Expanded Access With ABT-888 (Veliparib) to Treat Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02985658
Last Updated: 2021-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NO_LONGER_AVAILABLE
EXPANDED_ACCESS
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Veliparib, Cisplatin, and Vinorelbine Ditartrate in Treating Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT01104259
Pilot Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) and Lapatinib (Tykerb) in Patients With Metastatic, Triple Negative Breast Cancer
NCT02158507
Veliparib With or Without Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage III or IV Breast Cancer
NCT01149083
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Veliparib (ABT-888) in HER2-negative Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable BRCA-associated Breast Cancer
NCT02163694
Veliparib and Carboplatin in Treating Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT01251874
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since cancer cells are genetically unstable, often exhibiting complex karyotypes that include large deletions, insertions, and unbalanced translocations of chromosomal fragment, these cells are more susceptible than normal tissues to cytotoxicity induced by DNA-damaging agents.Of these, deficiencies in mismatch repair and homologous recombination are associated with the largest number of malignancies, including many sporadic TNBCs. These deficiencies render cells more dependent on PARP for DNA repair and, hence, are more prone to cytotoxicity induced by PARP inhibition. In particular, tumor cells with BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiencies are exquisitely sensitive to PARP inhibition, even in the absence of any other insults. Identification of sporadic TNBC with defects in homologous recombination and mismatch repair independent of germline mutation of BRCA 1 and 2 is an active area of research interest.
PARP-enabled DNA repair may also compensate for the loss of other repair pathways. Higher expression of PARP in cancer cells compared to normal cells has been linked to drug resistance and the overall ability of cancer cells to sustain genotoxic stress.
The combination of platinum based chemotherapy and PARP inhibition may be most effective in TNBC, and particularly in subsets of TNBC. This combination may also be active in tumors with a germline BRCA1-deficiency and/or basal phenotype, since a defect in the DNA double-strand break repair pathway should increase sensitivity to these agents. The addition of a PARP inhibitor to platinum based chemotherapy may induce a "double hit" to tumor cells lacking homologous recombination without causing excess toxicity to normal cells. ABT-888 may be used in combination with the DNA damaging agent, cisplatin, to potentiate its cytotoxic effect and with vinorelbine to enhance tumor response rate. Safety and preliminary efficacy of veliparib in combination with cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with advanced triple negative and BRCA-associated breast cancer has been reported.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Veliparib
Patients will start veliparib at 300 mg po BID days 1 through 21 of the first 21 day cycle, then increase to 400 mg po BID days 1 through 21 of each subsequent cycle, as tolerated by the patient.
At the treating investigator's discretion, and with principal investigator approval, veliparib may be used in combination with cisplatin and/or vinorelbine. Veliparib (300mg) will be dosed po BID on Days 1 through 14 of each 21-day cycle.
The patient will receive therapy as long as there is therapeutic benefit
Cisplatin
Cisplatin will be administered intravenously (75 mg/m2) on Day 1 of each cycle
Vinorelbine
Vinorelbine will be administered intravenously on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 21-day cycle
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Locally recurrent and not amenable to surgical therapy, and/or metastatic breast cancer
* Confirmed HER2-, BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated breast cancer or sporadic triple negative breast cancer.
* No opportunity to receive veliparib under a current clinical trial.
* Patients may have had any number of prior lines of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, immunologic, or biologic regimens for metastatic breast cancer.
* Patients receiving bisphosphonates, denosumab or LHRH-agonists are eligible.
* 18 years and older.
* Performance status \> 60% on the Karnofsky scale (ECOG \< 2).
* Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function as follows:
* Bone Marrow: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1,500/mm3 (1.5 × 109/L); Platelets \> 100,000/mm3 (100 × 109/L); Hemoglobin \> 9.0 g/dL
* Serum creatinine \< 1.5 × upper normal limit of institution's normal range OR creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min/1.73m2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal;
* Hepatic function: AST and/or ALT \< 2.5 × the upper normal limit of institution's normal range.
o For patients with liver metastases, AST and/or ALT \< 5 × the upper normal limit of institution's normal range;
* Bilirubin \< 1.5 × the upper normal limit of institution's normal range;
o Patients with Gilbert's Syndrome may have a bilirubin \> 1.5 × the upper normal limit of institution's normal range.
* Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (one of the following listed below) prior to protocol entry, for the duration of protocol participation and for 90 days following completion of therapy. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 21 days prior to initiation of treatment and/or be confirmed as having postmenopausal status. Criteria for determining menopause include any of the following: prior bilateral oopherectomy; age \> 60 years; age \< 60 years and amenorrheic for at least 12 months in the absence of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or ovarian suppression and FSH and estradiol in the postmenopausal range.
* Total abstinence from sexual intercourse (minimum one complete menstrual cycle);
* Vasectomized partner of female patients;
* Hormonal contraceptives (oral, parenteral or transdermal) for at least 3 months prior to study drug administration;
* Double-barrier method (condoms, contraceptive sponge, diaphragm or vaginal ring with spermicidal jellies or cream);
* IUD (Intra-Uterine Device).
* Additionally, male patients (including those who are vasectomized) whose partners are pregnant or might be pregnant must agree to use condoms for the duration of the treatment plan and for 90 days following completions of therapy.
* Radiation therapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to the enrollment date.
* Patients with known brain metastases must have clinically controlled neurologic symptoms, defined as surgical excision and/or radiation therapy followed by 14 days of stable neurologic function prior to the first dose of study drug.
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically significant and uncontrolled major medical condition(s) including but not limited to:
* Active uncontrolled infection;
* Symptomatic congestive heart failure;
* Unstable angina pectoris or cardiac arrhythmia;
* Psychiatric illness/social situation that would limit compliance with protocol requirements;
* Any medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator, places the patient at an unacceptably high risk for toxicities;
* Myelodysplastic syndrome;
* History of seizures within last 12 months or known neurological disorder pre-disposing to seizures
* Patient is pregnant or lactating.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AbbVie
INDUSTRY
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seattle Cancer Care Allliance
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chiarugi A. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase: killer or conspirator? The 'suicide hypothesis' revisited. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002 Mar;23(3):122-9. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01902-7.
Virag L, Szabo C. The therapeutic potential of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 2002 Sep;54(3):375-429. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.3.375.
Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. Telomeres, stem cells, senescence, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2004 Jan;113(2):160-8. doi: 10.1172/JCI20761.
Curtin NJ, Wang LZ, Yiakouvaki A, Kyle S, Arris CA, Canan-Koch S, Webber SE, Durkacz BW, Calvert HA, Hostomsky Z, Newell DR. Novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, AG14361, restores sensitivity to temozolomide in mismatch repair-deficient cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 1;10(3):881-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1144-3.
Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, Martin NM, Jackson SP, Smith GC, Ashworth A. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):917-21. doi: 10.1038/nature03445.
Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E, Kyle S, Meuth M, Curtin NJ, Helleday T. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005 Apr 14;434(7035):913-7. doi: 10.1038/nature03443.
Wielckens K, Garbrecht M, Kittler M, Hilz H. ADP-ribosylation of nuclear proteins in normal lymphocytes and in low-grade malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma cells. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Feb;104(1):279-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04426.x.
Hirai K, Ueda K, Hayaishi O. Aberration of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) metabolism in human colon adenomatous polyps and cancers. Cancer Res. 1983 Jul;43(7):3441-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RG1716061
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-2020-11567
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9763
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.