.6% of the US American population being treated for plantar fasciitis every year to Switzerland, the corresponding number of patients would amount to 50'000 patients being treated for plantar fasciitis. Considering the costs for health care and the temporary disability not only for work, plantar fasciitis results in a substantial (and at least partially unnecessary) burden for the Swiss health care system and national economics.

Nonoperative treatment is the mainstay of treating plantar fasciitis. In the literature, numerous operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for plantar fasciitis have been suggested. However, so far no treatment has proven to be superior to others, and there is national and international lack of consensus of how to treat plantar fasciitis best. Numerous prescriptions for unnecessary orthoses, expensive and painful shock waves, and complications following steroid injection could be obviated, when the safe BTX-A injection demonstrates good results.

The investigators believe that the BTX-A injection in the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscles is currently the most promising non-operative approach, because it is considered to treat the disease at its origin (temporary weakening of the tight triceps surae muscle) as opposed to simply alleviate the symptoms (e.g. plantar cortisone and other injections, ESWT).

The high number of level I and II studies suggests that there is need for clarification and evaluation of the efficacy of several non-operative and operative treatment approaches for the chronic plantar fasciitis. However, to date there is no evidence in the literature that compares the new, promising technique of BTX-A injection into the gastroc-soleus complex to a sham (saline) injection and to the gold standard steroid injection at the plantar fascia insertion site. With the intended study, this gap is going to be closed. Objective evaluation of the BTX-A efficacy includes the randomized allocation of patients to the BTX-A, the steroid, or the saline group, the blinded comparison to the sham (saline) injection, and finally the MRI assessment at the beginning and at the end of the followup. With the evidence resulting from this study, patients can be superiorly counseled in the future with regard to efficacy of nonoperative treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Objective

Plantar fasciitis is the classic and most common type of heel pain. Considering the costs for health care and the temporary disability not only for work, plantar fasciitis results in a substantial (and at least partially unnecessary) burden for the Swiss health care system and national economics. However, so far no treatment has proven to be superior to others, and there is national and international lack of consensus of how to treat plantar fasciitis best.

Methods

Patients are randomly allocated to three groups (1 - 3).

\- Patient group 1 - combination of physiotherapy, stretching exercises according to DiGiovanni et al and BTX-A injection into the gastroc-soleus complex: One hundred units (U) of toxin are applied to each muscle belly, and 1 application of 50 U is administered to the soleus, making a total of 250 U.

* Patient group 2 - physiotherapy, stretching exercises according to DiGiovanni combined with cortisone injection into the plantar fascia
* Patient group 3 - physiotherapy, stretching exercises according to DiGiovanni and saline injection into the gastroc-soleus complex (sham control group)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plantar Fasciitis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

plantar fasciitis Botulinum toxin A Cortisone RCT

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BTX-A

Botulinum A toxin is injected each 100 U in both gastrocnemius muscle-bellies and 50 U in the soleus muscle, i.e. a total of 250 U.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Botulinum toxin A

Intervention Type DRUG

Researchers discovered in the 1950s that injecting overactive muscles with minute quantities of botulinum toxin type-A would result in decreased muscle activity. Botulinum toxin type-A has this effect because it prevents the vesicle where the acetylcholine is stored from binding to the membrane where the neurotransmitter can be released. Botulinum toxin type-A thus blocks the release of acetylcholine by the neuron. This will effectively weaken the muscle for a period of three to four months.

In addition to its cosmetic applications, Botox is currently used in the treatment of spasms and dystonias, by weakening involved muscles, for the 60-70 day effective period of the drug. The main conditions treated with botulinum toxin are: Cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) (a neuromuscular disorder involving the head and neck), Blepharospasm (excessive blinking) etc..

Cortisone

Depot Medrol is injected at the plantar fascia insertion site at the calcaneus

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Placebo saline is injected in both gastrocnemius muscle-bellies and in the soleus muscle

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Botulinum toxin A

Researchers discovered in the 1950s that injecting overactive muscles with minute quantities of botulinum toxin type-A would result in decreased muscle activity. Botulinum toxin type-A has this effect because it prevents the vesicle where the acetylcholine is stored from binding to the membrane where the neurotransmitter can be released. Botulinum toxin type-A thus blocks the release of acetylcholine by the neuron. This will effectively weaken the muscle for a period of three to four months.

In addition to its cosmetic applications, Botox is currently used in the treatment of spasms and dystonias, by weakening involved muscles, for the 60-70 day effective period of the drug. The main conditions treated with botulinum toxin are: Cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis) (a neuromuscular disorder involving the head and neck), Blepharospasm (excessive blinking) etc..

Intervention Type DRUG

cortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical symptoms of a plantar fasciitis
* Plantar fasciitis in MRI
* Exclusion of differential diagnoses
* Symptoms more than 3 months
* Absolution of 3 months unsuccessful treatment
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Active differential diagnoses
* Contraindications: pregnancy and breastfeeding, infection at injection sites, allergy against BTX-A
* Previous injections or surgery for plantar fasciitis
* Neurological diseases affecting the peripheral nervous system
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Luzerner Kantonsspital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fabian Krause, PD Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dep. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Freiburgstrasse, 3010 Berne, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dep, of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Lucerne

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fabian Krause, PD Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0041316322220

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fabian Krause, PD Dr.

Role: primary

Lukas Iselin, Dr.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brin MF, Lew MF, Adler CH, Comella CL, Factor SA, Jankovic J, O'Brien C, Murray JJ, Wallace JD, Willmer-Hulme A, Koller M. Safety and efficacy of NeuroBloc (botulinum toxin type B) in type A-resistant cervical dystonia. Neurology. 1999 Oct 22;53(7):1431-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.7.1431.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10534247 (View on PubMed)

Bihari K. Safety, effectiveness, and duration of effect of BOTOX after switching from Dysport for blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, and hemifacial spasm dystonia, and hemifacial spasm. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Mar;21(3):433-8. doi: 10.1185/030079905X36396.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15811212 (View on PubMed)

Elizondo-Rodriguez J, Araujo-Lopez Y, Moreno-Gonzalez JA, Cardenas-Estrada E, Mendoza-Lemus O, Acosta-Olivo C. A comparison of botulinum toxin a and intralesional steroids for the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double-blinded study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Jan;34(1):8-14. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460215.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23386757 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

32003B_152671

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id