Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-08-10
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Longitudinal Study for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
NCT00315380
Rituximab in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
NCT02807103
Identification of Autoantigens in EGPA and Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
NCT04671446
Association Corticosteroid/Azathioprine in Microscopic Polyangiitis/ Polyarteritis Nodosa or Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg Strauss Syndrome)
NCT00647166
The Epigenomic Signature of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis
NCT06231498
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following Churg and Strauss' original paper, the first attempt to provide diagnostic clarity was provided by John Lanham in 1984. Lanham listed symptoms seen in a set of patients with EGPA and suggested which symptoms were required for the disease and which symptoms were "additional". The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990 published a list of 6 symptoms to assist with classification of vasculitides, created by comparing 20 patients with EGPA with 787 patients with other forms of vasculitis. This was frequently used for diagnosis despite being intended for classification. In 1994, and revised in 2012, the International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference produced a nomenclature and definition for vasculitides, again frequently incorrectly used as diagnostic criteria. Finally, in 2014, diagnostic criteria were provided by the European Respiratory Society Churg Strauss Syndrome (ERS-CSS) taskforce; however published literature still uses a variety of criteria.
EGPA is recognised as a Th2 predominant disease with elevated levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IgE according to a number of case control studies and case reports. Association between IL-10 levels and ANCA negative EGPA has been reported. Th17 responses also seem to be elevated with raised serum IL-25 reported, potentiating Th2 cytokine release. Eosinophil products are detectable in serum, BAL, urine and biopsies with varying time-courses. Roles of other cells such as regulatory T cells, memory T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, ILCs and others are being investigated.
Previous work within the investigators' unit has demonstrated disturbances in the coagulation system in patients with asthma. The investigators have demonstrated that, while moderate asthma appears to favour fibrinolysis, severe asthma is a fibrinogenic condition. Deposition of fibrin within the airways in fatal asthma has been previously recognised, but a case study demonstrated strong activation of the coagulation system five days prior to an exacerbation. Another case study has demonstrated increased activation of the coagulation system in a patient with active EGPA which normalised on remission, but more in depth work has not been done.
It has been previously recognised that ANCA positive patients often have a different disease phenotype to those who are ANCA negative, suffering with more vasculitic symptoms and renal disease but less cardiac involvement. In 2014 the ERS-CSS taskforce provided diagnostic criteria for these two main phenotypes - separating the vasculitic phenotype which remains called Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA), from the ANCA negative tissular phenotype called Hypereosinophilic Asthma with Systemic Manifestations (HASM). It is currently unclear if this distinction matches biological endotypes, or whether different treatment strategies are advisable between the two groups. It is possible that HASM is a precursor state to full vasculitic EGPA, however the increased incidence of cardiac manifestations within this group would point away from this, as would the differing prevalence of genetic markers such as IL-10 promoter activation.
Prior to the advent of corticosteroid use, prognosis of EGPA was poor with a mortality rate of 50% at 3 months. Treatment primarily consists of immunosuppression with corticosteroids, with induction therapy using cyclophosphamide in severe cases. Rituximab is approved for use in GPA and MPA, while case reports demonstrate a good effect in patients with severe, refractory EGPA, uncontrolled on other therapy. Those who suffer from CSS can be exposed to prolonged steroid therapy with the majority of patients experiencing side effects of their medication such as weight gain, osteopaenia, impaired glucose tolerance, cataracts and skin atrophy. Steroid sparing agents such as azathioprine and mycophenolate are used with variable effect. Treatment is primarily guided by eosinophil count and symptom scores such as the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) as there are not currently any diagnostic tests or EGPA-specific biomarkers. Presence of a specific biomarker would allow more accurate alterations in patients' mediation, as non-specific symptoms can imitate EGPA and prompt increases in steroid doses.
Research questions Do the ERS-CSS diagnostic criteria divide the PHT cohort into groups with distinct clinical characteristics? How do the EGPA and HASM groups differ in clinical and physiological characteristics and how do these change over time?
Potential impact If the investigators confirm that EGPA and HASM represent distinct clinical entities within our cohort, further research into biological mechanisms and treatment options is needed, and this work will help to guide further studies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cared for currently or previously cared for at Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
* Diagnosed with EGPA/HASM according to clinicians
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anoop J Chauhan, PhD FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHT/2015/130
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.