Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
105 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-03
2016-11-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: In a free-standing Outpatient Surgery Center, the investigators conducted a randomized, double-masked, 3-arm, prospective comparison of IV midazolam only vs. midazolam with ketamine 5 mg IV vs. midazolam with ketamine 10 mg IV. The investigators then measured a single surgeon's assessment of surgical conditions, self-reported patient satisfaction, postoperative pain score, and duration of postoperative stay. The investigators also analyzed the dose of midazolam required to meet subjective anxiolysis in each group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Controlled Sedation for Cataract Surgery
NCT03401606
The Study of Different Sedative Medications in Monitored Anesthesia Care During Eye Surgery With Local Anesthesia
NCT04018703
Conscious Sedation Efficacy of the MKO Melt (Midazolam, Ketamine, Ondansetron)
NCT03653520
Dexmedetomidine vs. Propofol for Cataract Surgery
NCT00786370
Remifentanil and Remimazolam to Limit Patient Movement
NCT06583811
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sedation is commonly used during phacoemulsification to help alleviate patient anxiety and prevent the patient from interfering with the procedure. However, a great deal of variation exists in anesthetic management of these cases. Investigators have published use of a number of agents for sedation in the literature. These include midazolam, clonidine, propofol, fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, and oral diazepam. Intravenous (IV) clonidine has a half-life of 9-13 h and increased risk of postoperative hypotension. Propofol causes disinhibition and it has to be titrated during surgery to prevent oversedation. Opioids carry an increased risk of respiratory depression, prolonged sedation, as well as delirium in the elderly. Finally, oral medications do not allow for quick dose adjustments during surgery.
Intravenous midazolam is commonly used for sedation during phacoemulsification and other minor procedures. It has properties as an anxiolytic, muscle relaxant, and it is effective at reducing intraocular pressure. However, anxious patients administered benzodiazepines may require higher doses during cataract surgery which can lead to oversedation or disinhibition with subsequent patient movement. These responses can reduce the patient's ability to follow simple commands which can affect surgical outcome. Additionally, patients who receive too much sedation may fall asleep and wake up startled, similarly compromising the outcome of the surgery.
In the search for additional medications that can improve surgical conditions and patient comfort during phacoemulsification, the investigators explored the use of a medication that can improve analgesia and reduce patient movement during procedures, namely ketamine. Ketamine is an NMDA antagonist with both sedative and analgesic properties and has minimal effects on respiration. Ketamine has been used to premedicate and sedate patients undergoing day care procedures without adverse effects, and patients, typically, remain cooperative albeit being sedated. These properties along with its relatively short elimination half-life of 2 h (compared with 3-4 h for midazolam) make ketamine an attractive agent for sedation during monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for cataract surgery.
The purpose of this study was to determine if adding low-dose ketamine to midazolam has any beneficial (or negative) effects on operating conditions, patient satisfaction, and recovery during and after unilateral phacoemulsification procedures performed using topical anesthesia and IV conscious sedation.
The investigators measured the surgeon's assessment of the participant's cooperation during surgery according to a predetermined Likert scale. The investigators also recorded the following outcome measures regarding each participant's surgery: 1) total dose of midazolam, 2) average time spent in the procedural room, 3) postoperative length of stay (LOS), and 4) average postoperative pain score. The subjects received a survey inquiring about the subjects' comfort and sedation level during surgery. Finally, the investigators recorded the following demographic data for all participants: gender, age, psychiatric diagnoses, and use of CNS, psychiatric, or opioid medications.
Statistical Analysis The investigators used Fisher's exact test for examining data expressed as percentages, and Students t-test for yes/no data, and repeated measures ANOVA for 3 group analysis (LOS, surgical duration). The investigators judged significance at a P-value of 0.05. The investigators utilized a generalized estimated equations (GEE) to fit a logistic model to assess differences in the responses of patients based on amount of ketamine received. The GEE approach can fit models to correlated outcomes, as in the case where subjects had more than one procedure performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midazolam alone
Drug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + normal saline placebo. Midazolam + Normal saline
Midazolam + Normal saline
Preoperative control: Normal saline placebo given preoperatively. Then protocol followed for titration of midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Midazolam + Ketamine 5 mg
Drug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML. Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML
5 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 mg
Drug: Midazolam titrated 0.5-2.0 mg + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML. Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML
10 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 0.5 ML
5 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Midazolam + Ketamine 10 MG/ML: 1 ML
10 mg ketamine IV given just prior to onset of case. Then titrated midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Midazolam + Normal saline
Preoperative control: Normal saline placebo given preoperatively. Then protocol followed for titration of midazolam up to 2 mg IV at beginning and during case.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Timothy N Harwood, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00031444
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.