Comparison of Clinical Effects of Azathioprine and Rituximab NMO-SD Patients
NCT ID: NCT03002038
Last Updated: 2020-09-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Monitoring of Azathioprine Metabolite Concentrations and Cytokine Levels in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
NCT05896605
Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Branebrutinib Treatment in Participants With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Primary Sjögren's Syndrome, or Branebrutinib Treatment Followed by Open-label Abatacept Treatment in Study Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT04186871
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis
NCT00282347
Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders
NCT05909943
IMPROVE: Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine for Maintenance Therapy in ANCA Associated Systemic Vasculitis
NCT00307645
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Considering that the disease can be disabling for patients, the maintenance treatment should be applied in addition to treatment of acute attacks, in order to prevent future recurrences. Acute attacks are usually treated with high doses of intravenous corticosteroids. Plasmapheresis is also used when patients fail to response to corticosteroids. B lymphocyte inhibitors are used as the maintenance therapy in these patients. First line therapeutic medications include azathioprine and rituximab which are being recommended for long term therapy and second line medications include methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil.
Azathioprine is an immune-modulatory agent which is available in the oral form and don't require hospitalization to be administered, however, because of side effects such as bone marrow suppression and hepatotoxicity, periodic check of blood cells and liver enzymes are needed. Rituximab is a cluster of differentiation antigen 20 inhibitor which leads to decreased B lymphocytes and antibody in patients. This medication is only available in the injectable form and needs hospitalization to be administered. Close monitory is needed during the administration considering severe side effects such as allergic reactions and respiratory distress. However, laboratory tests are not needed in patients taking rituximab although it is more expensive than azathioprine. No clinical trial has been performed previously to compare clinical efficacy of these two drugs in NMO-SD patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare their efficacy through a randomized clinical trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Azathioprine
Patients in this group will receive 50 mg of azathioprine, two times each day and gradually increased to maximum dose of 3 g daily with the aim of lymphocytes count less than 1500.
Azathioprine
Patients are started with Azathioprine 50 mg tablets, taken orally twice a day. The medication dose is increased gradually with the aim of lymphocytes count bellow 1500 and to the maximum dose of 3 g Azathioprine per day. Cell blood count is checked once a week in the first month of treatment, once every two weeks in the second month of treatment, and monthly in the third month of treatment to make decision about medication dose.
Rituximab
Patients in this group will receive 1g of Rituximab in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion with two weeks intervals (as one course) and each course of treatment is repeated every 6 months.
Rituximab
Patients will receive 1 g of Rituximab (two vials of RediTux 500 mg/50 ml) in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion and this will be repeated two weeks later. This cycle will be repeated every 6 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Azathioprine
Patients are started with Azathioprine 50 mg tablets, taken orally twice a day. The medication dose is increased gradually with the aim of lymphocytes count bellow 1500 and to the maximum dose of 3 g Azathioprine per day. Cell blood count is checked once a week in the first month of treatment, once every two weeks in the second month of treatment, and monthly in the third month of treatment to make decision about medication dose.
Rituximab
Patients will receive 1 g of Rituximab (two vials of RediTux 500 mg/50 ml) in 500 cc normal saline serum through intravenous infusion and this will be repeated two weeks later. This cycle will be repeated every 6 months.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Expanded disability status scale between 0 and 7
* Age between 18 and 50 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* Deciding to leave the study by patient
* Lack of consent to enter the study
* Lack of cooperation for follow up
* Severe side effect of the medication
* Treatment with other immunosuppressant medications (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, others) within two months before intervention
* Taking any other immunosuppressant or other type of medication (including herbal drugs) without permission of the physician during the study.
* Presence of other autoimmune disease (including but not limited to Behcet disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and others)
* Presence of liver disorders
* Presence of hematologic disorders
* Presence of heart failure
* Receipt of a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to intervention
* Previous treatment with Azathioporine or Rituximab
* History of HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
* Ongoing daily steroid use
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reaction to monoclonal antibodies
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vahid Shaygannejad
Associate Professor of Neurology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vahid Shaygannejad, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kashani Hospital
Isfahan, , Iran
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sato DK, Lana-Peixoto MA, Fujihara K, de Seze J. Clinical spectrum and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: evolution and current status. Brain Pathol. 2013 Nov;23(6):647-60. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12087.
Morrow MJ, Wingerchuk D. Neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012 Jun;32(2):154-66. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31825662f1.
Costanzi C, Matiello M, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Mandrekar J, Thapa P, McKeon A. Azathioprine: tolerability, efficacy, and predictors of benefit in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2011 Aug 16;77(7):659-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822a2780. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T; Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol. 2014 Jan;261(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
Kim SH, Huh SY, Lee SJ, Joung A, Kim HJ. A 5-year follow-up of rituximab treatment in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1110-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3071.
Katz Sand I. Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016 Jun;22(3):864-96. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000337.
Nikoo Z, Badihian S, Shaygannejad V, Asgari N, Ashtari F. Comparison of the efficacy of azathioprine and rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol. 2017 Sep;264(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8590-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
395275
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.