Patterns and Prevalence of FDG Extravasation in PET/CT Scans

NCT ID: NCT03041090

Last Updated: 2019-06-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

133 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PET (Positron Emission Tomography) images are used to help make patient management decisions in staging and treatment assessment, often after a cancer diagnosis.

Improper injections of PET tracers (dye) may occur approximately 15% of the time. This is known as extravasation or infiltration, and it compromises the doctor's ability to read the PET image. Often, the site where the tracer is injected into the vein (usually in the inside of the elbow) are not in the images taken, so reading physicians are unaware that an extravasation or infiltration has occurred.

Technology exists to capture time activity curves (amount of tracer in a location over a period of time) during the PET tracer uptake period (usually once the tracer is injected, the tracer circulates for 60 minutes prior to images), which can enable physicians to accurately detect extravasations and infiltration. This information is currently unavailable to physicians reading routine PET/CT (computed tomography) scans.

Time activity curves information gathered from these sensors during the circulation period appear to match the brief pictures taken approximately 70 minutes after the tracer injection.

This study will determine if these time activity curves correspond to PET images of the injection site taken during the tracer uptake period. If time activity curves correspond to PET images, they can be used to determine if the tracer was properly injected. If there was an improper injection, clinicians can be alerted to this fact and interpret the image with this additional information.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PET (Positron Emission Tomography) images are used to help make patient management decisions in staging and treatment assessment, often after a cancer diagnosis.

Improper injections of PET tracers (dye) may occur approximately 15% of the time. This is known as extravasation or infiltration, and it compromises the doctor's ability to read the PET image. Often, the site where the tracer is injected into the vein (usually in the inside of the elbow) are not in the images taken, so reading physicians are unaware that an extravasation or infiltration has occurred.

Technology exists to capture time activity curves (amount of tracer in a location over a period of time) during the PET tracer uptake period (usually once the tracer is injected, the tracer circulates for 60 minutes prior to images), which can enable physicians to accurately detect extravasations. This information is currently unavailable to physicians reading routine PET/CT scans.

Time activity curves information gathered from these sensors during the circulation period appear to match the brief pictures taken approximately 70 minutes after the tracer injection.

This study will determine if these time activity curves correspond to PET images of the injection site taken during the tracer uptake period. If time activity curves correspond to PET images, they can be used to determine if the tracer was properly injected. If there was an improper injection, clinicians can be alerted to this fact and interpret the image with this additional information.

In oncology, whole-body PET/CT is typically performed from the head to the pelvic floor (eyes to thighs). The use of the term whole-body is misleading because the most commonly used field of view (FOV) for arms-up whole-body PET/CT protocols includes only the base of skull to the upper thighs and does not include the brain, skull, and large portions of both upper and lower extremities. In such FOV, the most commonly used site of injection, namely the antecubital fossa (inside of the elbow), is frequently not included in the imaging field. In the Frontiers in Oncology article, Osman also determined that based on the commonly used FOV at most PET/CT centers, that when infiltration is present, it may be unnoticed by clinicians in approximately 31% of the cases.

Lucerno Dynamics, a privately held company in North Carolina, has also discovered that the static image may be incapable of reporting on the quality of FDG administration during the \~60 minute uptake period. Lucerno's system has been used in two investigational studies at two centers. At one center, the system was used with 8 patients for a total of 15 scans. At the other center, the system was used with 40 patients for a total of 85 scans. Similar rates of infiltrations were found to those described in the published articles. Based on this experience, Lucerno has found that infiltrations can partially resolve during the uptake period, so that even if they are visible in the PET image, the image may not reveal the extent of the infiltration. This could severely and negatively impact research and therapy decisions and thus patient outcomes.

The Lucerno devices (Lucerno ID) are nonsignificant risk devices that add only 2-3 minutes to the current standard of care PET/CT scanning process. Lucerno ID sensors are applied to the patient's skin before the injection of the radiotracer and are removed after the FDG uptake period and prior to the PET/CT imaging process. The Lucerno ID has the ability to identify infiltrations, whether they are within or outside the FOV of reviewing clinicians, and can alert clinicians before their patient undergoes a compromised PET/CT scan due to the infiltration. This technology can prevent patients from receiving the additional CT radiation exposure of a compromised scan, can save cost, and can improve patient outcomes by ensuring more accurate PET scan interpretation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intravenous Infiltration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All participants are included in the static imaging arm. Some participants were also included in the dynamic imaging arm
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Static Imaging participants

This arm of the study assessed participants' static PET/CT images. These were the standard of care images acquired after their standard of care uptake time. These images were assessed visually by a board certified physician and using the Time Activity Curves from the sensor data.

Intervention was Lucerno sensors (Lucerno Device Identity Document (LD ID), Lucerno Device 1 (LD1), Lucerno, Lara) placed on participant to monitor radiotracer activity at and around injection site.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lucerno ID (identification) System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Lucerno ID is intended to dynamically measure the uptake of radiotracer in a particular organ or body region during the radiotracer uptake period as part of nuclear medicine (NM) procedures. The Lucerno ID is indicated for use as a tool for trained healthcare professionals (technologists, NM physicians, and radiologists) to help assess whether a radiotracer injection has resulted in an infiltration. The LD ID can be used by healthcare professionals including nuclear medical technologists, nuclear medicine physicians, or any other medical staff in a NM facility, once they have received the necessary training into the use of the system.

Dynamic image participants

This arm of the study assessed participants' dynamic PET/CT images. These were the study related images of and around the injection site acquired during the participants' standard of care uptake time. These images were assessed visually by a board certified physician and using the Time Activity Curves from the sensor data.

Intervention was Lucerno sensors (LD ID, LD1, Lucerno, Lara) placed on participant to monitor radiotracer activity at and around injection site.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lucerno ID (identification) System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Lucerno ID is intended to dynamically measure the uptake of radiotracer in a particular organ or body region during the radiotracer uptake period as part of nuclear medicine (NM) procedures. The Lucerno ID is indicated for use as a tool for trained healthcare professionals (technologists, NM physicians, and radiologists) to help assess whether a radiotracer injection has resulted in an infiltration. The LD ID can be used by healthcare professionals including nuclear medical technologists, nuclear medicine physicians, or any other medical staff in a NM facility, once they have received the necessary training into the use of the system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lucerno ID (identification) System

The Lucerno ID is intended to dynamically measure the uptake of radiotracer in a particular organ or body region during the radiotracer uptake period as part of nuclear medicine (NM) procedures. The Lucerno ID is indicated for use as a tool for trained healthcare professionals (technologists, NM physicians, and radiologists) to help assess whether a radiotracer injection has resulted in an infiltration. The LD ID can be used by healthcare professionals including nuclear medical technologists, nuclear medicine physicians, or any other medical staff in a NM facility, once they have received the necessary training into the use of the system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LD ID (Lucerno Device identification), LD1 (Lucerno Device 1), Lucerno, Lara

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients ages 18-90.
* Scheduled for a standard of care PET/CT scan at Sisters of Saint Mary (SSM) Saint Louis University (SLU) Hospital
* Willing to have self-adhesive sensors placed on the injections site, contralateral arm in approximately the same position as the injection site, liver, and over the subclavical area.
* If consenting to imaging during the PET/CT uptake period, the patient must be able to rest comfortably on the PET/CT scanning table for approximately 60 minutes during the circulation of the tracer for additional PET only imaging.

Exclusion Criteria

* Persons (male or female) under age 18
* Persons with concerns about 4 adhesive sensors being placed on their bodies during the uptake period.
* Subjects unwilling to sign the consent document.
* Subjects who cannot consent for themselves
* Subjects who are not scheduled for a standard of care PET/CT exam at SLU hospital
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lucerno Dynamics Limited Liability Company (LLC)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Louis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Medhat M. Osman, MD., Sc.M., Ph.D.

Professor of Radiology; Director of Nuclear Medicine & PET/CT

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SSM Saint Louis University Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Muzaffar R, Frye SA, McMunn A, Ryan K, Lattanze R, Osman MM. Novel Method to Detect and Characterize 18F-FDG Infiltration at the Injection Site: A Single-Institution Experience. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Dec;45(4):267-271. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.198408. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29127247 (View on PubMed)

Schaefferkoetter JD, Osman M, Townsend DW. The Importance of Quality Control for Clinical PET Imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017 Dec;45(4):265-266. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.117.198465. Epub 2017 Oct 17. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29042469 (View on PubMed)

Lattanze RK, Osman MM, Ryan KA, Frye S, Townsend DW. Usefulness of Topically Applied Sensors to Assess the Quality of 18F-FDG Injections and Validation Against Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 1;5:303. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00303. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30443549 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29127247

Published article: Novel Method to Detect and Characterize 18Fluoride-FDG Infiltration at the Injection Site: A Single-Institution Experience

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042469

Published article: The Importance of Quality Control for Clinical PET Imaging

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SLU IRB # 26741

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

FDG-PET Imaging in Complicated Diabetic Foot
NCT00194298 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Radionecrosis and FDG PET
NCT02391246 UNKNOWN
Infiltration Effect on SUV
NCT03320564 TERMINATED NA
Single-tracer Multiparametric PET Imaging
NCT06014515 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Imaging Study for FdCyd and THU Cancer Treatment
NCT01479348 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1