CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness

NCT ID: NCT02982122

Last Updated: 2020-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-01

Study Completion Date

2020-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite improvements in management, mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains 25% and only 40% of patients survive without major handicap. Medical/surgical interventions aim to maintain adequate brain perfusion, which is critically dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP); calculated as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). Current guidelines aim for a CPP above 50 mmHg, based on population means. However, this 'one size fits all' approach is flawed, because the relation between CPP and brain perfusion varies between individuals. Further, this approach takes no account of autoregulation, a key protective mechanism that maintains cerebral perfusion despite CPP fluctuations.

Autoregulation is variably preserved following TBI, and there are large between patient variances in the 'optimal' CPP (CPPopt) at which autoregulation operates best. Individual CPPopt can be retrieved automatically by plotting autoregulation data against the CPP over a certain time window. The investigators have shown that maintenance of CPP close to CPPopt is associated with improved outcomes. These data pose the hypothesis that optimisation of management in individuals may be achieved by using the zone of optimal autoregulation as a basis for defining individualised CPP targets.

The investigators propose, together with collaborators in the CPPopt study group (Maastricht, Cambridge, Leuven and Aachen) to set up a pilot (multicenter) feasibility study to develop a protocol for a definitive outcome randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study aims to develop protocols for CPPopt guided critical care, and show that they maintain patients closer to their optimum perfusion levels than standard protocols which keep above a population CPP threshold of 60 mmHg.

Hence, the main objective is to offer clinicians monitoring and therapy algorithms that achieve individualized optimal CPPopt targets and potentially improve TBI outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brain Injuries, Traumatic Cerebrovascular Circulation Homeostasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CPPopt intervention group

Patients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, except for CPP where the CPPopt is targeted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

Intervention Type OTHER

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

CPP control group

Patients are managed according to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines with CPP between 60 and 70 mmHg.

CPPopt information is recorded but hidden for the treating clinicians.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

Intervention Type OTHER

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

For both groups, CPP targets will be achieved first by ICP control if this is raised and then by ABP support by titration (up or down) of vasopressors and fluids according to local protocols.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any adult severe TBI patient requiring multimodality monitoring and ICP-directed therapy for at least 24 hrs on the assessment of the recruiting team.
* Start randomization within 24 hrs after ICU admission.
* Deferred informed consent or deferred proxy assent from relatives/legal representative (consultee).
* Exception for enrolling a patient past the 24 hour window: A patient who is admitted to the hospital and later experiences neuro-worsening that is not due to a systemic insult, (e.g. myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolus, systemic hemorrhage) but due to a presumptive intracranial cause, and subsequently requires an ICP monitor, may be screened for enrolment. Consent, randomization, and monitor placement must be done within 48 hours from injury in order for the patient to qualify.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \< 18 years old.
* Known pregnancy.
* Moribund at presentation (e.g. bilaterally absent pupillary responses)
* Patients with primary decompressive craniectomy.
* Patients already enrolled in \> 1 other research studies.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul Roekaerts, professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academic Hospital Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

The Addenbrooke's Hospital

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aries MJ, Wesselink R, Elting JW, Donnelly J, Czosnyka M, Ercole A, Maurits NM, Smielewski P. Enhanced Visualization of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Over Time to Support Clinical Decision Making. Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):e996-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001816.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27270178 (View on PubMed)

Zuercher P, Groen JL, Aries MJ, Steyerberg EW, Maas AI, Ercole A, Menon DK. Reliability and Validity of the Therapy Intensity Level Scale: Analysis of Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Approach to Assess Management of Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct 1;33(19):1768-1774. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4266. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26866876 (View on PubMed)

Donnelly J, Aries MJ, Czosnyka M. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Feb;15(2):169-85. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.996552.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25614952 (View on PubMed)

Aries MJ, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, Brady KM, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Smielewski P. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2456-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182514eb6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22622398 (View on PubMed)

Beqiri E, Smielewski P, Robba C, Czosnyka M, Cabeleira MT, Tas J, Donnelly J, Outtrim JG, Hutchinson P, Menon D, Meyfroidt G, Depreitere B, Aries MJ, Ercole A. Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 20;9(9):e030727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030727.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31542757 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COGITATE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.