Nasotracheal Intubation in Children for Outpatient Dental Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02993692

Last Updated: 2018-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-04-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of study was to compare the hemodynamic responses and adverse events associated with nasotracheal intubation (NTI) using a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) and a direct laryngoscope (DLS) in children undergoing general anesthesia for outpatient dental surgery. Eighty children (aged 5-15 years) were scheduled to undergo outpatient dental surgery under general anesthesia and who required nasotracheal intubation were included.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Investigators obtained confirmation from the Inonu University Medical Faculty Hospital Ethics Committee (2015/101) and written informed consent from the guardians of all 80 children. These children, who had a American Society of Anesthesia physical status of I-II, had a Mallampati Score of 1-2, were aged 5-15 years, were scheduled to undergo outpatient dental surgery under general anesthesia, and required nasotracheal intubation were included in this prospective and randomized study. Exclusion criteria included the following: the patient's refusal for study consent, active upper respiratory infection, airway abnormalities, nasal mass or nasal injury, bleeding disorders, allergies to anesthetics, uncontrolled hypertension, morbid obesity, hepatic or renal failure, cardiovascular diseases, a history of nasopharyngeal surgery and those who were difficult to intubate. Children were randomly assigned into the direct laryngoscopy group (n = 40) or the fiberoptic bornchoscopy group (n = 40) according to a computer-randomized table. General anesthesia was administered to children due to the learning difficulties. The number of models was decided by a statistical power analysis after the conclusions from the pretest were obtained. All children fasted at least for 6 h before surgery, and the oral intake of clear fluids was restricted for 2-3 h. Premedication of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) was orally administered in apple juice (0.5 mL/kg of body weight) 1 h prior to anesthesia. After being admitted to the operating room, the patient's systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were continually monitored with a multichannel physiologic monitor and the baseline values for SBP and HR were recorded. Thirty min before the intubation attempt, the nasal mucosa of both nostrils were anesthetized with a topical vasoconstrictor (0.05% xylometazoline spray, and 2% lidocaine 1 mL two times in each nostril) (9) to attenuate cardiovascular responses and adverse events in all children. Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane with eight deep breaths via a face mask, and the patient was maintained on 4% end-tidal sevoflurane, fentanyl 2 µr/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg. NTI was achieved 2 min after rocuronium injection. The more patent nostril was selected for intubation. An experienced anesthetist performed all intubations in the study and an assistant applied the maneuvers (jaw trust) and evaluated the patient during the postoperative visits. All NTIs, both DLS and FOB, were conducted by the same experienced anesthetist (the anesthetist had performed DLS and the FOB nasal intubation in more than 150 patients, including in at least 100 children before the study). A study nurse documented the anesthetic data and timing. In the DLS group, the spiral tube was inserted into the nose and intubated with a Macintosh laryngoscope according to conventional procedures using Magill forceps. In the FOB group, NTI was conducted using an FOB with an outer diameter of 3.1 mm through the selected clear nasal passage with a spiral tracheal tube. The appropriate size of the tracheal tube for a child was determined with the following formula (10): Internal diameter (mm) = age/3 + 3.5 in both groups. The same type of tube was used in each group. Before intubation, enough lidocaine gel was placed on the tracheal tube, and the FOB was guided into patients with a suitable spiral tracheal tube. All tracheal tubes were cuffed and heat-softened in warm normal saline and lubricated to reduce mechanic stimuli to airway structures. During the intubation, the head of the patient was the in supine position, and an assistant applied a jaw thrust for opening the nasopharyngeal passage and improved the image in all patients in the FOB group. If indicated (a suboptimal laryngeal view or resistance in passing of the tracheal tube), anterior laryngeal pressure and tongue withdrawal by digital traction was performed to improve the laryngeal field of view. When the glottis was clearly visible, the FOB was advanced through the vocal cords, and jaw thrust movement was released. To prevent the stimulation of the carina, the tube was placed 4 cm below the glottis, sliding over the FOB. Intubation was verified with the FOB, and end-tidal CO2 concentrations at 35-40 mmHg were monitored. A throat pack was inserted by the anesthetist after the measurements were taken. Anesthesia was maintained with 2% sevoflurane and 50% N20 in oxygen with 1.5 l min-1 fresh gas flow and 35-40 mmHg end-tidal CO2 concentrations. Isolyte-P was administered at rate of 15 mL/kg/h IV, and acetaminophen (15 mg kg-1) was infused for postoperative analgesia in all children.

SBP and HR were recorded at baseline, after induction of anesthesia, at the time of intubation, and 1, 3 and 5 min after intubation. The intubation time (the time from when manual ventilation with a facemask stopped to restarting ventilation via the nasotracheal tube and when carbon dioxide (CO2) was detected by capnography) was recorded by another anesthetist with a digital stopwatch. Nose bleeding after intubation (epistaxis), laryngospasms, bradycardia (HR\<65 beat min-1), hypoxic episodes (SpO2\<90%) and the surgery type were also recorded. Adverse events (hoarseness, sore throat) were assessed 24 h after surgery. If a sore throat developed, additional analgesics were not administered. If bradycardia or desaturation (SpO2\<90%) occurred for more than 2 min, the intubation was interrupted, and patients were ventilated with 100% oxygen and were administered IV atropine (5-10 µg / kg).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nasotracheal Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

fiberoptic bronchoscopy

I want to see the difference between the two group about hemodynamic and intraoculer pressure responses about fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Group Type OTHER

Direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

These devices is used in endotracheal intubation and tonopen for measuring of intraoculer pressure. I want to see whcih is better.

direct laryngoscopy

I want to see the difference between the two group about hemodynamic and intraoculer pressure responses about direct laryngoscopy.

Group Type OTHER

Direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

These devices is used in endotracheal intubation and tonopen for measuring of intraoculer pressure. I want to see whcih is better.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic bronchoscopy

These devices is used in endotracheal intubation and tonopen for measuring of intraoculer pressure. I want to see whcih is better.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

tonopen

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status of I-II, had a Mallampati Score of 1-2, were aged 5-15 years, were scheduled to undergo outpatient dental surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient's refusal for study consent, active upper respiratory infection, airway abnormalities, nasal mass or nasal injury, bleeding disorders, allergies to anesthetics, uncontrolled hypertension, morbid obesity, hepatic or renal failure, cardiovascular diseases, a history of nasopharyngeal surgery and those who were difficult to intubate.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Inonu University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmet Selim Ozkan

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Asozkan

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nasal Ventilation vs Face Mask
NCT03853239 UNKNOWN NA