Evaluation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea That Had Undergone Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment
NCT ID: NCT02977338
Last Updated: 2016-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
DISE is a safe procedure, easily practicable, valid and reliable. The investigators consider it a fundamental clinical procedure that is essential before choosing the surgical treatment. The investigator's results so far suggest that a multilevel collapse is significantly associated with higher apnea hypopnea index values. The investigators think that the weight did not play a significant role in RDI reduction. Results till now show that tailored surgery based on DISE may leverage sleep surgeries outcome significantly, presenting 70% success rate based on the investigator's experience The aim of this study is to evaluate surgery results in patients who underwent DISE prior to their surgery in comparison to their condition prior to the treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy for the Optimisation of Treatment of Patients With Obstruction Sleep Apnoea
NCT02855515
Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy for Upper Airway Evaluation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT00695214
Comparison Between Natural Sleep Endoscopy and Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT04729478
DISE: Phenotyping Obstruction Patterns
NCT05050383
Natural Sleep and Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy
NCT03004014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: To evaluate the value of DISE for tailoring the proper treatment for patients with snoring and OSA.
DISE is a safe procedure, easily practicable, valid and reliable. It is considered a fundamental clinical procedure that is essential before choosing the surgical treatment. Results so far suggest that a multilevel collapse is significantly associated with higher apnea hypopnea index values. The investigators think that the weight did not play a significant role in RDI reduction. Results till now show that tailored surgery based on DISE may leverage sleep surgeries outcome significantly, presenting 70% success rate based on the investigator's experience The aim of this tudy is to evaluate surgery results in patients who underwent DISE prior to their surgery in comparison to their condition prior to the treatment.
The results of the DISE based treatment will be compared with literature data from patients who underwent the surgery without DISE.
Method:
A retrospective follow-up study. Patients with snoring and OSA, had sleep study and had DISE before deciding on the surgical treatment. DISE findings were reported using the NOHL and VOTE classifications systems; site, degree of airway narrowing and configuration of obstruction. Patients underwent tailored surgery based on DISE findings included multi-level surgery; palate, tonsils, base of tongue and epiglottis.
After examining the results of the surgery in the patients, a comparison will be made based on sleep laboratory parameters (RDI, minimum saturation, degree of sleep apnea, degree of snoring) with data from the literature for patients who did not undergo DISE. On the whole, the degree of improvement in the patient's condition will be assessed.
We would like to show preference in surgery outcome in patients who were diagnosed using DISE.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retrospective review
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Female or Male
* Fully diagnosed patients with OSA (including sleep laboratory) who are candidates for surgery as a treatment for their condition.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with high surgical risk.
* Patients with hematological and oncological background.
* Pregnancy
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0052-16-HYMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.