Subconjunctiva Bupivacaine as Analgesia in Intravitreal Silicone Oil Removal

NCT ID: NCT03046719

Last Updated: 2017-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aimed to investigate the effectivity of bupivacaine 0,5% as post-operative analgesia in intravitreal silicone evacutaion surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups. Intravenous (IV) cannule with Ringer Lactate fluid, non-invasive blood pressure monitor, electrocardiogram (ECG) and pulse-oxymetry were set on the subjects in the operation room. Co-induction was done with midazolam 0,05 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 mcg/kg. Induction was done with propofol 1-2 mg/kg, followed by Laryngeal Mask insertion facilitated by atracurium 0,5 mg/kg. Maintenance was done with sevoflurane 1-2 vol%, O2:H2O = 1:2, flow 2 liter/minute. Surgery started. After final stitching, Group 1 received subconjunctival bupivacaine 0,5% 2,5ml in between stitches; Group 2 received subconjunctival NaCl 0,9% in between stitches. Both groups received paracetamol 20 mg/kgBW IV as post-operative analgesics. Hemodynamic, pain degree (using Visual Analog Scale / VAS), and nausea/vomiting incidence, and the time for first requested additional analgesia were recorded. Data was analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Scientist), for numerical data using unpaired T-test or Mann-Whitney-U test, for categorical data using Chi-square test or Fischer Exact's Test. Data normality was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Significant value is p\<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retinal Detachment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine 0,5%

Subjects received subconjunctival bupivacaine 0,5% 2,5ml in between stitches.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine 0,5%

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine 0,5% was given on the subconjunctiva, in between stitches by the surgeon after finishing the last stitches

NaCl 0,9%

Subjects received subconjunctival NaCl 0,9% in between stitches.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

NaCl 0,9%

Intervention Type DRUG

NaCl 0,9% was given on the subconjunctiva, in between stitches by the surgeon after finishing the last stitches

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine 0,5%

Bupivacaine 0,5% was given on the subconjunctiva, in between stitches by the surgeon after finishing the last stitches

Intervention Type DRUG

NaCl 0,9%

NaCl 0,9% was given on the subconjunctiva, in between stitches by the surgeon after finishing the last stitches

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects aged 18-60 years old, with ASA physical status I-II and BMI 18,5-30 kg/m2 who were planned to do intravitreal silicone evacuation surgery.
* Subjects have been explained about the study, have agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with history of post-operative chronic pain
* Subjects with history of pre-operative long term use of analgesic
* Subjects with history of local anesthetics allergy, pregnant subjects
* Subjects with ambulation operation
* Subjects with glaucoma or ocular hypertension
* Subjects with cognition dysfunction or communication disturbance
* Subjects with additional surgery other than silicone oil removal

Drop Out criteria:

* Subjects with intraoperative complications (e.g. shock, anaphylactic reaction, seizures, severe respiratory disturbance)
* Subjects with post-operative intraocular pressure \> 22mmHg.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indonesia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. dr. Aida Rosita Tantri SpAn-KA

Consultant, Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital

Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fekrat S, Elsing SH, Raja SC, Campochiaro PA, de Juan E Jr, Haller JA. Eye pain after vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective study of 185 patients. Retina. 2001;21(6):627-32. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200112000-00010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11756886 (View on PubMed)

Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):52-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet127.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23794645 (View on PubMed)

Wandner LD, Scipio CD, Hirsh AT, Torres CA, Robinson ME. The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. J Pain. 2012 Mar;13(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.014. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22225969 (View on PubMed)

Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro-Dasilva MC, Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL 3rd. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain. 2009 May;10(5):447-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19411059 (View on PubMed)

Belmonte C, Aracil A, Acosta MC, Luna C, Gallar J. Nerves and sensations from the eye surface. Ocul Surf. 2004 Oct;2(4):248-53. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70112-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17216099 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IndonesiaUAnes009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bupivacaine Epiphora Trial
NCT03266081 WITHDRAWN PHASE2