Prevention of Delayed Nausea A Phase III Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT00475085

Last Updated: 2015-11-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1021 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs, such as granisetron, dexamethasone, prochlorperazine, aprepitant, and palonosetron, may help lessen or prevent nausea. It is not yet known which combination of antiemetic drugs is more effective in preventing nausea caused by chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing different combinations of granisetron, dexamethasone, prochlorperazine, aprepitant, and palonosetron to see how well they work in preventing nausea in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* Compare the efficacy of palonosetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone followed by prochlorperazine with vs without dexamethasone in preventing delayed nausea in women with chemotherapy-naive breast cancer. (Arms I and IV)
* Determine if palonosetron hydrochloride is more effective than granisetron hydrochloride in controlling treatment-related delayed nausea in these patients. (Arms I and II)
* Determine if the currently recommended antiemetic guideline of aprepitant combined with palonosetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone is the most effective antiemetic regimen for controlling treatment-related delayed nausea in these patients. (Arms III and IV)

Secondary

* Determine if the addition of dexamethasone to prochlorperazine is more effective than the same regimen without dexamethasone for reducing interference with functioning caused by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in these patients. (Arms I and IV)
* Determine if palonosetron hydrochloride is more effective than granisetron hydrochloride for reducing interference with functioning caused by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in these patients. (Arms I and II)
* Determine if the currently recommended antiemetic guideline of aprepitant combined with palonosetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone is the most effective antiemetic regimen for reducing interference with functioning due to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in these patients. (Arms III and IV)

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to CCOP center and gender. Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms. Patients receive study treatment approximately 30 minutes before their scheduled first chemotherapy treatment.

* Arm I: Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and another oral placebo once daily on days 2 and 3.
* Arm II: Patients receive granisetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and another oral placebo once daily on days 2 and 3.
* Arm III: Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV and dexamethasone IV once on day 1, oral aprepitant once daily on days 1-3, and oral dexamethasone once daily and oral placebo twice daily on days 2 and 3.
* Arm IV: Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and oral dexamethasone once daily on days 2 and 3.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and on day 4. Nausea and vomiting, fatigue, sleep quality, exercise, and the need for rescue medication (metoclopramide) are assessed on days 1-4.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 890 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nausea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I

Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and another oral placebo once daily on days 2 and 3.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

palonosetron hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

prochlorperazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally

Arm II

Patients receive granisetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and another oral placebo once daily on days 2 and 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

granisetron hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

prochlorperazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally

Arm III

Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV and dexamethasone IV once on day 1, oral aprepitant once daily on days 1-3, and oral dexamethasone once daily and oral placebo twice daily on days 2 and 3.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

aprepitant

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

palonosetron hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally

Arm IV

Patients receive palonosetron hydrochloride IV, dexamethasone IV, and oral placebo once on day 1 and oral prochlorperazine 3 times daily and oral dexamethasone once daily on days 2 and 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

palonosetron hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

prochlorperazine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally or IV

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Given orally

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

aprepitant

Given orally or IV

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone

Given orally or IV

Intervention Type DRUG

granisetron hydrochloride

Given orally or IV

Intervention Type DRUG

palonosetron hydrochloride

Given orally or IV

Intervention Type DRUG

prochlorperazine

Given orally or IV

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Given orally

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Emend Decadron Kytril Aloxi Compazine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a diagnosis of cancer and be chemotherapy naive.
* Must be scheduled to receive a chemotherapy treatment containing doxorubicin hydrochloride, epirubicin hydrochloride, cisplatin, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin (any dose or schedule) without concurrent radiotherapy or interferon treatment
* Chemotherapy may be for adjuvant, neoadjuvant, curative or palliative intent.
* Dose-dense regimens (e.g. chemotherapy with doxorubicin or epirubicin given every two weeks)are allowed.
* For the purposes of this study, Day 1 of chemotherapy will be defined as the day of administration of cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, doxorubicin or epirubicin.
* Regimens with multiple-day doses of doxorubicin, epirubicin, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, dacarbazine, hexamethylmelamine, nitrosoureas, or streptozocin are not allowed. Chemotherapy agents, other than those listed above, may be given orally, intravenously, or by continuous infusion on one or multiple days.
* Able to understand English

Exclusion Criteria

* No symptomatic brain metastases
* No concurrent or impending bowel obstruction
* Regimens containing liposomal doxorubicin or cisplatin are not allowed.
* No concurrent pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, or cisapride
* No concurrent doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome or cisplatin
* No concurrent multiple-day doses of dacarbazine, altretamine, nitrosoureas, streptozocin, cisplatin, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Joseph Roscoe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joseph Roscoe

Research Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph A. Roscoe, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

James P. Wilmot Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MBCCOP - Gulf Coast

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Central Illinois

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kalamazoo

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Metro-Minnesota

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Nevada Cancer Research Foundation

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

CCOP - North Shore University Hospital

Manhassett, New York, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbus

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Dayton

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Greenville

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Northwest

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Roscoe JA, Heckler CE, Morrow GR, Mohile SG, Dakhil SR, Wade JL, Kuebler JP. Prevention of delayed nausea: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program study of patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 20;30(27):3389-95. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8123. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22915657 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U10CA037420

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

URCC-U1105

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000544841

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.