Comparison of Sleep Apnea Assessment Strategies to Maximize TBI Rehabilitation Participation and Outcome

NCT ID: NCT03033901

Last Updated: 2023-03-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

345 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2020-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Sleep disorders, including sleep apnea, are common after traumatic brain injury and affect recovery and negatively influence participation in rehabilitation. Sleep apnea is a breathing problem while persons sleep and causes further brain damage and problems with thinking, daily functioning, and overall health. Earlier diagnosis and treatment is important for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors to maximize the recovery process. There is little information that guides TBI doctors on how to identify sleep apnea during inpatient TBI rehabilitation, a phase in which people experience the potential for a rapid pace of improvement. The Agency for Healthcare Research has highlighted gaps in best methods for identifying sleep apnea and separately in helping consumers with TBI rehabilitation choices. Partnering with survivors, caregivers, and administrators, investigators developed this study to compare sleep apnea screening and diagnostic tools in TBI rehabilitation settings. This information will provide clinicians, providers, and patients with the best information for early identification of sleep apnea to remove negative influence on the pace of recovery in early phases after TBI.

The Goal: Investigators will compare existing screening (Aim 1) and diagnostic tools (Aim 2) in TBI patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. For the second aim, investigators will determine if a more accessible diagnostic test is sufficient to diagnose sleep apnea compared to the traditional method used which is less accessible to consumers. If the more accessible test is good enough, this will increase recognition of this problem and increase patient access to earlier sleep apnea treatment.

Stakeholders and Products. TBI survivors, caregivers, researchers, and policymakers working together on this study helped develop the study questions. Idea exchanges included ways to reach clinicians and TBI survivors/caregivers via existing educational programming and online tools for consumers such as fact sheets and patient/caregiver-focused videos. Other traditional methods will include targeting professional magazines, conferences, and research journals that reach professionals working with TBI survivors and their families at the time of admission to rehabilitation and during the recovery process. This study will occur at rehabilitation hospitals around the country who enroll TBI survivors into a lifetime study called the TBI Model System funded by the Department of Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs (VA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and Significance:

Meta-analyses of TBI studies found prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was 12 times higher than community-based studies. Yet, sleep apnea in those with TBI is largely undiagnosed. Given that sleep is critical for neural repair and disordered sleep may play a role in slowing functional recovery and prolonging rehabilitation, early detection of sleep apnea is critical (Stakeholder Input). Minimal guidance exists informing TBI and sleep medicine physicians regarding assessment of sleep disorders in the acute rehabilitation setting. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Comparative Effectiveness Review highlighted insufficient comparative effectiveness evidence for diagnostic and screening tools. This study proposes to leverage the existing TBI Model System research consortium (TBIMS), funded by the Departments of Health and Human Services and Veterans Affairs, to improve early detection of sleep apnea in patients with TBI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation at six study sites. Study aims are focused around components of phased testing for sleep apnea. Findings will inform clinician's decisions for screening and diagnostic tests to facilitate earlier recognition of sleep apnea (outcome) and subsequently prescribe appropriate treatments.

Study Aims:

Aim I: (Screening) For individuals with TBI, determine comparative effectiveness of 2 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) endorsed screening tools (STOPBang Questionnaire \[STOPBang\] vs. Actigraphy \[ACG\]) to identify those at high risk of sleep apnea as diagnosed through Level 1 polysomnography (PSG). Long-term Objectives: To inform clinician's choices for screening measures to determine presence of sleep apnea.

Exploratory Aim:

Evaluate alternative screening tools (Berlin Questionnaire, Multivariate Apnea Prediction Index \[MAPI\]) to Level 1 PSG in Aim 1.

Aim II: (Diagnosis) This study will determine the diagnostic accuracy (non-inferiority) of Level 3 PSG in determining presence of sleep apnea in patients with acute TBI patients in the rehabilitation setting. Level 1 PSG will be used as the criterion standard. Long-term Objectives: To inform clinician's choices of diagnostic tests to determine presence of sleep apnea and prescribe appropriate treatments. If Level 3 portable PSG is equivalent to the less accessible Level 1 PSG, this will increase consumer accessibility.

Study Design:

This is a 3-year, multi-center prospective observational cohort study.

Intervention and Comparators:

In Aim I, the screening tools STOPBang and ACG will be compared against one another to determine their sensitivity and specificity in identifying patients with TBI at risk for sleep apnea. In Aim II, the non-inferiority of Level 3 PSG in determining presence and severity of sleep apnea in patients with moderate to severe TBI will be compared to Level 1 PSG.

Study Population:

Consecutive participants to neurorehabilitation at an existing National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) or VA funded TBIMS Center will make up the study population. Patients will be age 16 and older (18 or older at VA sites), with moderate to severe TBI, admitted for rehabilitation in a U.S. TBIMS inpatient rehabilitation facility, and sleeping \> 2 hours/night suggesting habitual sleep duration. Based on historical data from the six study sites participating in this study, investigators in this study conservatively estimated that 70% of patients admitted for inpatient TBI rehabilitation would consent into this study (N=20/month), resulting in a 13-month enrollment estimate of 259 patients. Power analyses of each study aim suggest that a sample size of 237 is the largest sample size needed for sufficient power. The sites participating in this study aim to collectively enroll 259 patients to account for possible further attrition. Based on TBIMS data acquired over the past 25-years, 44% of the sample is female, 64% are categorized as Non-White, median age is 38 years, with predominantly moderate to severe TBI.

Primary outcomes consist of:

1\) Positive predictive power of screening tools: STOPBang and ACG, 2) Equivalency in detection of sleep apnea via Level 1 and Level 3 PSG, with diagnosis of sleep apnea based on overall apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) \> 5.

Analytic Methods:

Aim 1: Investigators expect that STOPBang values \> 5 and abnormal ACG total sleep time (\< 5 hours with desaturation) will produce sufficiently high SEs with reasonable tradeoff in SP (noting that SE and SP are inversely related). Similarly, for Level 1 PSG, a diagnosis of sleep apnea will be made if AHI ≥ 5. Cross-tabulations of STOPBang and ACG screening for high risk of sleep apnea (positive/negative) versus Level 1 PSG diagnosis (positive/negative) will be constructed and estimates of diagnostic accuracy (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals. To address hypothesis 1.1, two-sided McNemar's tests will be used to compare the paired SEs and paired SPs between STOPBang and ACG assuming a significance level of α = 0.05.

Aim 2: The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of Level 3 PSG (compared to Level 1 PSG, the reference gold standard) will each be estimated and compared to fixed hypothesized rates of SE and SP of 90% and 60%, respectively, considered sufficiently large enough. Level 1 PSG (reference) diagnosis of sleep apnea will be made based on AHI ≥ 5. Level 3 PSG (test) diagnosis will be made based AHI ≥ 5. A cross-tabulation of Level 3 PSG (positive/negative) versus Level 1 PSG (positive/negative) will be constructed and standard measures of diagnostic accuracy will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy).To test for non-inferiority of the SE to 90% and the SP to 60%, a non-inferiority threshold of 0.1 is assumed. If the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval for SE is strictly above 80% and the lower bound on the confidence interval for SP is strictly above 50% then non-inferiority of Level 3 PSG (compared to Level 3 PSG) can be established.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apnea, Sleep Brain Injury, Traumatic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Polysomnography - Level 1 and Level 3

Participants will undergo simultaneous administration of Level 1 and 3 polysomnography on the rehabilitation unit with study funded sleep technologist present to meet Level 1 standards.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Actigraphy monitoring

Participants will undergo actigraphy monitoring to assess habitual sleep duration to determine readiness for polysomnography and examine trajectory and duration of sleep.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sleep Apnea Screening

Participants and their family member or proxy, and clinical staff will be asked to answer questions in order to complete the three standardized sleep apnea screening measures.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Philips Respironics Alice 6 Lab Diagnostic System Nox T3 Philips Respironics Airway (AW) Spectrum Plus Actiwatch Berlin Questionnaire STOPBang Questionnaire Multivariate Apnea Prediction Index

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Meet case definition for TBI:

(A). VA (for James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital): i. Persons fitting the definition of traumatic brain injury (TBI), defined as a traumatically induced structural brain injury, brain trauma, or damage to brain tissue, and/or physiological disruption of brain function as a result of an external mechanical force (also including acceleration/deceleration movement without direct external trauma to the head, a foreign body penetrating the brain, forces generated from events such as a blast or explosion, or other force) as evidenced by self-reported or medically documented (physical examination or mental status examination) new onset or worsening of at least one of the following clinical signs immediately following the event: (a) a period of loss of or a decreased level of consciousness; (b) alteration in mental state at the time of the injury (confusion, disorientation, slowed thinking); (c) loss of memory for events immediately before or after the injury; (d) posttraumatic amnesia (PTA); (d)neurological deficits (weakness, imbalance, change in vision, praxis, paresis/plegia, sensory loss, aphasia, etc.) that may or may not be transient; or (e) intracranial lesion. ii. Age 18 or older at the time of index TBI. iii. Admitted to one of the five designated VA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers (PRCs) for comprehensive rehabilitation with the presenting diagnoses of TBI. Comprehensive rehabilitation must occur in the PRC and meet the following criteria: (a) Medical and rehabilitation care are supervised on a regular basis by a physician affiliated with the PRC; (b) 24-hour nursing care is provided to the patient; (c) Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), Speech, Rehabilitation Psychology, Neuropsychology, and/or family support/education are provided in an integrated team approach with the expectation of further gain; (d) Operates in a manner consistent with Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) standards for brain injury inpatient rehabilitation and/or Medicare requirements for inpatient rehabilitation.

OR

(B). Civilian (for civilian sites): Damage to brain tissue caused by an external mechanical force, alteration of consciousness \> 24 hours, or loss of consciousness \>30 minutes, or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score in the Emergency Department of3-12, or intracranial abnormalities on imaging regardless of GCS;

AND
2. admission to an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation program;
3. minimum age 16 years at civilian sites and 18 years at the VA site;
4. Understands and provides informed consent to participate (or, if unable, healthcare proxy / legal guardian understands and provides informed consent for the patient);
5. sleep duration \> 2 hours/night.

Exclusion Criteria

1. persons less than 16 years old at civilian sites and less than 18 years old at VA site will not be included;
2. pre-injury diagnosis of narcolepsy or persistent daytime somnolence as documented in patient's medical record and/or family report; and/or
3. tracheostomy placed and decannulation or overnight capping of the tracheostomy not feasible during rehabilitation hospitalization.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Craig Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of South Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Florida Foundation for Research and Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Risa Richardson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Craig Hospital

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network/Moss Rehabilitation Hospital

Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Holcomb EM, Schwartz DJ, McCarthy M, Thomas B, Barnett SD, Nakase-Richardson R. Incidence, Characterization, and Predictors of Sleep Apnea in Consecutive Brain Injury Rehabilitation Admissions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):82-100. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000230.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26959663 (View on PubMed)

Kamper JE, Garofano J, Schwartz DJ, Silva MA, Zeitzer J, Modarres M, Barnett SD, Nakase-Richardson R. Concordance of Actigraphy With Polysomnography in Traumatic Brain Injury Neurorehabilitation Admissions. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000215.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26959665 (View on PubMed)

Towns SJ, Zeitzer J, Kamper J, Holcomb E, Silva MA, Schwartz DJ, Nakase-Richardson R. Implementation of Actigraphy in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Neurorehabilitation Admissions: A Veterans Administration TBI Model Systems Feasibility Study. PM R. 2016 Nov;8(11):1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27178377 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R. Improving the Significance and Direction of Sleep Management in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):79-81. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000235. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26959662 (View on PubMed)

Holcomb EM, Towns S, Kamper JE, Barnett SD, Sherer M, Evans C, Nakase-Richardson R. The Relationship Between Sleep-Wake Cycle Disturbance and Trajectory of Cognitive Recovery During Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):108-16. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000206.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26709584 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R, Sherer M, Barnett SD, Yablon SA, Evans CC, Kretzmer T, Schwartz DJ, Modarres M. Prospective evaluation of the nature, course, and impact of acute sleep abnormality after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;94(5):875-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23296143 (View on PubMed)

Silva MA, Nakase-Richardson R, Sherer M, Barnett SD, Evans CC, Yablon SA. Posttraumatic confusion predicts patient cooperation during traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;91(10):890-3. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825a1648.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22660372 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Thompson R, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Nick TG, Trzepacz PT. Acute confusion following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004 Feb;18(2):131-42. doi: 10.1080/0269905031000149542.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14660226 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R, Dahdah MN, Almeida E, Ricketti P, Silva MA, Calero K, Magalang U, Schwartz DJ. Concordance between current American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Centers for Medicare and Medicare scoring criteria for obstructive sleep apnea in hospitalized persons with traumatic brain injury: a VA TBI Model System study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020 Jun 15;16(6):879-888. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8352.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32043962 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R, Schwartz DJ, Ketchum JM, Drasher-Phillips L, Dahdah MN, Monden KR, Bell K, Hoffman J, Whyte J, Bogner J, Calero K, Magalang U. Comparison of Diagnostic Sleep Studies in Hospitalized Neurorehabilitation Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1689-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.083. Epub 2020 May 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32387522 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R, Hoffman JM, Magalang U, Almeida E, Schwartz DJ, Drasher-Phillips L, Ketchum JM, Whyte J, Bogner J, Dismuke-Greer CE. Cost-Benefit Analysis From the Payor's Perspective for Screening and Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Moderate to Severe TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1497-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32376325 (View on PubMed)

Zeitzer JM, Hon F, Whyte J, Monden KR, Bogner J, Dahdah M, Wittine L, Bell KR, Nakase-Richardson R. Coherence Between Sleep Detection by Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Multi-Center, Inpatient Cohort of Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2020 Dec;12(12):1205-1213. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12353. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32125095 (View on PubMed)

Martin AM, Pinto SM, Tang X, Hoffman JM, Wittine L, Walker WC, Schwartz DJ, Kane G, Takagishi SC, Nakase-Richardson R. Associations between early sleep-disordered breathing following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and long-term chronic pain status: a Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Jan 1;19(1):135-143. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10278.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36591795 (View on PubMed)

Steward KA, Silva MA, Maduri P, Tang X, Wittine L, Dams-O'Connor K, Nakase-Richardson R. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with worse cognitive outcomes in acute moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A TBI Model Systems study. Sleep Med. 2022 Dec;100:454-461. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36252414 (View on PubMed)

Martin AM, Almeida EJ, Starosta AJ, Hammond FM, Hoffman JM, Schwartz DJ, Fann JR, Bell KR, Nakase-Richardson R. The Impact of Opioid Medications on Sleep Architecture and Nocturnal Respiration During Acute Recovery From Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A TBI Model Systems Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021 Sep-Oct 01;36(5):374-387. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000727.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34489388 (View on PubMed)

Nakase-Richardson R, Schwartz DJ, Drasher-Phillips L, Ketchum JM, Calero K, Dahdah MN, Monden KR, Bell K, Magalang U, Hoffman JM, Whyte J, Bogner J, Zeitzer JM. Comparative Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Screening Instruments During Inpatient Rehabilitation Following Moderate to Severe TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb;101(2):283-296. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31705855 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.tbindsc.org/

NIDILRR-funded TBI Model System website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CER-1511-33005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CPAP Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06773416 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Addressing Sleep Apnea Post-Stroke/TIA
NCT04322162 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Sleep for Stroke Management and Recovery Trial
NCT03812653 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
MCI: CPAP Treatment of OSA (Memories2)
NCT03113461 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA