Haloperidol With or Without Chlorpromazine in Treating Delirium in Patients With Advanced, Metastatic, or Recurrent Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03021486

Last Updated: 2025-09-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-05

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well haloperidol with or without chlorpromazine works in treating delirium in patients with cancer that has spread to other parts of the body or has come back. Haloperidol and chlorpromazine may control the symptoms of delirium (loss of contact with reality) in patients with cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Assess the within-arm effect of haloperidol dose escalation, rotation to chlorpromazine, and combination therapy on agitation intensity (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale \[RASS\]) over 24 hours in patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) who did not experience a response to low-dose haloperidol.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Obtain preliminary estimates of the effects of haloperidol dose escalation, rotation to chlorpromazine, and combination therapy on (1) the proportion of patients with target RASS -2 to 0, (2) delirium-related distress in nurses and caregivers (delirium experience questionnaire), (3) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (4) delirium severity (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale), (5) the need for neuroleptics, (6) delirium recall (Delirium Recall Questionnaire), (7) adverse effects and (8) quality of end-of-life (Quality of Death and Dying questionnaire) over time.

II. Obtain preliminary estimates of the between-arm effect size among haloperidol dose escalation, rotation to chlorpromazine, and combination therapy in the first 24 hours.

III. To assess caregiver and nurse preferences regarding proxy sedation goals. IV. To examine the feasibility of novel measures for the assessment of agitation with continuous video monitoring.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive haloperidol intravenously (IV) over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

GROUP II: Patients receive chlorpromazine IV over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

GROUP III: Patients receive haloperidol and chlorpromazine IV over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advanced Malignant Neoplasm Delirium Locally Advanced Malignant Neoplasm Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm Recurrent Malignant Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I (haloperidol)

Patients receive haloperidol IV over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Haloperidol

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Group II (chlorpromazine)

Patients receive chlorpromazine IV over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorpromazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Group III (haloperidol, chlorpromazine)

Patients receive haloperidol and chlorpromazine IV over 3-15 minutes every 4 hours in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chlorpromazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Haloperidol

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chlorpromazine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Haloperidol

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chlor-PZ Thorazine Haldol McN-JR-1625 R 1625 R-1625 Quality of Life Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. \[Patients\] Diagnosis of advanced cancer (defined as locally advanced, metastatic recurrent, or incurable disease)
2. \[Patients\] Admitted to the acute palliative care unit
3. \[Patients\] Delirium as per DSM-V criteria (The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5))
4. \[Patients\] Hyperactive or mixed delirium with RASS \>/=1 in the past 24 h (RASS\>/=+1 indicates any degree of restlessness. In the electronic medical record nursing note, this behavior would be indicated by any documentation of "restless", "agitated", "hyperactive", "pulling on devices/IV" or similar wording).
5. \[Patients\] On scheduled haloperidol for delirium (\</=8 mg in the past 24 h) or rescue haloperidol of \>/=4 mg for restlessness/agitation in the past 24 h
6. \[Patients\] Age 18 years or older
7. \[Family Caregivers\] Patient's spouse, adult child, sibling, parent, other relative, or significant other (defined by the patient as a partner)
8. \[Family Caregivers\] Age 18 years or older

Exclusion:

1. \[Patients\] History of myasthenia gravis or acute narrow angle glaucoma
2. \[Patients\] History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or active seizure disorder (with seizure episode within the past week)
3. \[Patients\] History of Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's dementia
4. \[Patients\] History of prolonged QTc interval (\>500 ms) if documented by ECG within the past month
5. \[Patients\] History of hypersensitivity to haloperidol or chlorpromazine
6. \[Patients\] On scheduled chlorpromazine within the past 48 h
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Hui

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hui D, De La Rosa A, Wilson A, Nguyen T, Wu J, Delgado-Guay M, Azhar A, Arthur J, Epner D, Haider A, De La Cruz M, Heung Y, Tanco K, Dalal S, Reddy A, Williams J, Amin S, Armstrong TS, Breitbart W, Bruera E. Neuroleptic strategies for terminal agitation in patients with cancer and delirium at an acute palliative care unit: a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):989-998. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30307-7. Epub 2020 May 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32479786 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdanderson.org

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2017-01065

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2016-0687

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

R21NR016736

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2016-0687

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Chemo Brain Prehab Project
NCT07341217 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Cannabis For Cancer-Related Symptoms
NCT03948074 COMPLETED PHASE2