Treatment Algorithm for Nausea and Vomiting in the Palliative Phase

NCT ID: NCT03017391

Last Updated: 2017-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nausea and vomiting are frequently occurring problems in the palliative phase of patients with cancer. Between 20-50% of them regularly suffer from nausea, retching or vomiting. Often the cause of nausea and vomiting is multifactorial and symptomatic treatment is necessary.

Potential drugs for symptomatic anti-nausea therapy are metoclopramide, serotonin antagonists, the combination of both and dexamethasone as rescue medication in case of failure. There is no data that depicts which strategy is the best. This study will be conducted to unravel which treatment algorithm is most successful.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nausea and vomiting are frequently occurring problems in the palliative phase of patients with cancer. Between 20-50% of them regularly suffer from nausea, retching or vomiting. Often the cause of nausea and vomiting is multifactorial and symptomatic treatment is necessary.

Potential drugs for symptomatic anti-nausea therapy are metoclopramide, serotonin antagonists, the combination of both and dexamethasone as rescue medication in case of failure. There is no data that depicts which strategy is the best. This study will be conducted to unravel which treatment algorithm is most successful: 1 to start with metoclopramide, to add a serotonin antagonist (granisetron transdermal patch and 2 milligram granisetron oral loading dose if the patient can swallow) in case of failure and to add dexamethasone as rescue medication versus 2 an algorithm to start with a serotonin antagonist (granisetron transdermal patch and 2 milligram granisetron oral loading dose if the patient can swallow), to add metoclopramide in case of failure and to add dexamethasone as rescue medication. Granisetron plaster is a new formulation of a well known serotonin antagonist and might be useful especially within the patient group in the palliative phase.

The questions are:

Is it feasible to compare treatment algorithms for symptomatic treatment of nausea and vomiting in palliative cancer patients? And is a stepwise symptomatic treatment algorithm to manage nausea and vomiting using metoclopramide or granisetron transdermal patch as a start medication effective in palliative patients in at least one of both treatment arms? Patients will be asked to complete the QLQC30 and ESAS on different moments during the study. Besides, they will be asked to complete a diary for nausea severity (NRS scale 0-10) and for the frequency of vomiting and retching twice daily.

Success of a treatment algorithm is defined as nausea is \< 3 on NRS or a decrease of \>2 on NRS for nausea combined with an absence of vomiting or retching in the last 3 days. Incomplete success is defined as nausea of 3 on NRS during one occasion of the last 3 days before the end of study but less than 4, no more than one retching a day during that period and absence of vomiting. Complete failure is defined as nausea of 4 or more on an NRS during the last 3 days or more than one retching daily or any vomiting or in case the patient has stopped all medication due to side effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nausea Vomiting Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

algorithm 1 first metoclopramide

metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally and in those patients that cannot swallow tablets the medication will be substituted by suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally. In case of failure, granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours will be added to the treatment and a loading dose of 2 mg granisetron oral if the patient can swallow. In case of toxicity metoclopramide will be stopped. In case of failure of the combination (second step) or toxicity, an oral dose of dexamethasone 8 mg will be added daily.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

metoclopramide

Intervention Type DRUG

metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally or suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally, use until toxicity

granisetron

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours, use until toxicity

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone 8 mg, last step in both algorithms

Granisetron 2Mg Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron 2 mg loading dose

algorithm 2 first granisetron

granisetron patch 3.1 mg/24 hours will be offered to the patient, and a loading dose of 2 mg granisetron oral if the patient can swallow In case of failure, metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally will be added and in those patients that cannot swallow tablets the oral medication will be substituted with rectal suppositories 10 mg. The granisetron patch will only be withdrawn from patients that suffer from clinically relevant toxicity. Metoclopramide will then be administered.

In the case of secondary failure or toxicity, dexamethasone 8 mg orally daily will be added.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

metoclopramide

Intervention Type DRUG

metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally or suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally, use until toxicity

granisetron

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours, use until toxicity

Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone 8 mg, last step in both algorithms

Granisetron 2Mg Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron 2 mg loading dose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

metoclopramide

metoclopramide 10 mg tablets 3x daily orally or suppositories 10 mg 3x daily rectally, use until toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron

granisetron patch 3.1mg/24 hours, use until toxicity

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone

dexamethasone 8 mg, last step in both algorithms

Intervention Type DRUG

Granisetron 2Mg Tablet

granisetron 2 mg loading dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sancuso

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients 18 years or older in the palliative phase and
* who suffer from nausea or vomiting with a rating on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of more than 2 and
* have a wish to be treated and
* where no treatable cause is assignable

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients not able to sign informed consent.
* Patients with known contra-indications for metoclopramide, 5HT-3 antagonists or dexamethasone.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

C.A.H.H.V.M. Verhagen, M.D. Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Christa v Schaik

Role: CONTACT

024-3610353

C.A.H.H.V.M. Verhagen, M.D. Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

024-3610353

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CVS01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.