Dentists' Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results and Treatment Efficacy.

NCT ID: NCT03051295

Last Updated: 2017-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-08

Study Completion Date

2016-12-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is little evidence on how best to present diagnostic and treatment effect information to dentists and whether this makes any difference to their understanding of the information given and clinical management. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of different formats for presenting diagnostic test results and treatment efficacy on dentists' understanding and on their reported clinical management. The hypothesis is that presenting diagnostic test and treatment effectiveness results using natural frequencies influences the threshold for treatment and improves interpretation of tests results compared to conditional probabilities and percentage differences. A group of dentists recruited from postgraduate courses were randomized to two of four arms, being two arms of a hypothetical realistic diagnostic scenario (a) and two arms of a hypothetical realistic treatment scenario (b): a1) diagnostic test results presented in conditional probabilities; a2) diagnostic test results presented in natural frequencies; b1) treatment efficacy presented in percentages; b2) treatment efficacy presented in natural frequencies. The main outcome measures were the correct answer as to whether disease was actually present (post-test probability) and the correct answer as the number of patients that would benefit from the treatment (efficacy). Secondary outcome measures included the decision whether to treat or not treat the hypothetical patient.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diagnostic percentages.

Dentist receives diagnostic test results presented in conditional probabilities.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dental health information form

Intervention Type OTHER

The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Diagnostic frequencies

Dentist receives diagnostic test results presented in natural frequencies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dental health information form

Intervention Type OTHER

The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Treatment percentages.

Dentist receives treatment efficacy presented in percentages.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dental health information form

Intervention Type OTHER

The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Treatment frequencies.

Dentist receives treatment efficacy presented in natural frequencies.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dental health information form

Intervention Type OTHER

The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dental health information form

The format in which dentists receive information about diagnostic test results and efficacy of treatment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Graduated dentist undergoing a postgraduate course in a public university in Rio de Janeiro.

Exclusion Criteria

* None.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rio de Janeiro State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paulo Nadanovsky

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

riskcommunicationdentist2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.