Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Non-responders With TRD

NCT ID: NCT02977299

Last Updated: 2022-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

278 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-04-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-site, randomized, open-label, effectiveness trial comparing three treatment arms for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients with TRD who are currently on ongoing, stable and adequate antidepressant therapy (ADT). Adequate ADT is defined as a therapeutically sufficient dose for a sufficient treatment period, which would be expected to be effective as listed in the MGH Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of three open-label treatment arms: a) aripiprazole augmentation, b) rTMS augmentation, and c) switching to venlafaxine XR or Duloxetine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aripiprazole Augmentation

Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics at their current dose throughout the 8-week trial and initiate adjunctive aripiprazole. The starting dose will be 5mg daily. The dose may be reduced to as low as 2mg for tolerability issues (this will be the lowest dose permitted for continuation in the trial). The dose may be adjusted in 2 or 5mg increments. The minimum time per increment will be 7 days. The maximum dose will be set at 15mg daily. For patients who are not on potent cytochrome 2D6 inhibitors (such as paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine) or on potent cytochrome 3A4 inhibitors (such as fluvoxamine and nefazodone) and who are able to tolerate 15mg daily, the maximum dose can be raised to 20mg daily for efficacy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aripiprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

rTMS Augmentation

Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics at their current dose throughout the 8-week trial. We will use clinical TMS stimulators with focal figure-of-eight coils. We will start by measuring the patient´s motor threshold (MT), which is a measure of cortical excitability used to standardize the intensity of stimulation across subjects.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Adjunctive therapy with transcranial magnetic stimulation, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Switching To Venlafaxine XR

Patients randomized to this treatment arm will be instructed to continue all permitted psychotropics throughout the 8-week trial, except for their antidepressant(s). They will be instructed to discontinue all antidepressants and initiate venlafaxine that day, as direct switch to serotonergic antidepressants is well tolerated and avoids loss of precious therapeutic time (Montgomery et al., 2014), including to switching to venlafaxine in STAR\*D (Rush et al., 2006b). For patients who do not prefer a direct switch, or when clinically indicated otherwise in the opinion of the site investigator, a gradual tapering during the screening period will be permitted as long as a direct switch to venlafaxine is made on the baseline visit from the final antidepressant dose. The starting dose of venlafaxine will be 75mg daily. The dose may be reduced to as low as 37.5mg for tolerability issues (this will be the lowest dose permitted for continuation in the trial).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Venlafaxine XR

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral switch therapy with venlafaxine, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aripiprazole

Oral adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Intervention Type DRUG

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Adjunctive therapy with transcranial magnetic stimulation, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Venlafaxine XR

Oral switch therapy with venlafaxine, dose adjusted for effectiveness and tolerability.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Abilify Effexor XR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. women and men ages 18-80,
2. with MDD, of at least 12 weeks duration, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI; Sheehan et al, 1998),
3. have a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS - Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) score of at least 20 at screen and baseline as assessed by site clinicians,
4. meet criteria for TRD during the current major depressive episode documented in the MGH Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire (ATRQ) (Chandler et al., 2010), which will be defined as being non-responders (less than 50% of symptom improvement) to two or more depression treatment trials of adequate dose and duration as defined by the MGH ATRQ,
5. are currently on an antidepressant of adequate dose (as defined by the MGH ATRQ) and duration (at least 8 weeks), with the antidepressant dose being stable over the past four weeks, and with documented (in the MGH ATRQ) non-response (less than 50% improvement) to the current antidepressant.
6. Patients who have passed the MGH CTNI remote assessment, with documentation provided to sites by MGH CTNI.

Exclusion Criteria

1. pregnant or breastfeeding women, women of childbearing potential who are not using an accepted means of birth control, or women with a positive urine pregnancy test,
2. patients who have received treatment with rTMS, aripiprazole, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or venlafaxine during the current episode,
3. patients who express an objection to receiving treatment with at least one of the three treatment arms of our study,
4. patients with any history of bipolar disorder or psychosis (diagnosed by MINI),
5. patients with active alcohol or substance abuse disorders within the past 6 months (diagnosed by MINI),
6. patients with suicidal ideation of the degree that, in the opinion of the evaluating clinician, participation in the study would place them at significantly increased risk of suicide,
7. patients with unstable medical issues of such degree that, in the opinion of the evaluating clinician, participation in the study would place them at significant risk of a serious adverse event, or patients with a screening hemoglobin A1c level greater than 7.5%, or patients with epilepsy, dementia, Parkinson's disease, or Huntington's Disease,
8. patients who have received treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS),
9. patients who have not responded to more than five FDA-approved antidepressant treatment trials of adequate dose and duration during the current episode, or who did not respond to ECT in previous episodes
10. patients on excluded medications,
11. patients with a positive urine screen drug test for a substance for which they do not have a valid prescription for a valid medical reason,
12. patients with currently abnormal thyroid function tests,
13. patients who have received at least one dose of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) four weeks or less prior, and
14. for patients on concomitant psychotropic agents (anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, opiates, triiodothyronine (T3), modafinil, psychostimulants, buspirone, melatonin, omega-3 fatty acids, folate, l-methylfolate, s-adenosyl methionine, lithium) not on the same dose for at least four weeks prior to study entry or who do not agree to continue at the same dose during the acute phase of the study.
15. Patients who do not meet safety criteria for TMS: history of seizures, cardiac pacemaker, DBS or VNS, brain aneurism clips or other metallic implants in the intracranial space.
16. Also excluded is an individual who has received any administration of ketamine in the current episode for the treatment of depression.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

George I. Papakostas

Scientific Director, MGH Clinical Trial Network and Institute (CTNI)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Alabama School of Medicine

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Pacific Institute of Medical Research

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

New York University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Roper St. Francis Hospital

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

University of Manitoba St. Boniface Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guidetti C, Chaikali S, Trivedi MH, Shelton RC, Iosifescu DV, Thase ME, Jha MK, Mathew SH, DeBattista C, Dokucu ME, Brawman-Mintzer O, Hernandez Ortiz JM, Currier GW, McCall WV, Modirrousta M, Macaluso M, Bystritsky A, Vila-Rodriguez F, Nelson EB, Yeung AS, MacGregor LC, Carmody T, Fava M, Papakostas GI. Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Nonresponders With Treatment Resistant Depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD): Effect of Aripiprazole or Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation Versus Switching to the Antidepressant Venlafaxine on Quality of Life. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 11;86(3):24m15614. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15614.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40801757 (View on PubMed)

Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH, Shelton RC, Iosifescu DV, Thase ME, Jha MK, Mathew SJ, DeBattista C, Dokucu ME, Brawman-Mintzer O, Currier GW, McCall WV, Modirrousta M, Macaluso M, Bystritsky A, Rodriguez FV, Nelson EB, Yeung AS, Feeney A, MacGregor LC, Carmody T, Fava M. Comparative effectiveness research trial for antidepressant incomplete and non-responders with treatment resistant depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD) a randomized clinical trial. Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;29(8):2287-2295. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02468-x. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38454079 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015P002430

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Salicylic Augmentation in Depression
NCT03152409 TERMINATED PHASE2