VA Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT01421342

Last Updated: 2018-05-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1522 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall purpose is to determine research based 'next-steps' for outpatients with major depressive disorder who have not had satisfactory outcomes to standard 'first-step' treatments. The primary objective is to compare the acute (up to 12 weeks) treatment effectiveness of augmenting an antidepressant with aripiprazole or with bupropion-slow release (SR) vs. switching treatment to bupropion-SR monotherapy on symptom remission in Veterans with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not achieved optimal response after an adequate trial on antidepressant (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor \[SSRI\] or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor \[SNRI\] or mirtazapine) monotherapy. The secondary objectives are to compare the acute (up to 12 weeks) and long term (up to 36 weeks) efficacy, safety, effects on functioning, suicidality, quality of life, anxiety and other associated symptoms, costs and cost-effectiveness of each of the three treatments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall aim of VAST-D is to enhance treatment outcomes for representative outpatients diagnosed with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) and treated in primary or psychiatric VA care settings. In particular, VAST-D is designed to determine the comparative effectiveness of different treatment options for participants with MDD who fail to have a satisfactory outcome to treatment with their initial antidepressants.

These options may be conceptualized as representing two overall treatment strategies: 1) Medication Switch - switching from the initial antidepressant to another antidepressant medication, specifically bupropion-SR and 2) Medication Augmentation - augmenting the initial antidepressant with a second antidepressant, specifically bupropion-SR or a second generation antipsychotic, specifically aripiprazole. VAST-D's primary goal is to determine which of these 3 treatment strategies is most likely to lead to remission. Other key objectives include comparisons of response, time to remission, time to response, relapse, anxiety symptoms, suicidal ideation and behaviors, side effects, tolerability, quality of life, health related costs and satisfaction with participation in the study.

VAST-D will enroll 1518 total patients of both genders and all ethnic/racial and socioeconomic backgrounds. All patients will meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV-TR (text revised) criteria for nonpsychotic MDD. The diagnostic criteria for eligibility will be established by clinical interview supplemented with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Final determination for eligibility will be made by the study clinician. Only participants with a suboptimal outcome to a well documented, adequately delivered (dose and duration), trial with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) or mirtazapine will be eligible for the study. Failure to achieve an adequate outcome will be ascertained by a score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician rated (QIDS-C16) scale \>= 16 (considered severe depression) after at least 6 weeks of treatment or QIDS-C16 \>= 11 (considered moderately severe depression) after at least 8 weeks of treatment. Otherwise, the inclusion criteria are broad and the exclusion criteria are few; participants with most comorbid general medical or psychiatric disorders are generally included to provide a broadly representative sample.

Participants will be randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to switch to bupropion-SR alone (n=506), current antidepressant plus bupropion-SR (n=506), or current antidepressant plus aripiprazole (n=506). Treatment will be guided by clinician-rated symptom measures (the PHQ-9) and global side effects measures (the Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating or FIBSER) obtained at each treatment visit. Acute treatment visits will occur at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 to ensure delivery of appropriate and yet vigorous and tolerable pharmacotherapy. Participants who tolerate the acute treatment and achieve adequate response at 12 weeks will enter the 24-week Continuation Treatment phase, during which the initial treatment will continue and visits will occur every four weeks subsequently until patients have been followed for 36 weeks post-randomization. The QIDS-C16 will be administered at baseline and at each follow-up visit by an independent evaluator (who will be blinded to treatment assignment) to measure symptoms of depression for the study outcomes of remission, response and relapse. Neither the participant nor the treating clinician will be blinded to treatment.

Primary hypotheses:

Primary hypothesis 1.a: Remission rate from major depressive disorder will be higher in patients whose treatment is augmented with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR) compared to those switched to bupropion-SR monotherapy.

Primary Hypothesis 1.b: Remission rate from major depressive disorder will be higher in patients whose treatment is augmented with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole) compared to those switched to bupropion-SR monotherapy.

Secondary hypotheses:

Secondary Hypothesis 2.a: Remission rate will be greater in patients whose treatment is augmented with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR) than in those augmented with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole).

Secondary Hypothesis 2.b: Relapse rate (within 36 weeks of the initiation of treatment) will be lower in patients whose antidepressant is augmented with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR) than in those whose antidepressant is switched to bupropion-SR monotherapy.

Secondary Hypothesis 2.c: Relapse rate (within 36 weeks of the initiation of treatment) will be lower in patients whose treatment is augmented with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole) vs. those switched to bupropion-SR monotherapy.

Secondary Hypothesis 2.d: Relapse rate (within 36 weeks of the initiation of treatment) will be lower in patients whose treatment is augmented with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR) than in patients whose treatment was augmented with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole).

Secondary Hypothesis 2.e: The proportion of patients who develop akathisia, other akathisia-like side effects (e.g., tremor, irritability, motor restlessness) and extrapyramidal side effects will be greater in the patients whose antidepressant treatment is augmented with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole) compared to patients whose treatment is augmented with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR), or switched to bupropion-SR monotherapy.

Secondary Hypothesis 2.f: The relative costs (direct and indirect) of augmenting an antidepressant with aripiprazole (antidepressant + aripiprazole) will be greater than the costs of antidepressant augmentation with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR), and the costs of antidepressant augmentation with bupropion-SR (antidepressant + bupropion-SR) will be greater than the costs of switching to bupropion-SR monotherapy, and augmentation and monotherapy with bupropion-SR will be more cost-effective than aripiprazole augmentation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Switching: Bupropion-SR

Switching: Bupropion-SR

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Switching: Bupropion-SR

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupropion-SR (Dose: 150 mg - 400 mg taken per day orally for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with bupropion-SR dose of 150 mg, then increasing dose per protocol up to 400 mg (200 mg BID), maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Bupropion-SR

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Bupropion-SR

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Bupropion-SR

Intervention Type DRUG

Current antidepressant (either a SSRI or a SNRI or mirtazapine): Continue the dose prescribed at time of enrollment, or adjust depending on response or side effect profile for up to 36 weeks.

And

Bupropion-SR (Dose: 150 mg - 400 mg taken per day orally for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with bupropion-SR dose of 150 mg, then increasing dose per protocol up to 400 mg (200 mg BID), maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Aripiprazole

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Aripiprazole

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Aripiprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Current antidepressant (either a SSRI or a SNRI or mirtazapine): Continue the dose prescribed at time of enrollment or adjust depending on response or side effect profile for up to 36 weeks.

And

Aripiprazole (Dose: 2 mg - 15 mg taken orally once per day for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with aripiprazole dose of 2 mg for one week, then increasing dose per protocol up to 15 mg, maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Switching: Bupropion-SR

Bupropion-SR (Dose: 150 mg - 400 mg taken per day orally for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with bupropion-SR dose of 150 mg, then increasing dose per protocol up to 400 mg (200 mg BID), maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Intervention Type DRUG

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Bupropion-SR

Current antidepressant (either a SSRI or a SNRI or mirtazapine): Continue the dose prescribed at time of enrollment, or adjust depending on response or side effect profile for up to 36 weeks.

And

Bupropion-SR (Dose: 150 mg - 400 mg taken per day orally for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with bupropion-SR dose of 150 mg, then increasing dose per protocol up to 400 mg (200 mg BID), maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Intervention Type DRUG

Augmenting: Antidepressant + Aripiprazole

Current antidepressant (either a SSRI or a SNRI or mirtazapine): Continue the dose prescribed at time of enrollment or adjust depending on response or side effect profile for up to 36 weeks.

And

Aripiprazole (Dose: 2 mg - 15 mg taken orally once per day for up to 36 weeks): Initiating with aripiprazole dose of 2 mg for one week, then increasing dose per protocol up to 15 mg, maintaining or decreasing dose for up to 36 weeks depending on response and side effect profile through the acute and continuation phases.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* DSM-IV diagnosis of single or recurrent, non-psychotic, major depressive disorder
* Currently taking a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) or mirtazapine for major depressive disorder
* Need for "next-step" treatment based on documented suboptimal outcome from current antidepressant treatment for major depressive episode (at least 6 weeks treatment with a QIDS-C16 \>= 16 or at least 8 weeks with a QIDS-C16 \>= 11; and at least 3 weeks at a stable "optimal" dose
* Age: 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior inadequate response after an adequate treatment trial or clear cut intolerance to either of the study medications (aripiprazole or bupropion)
* Current treatment with bupropion, aripiprazole or any other antipsychotic agent
* Lifetime history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified
* Current diagnosis of Dementia
* Current diagnosis of an eating disorder or a seizure disorder
* High suicide risk currently requiring acute intervention (other than outpatient treatment of depression)
* Unstable, serious medical condition or one requiring acute medical treatment, or anticipation of hospitalization for extended care
* Requiring immediate hospitalization for psychiatric disorders
* Taking any concomitant medication that contraindicates any of treatment options or augmenting agents known to have an antidepressant effect
* Concurrent or recent participation (within the last 30 days) in another conflicting clinical trial with a mental health, investigational drug, or medical device intervention
* Female - pregnant or lactating or planning to become pregnant
* Patient was not able or willing to provide informed consent; or changed mind about participating prior to randomization
* Patient was not referred to the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Somaia Mohamed, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Sidney Zisook, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

West Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Asheville VA Medical Center, Asheville, NC

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Memphis VA Medical Center, Memphis, TN

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salem VA Medical Center, Salem, VA

Salem, Virginia, United States

Site Status

VA Puget Sound Health Care System American Lake Division, Tacoma, WA

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Clarksburg Louis A. Johnson VA Medical Center, Clarksburg, WV

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mohamed S, Johnson GR, Vertrees JE, Guarino PD, Weingart K, Young IT, Yoon J, Gleason TC, Kirkwood KA, Kilbourne AM, Gerrity M, Marder S, Biswas K, Hicks P, Davis LL, Chen P, Kelada A, Huang GD, Lawrence DD, LeGwin M, Zisook S. The VA augmentation and switching treatments for improving depression outcomes (VAST-D) study: Rationale and design considerations. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;229(3):760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26279130 (View on PubMed)

Zisook S, Tal I, Weingart K, Hicks P, Davis LL, Chen P, Yoon J, Johnson GR, Vertrees JE, Rao S, Pilkinton PD, Wilcox JA, Sapra M, Iranmanesh A, Huang GD, Mohamed S. Characteristics of U.S. Veteran Patients with Major Depressive Disorder who require "next-step" treatments: A VAST-D report. J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.023. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27479536 (View on PubMed)

Mohamed S, Johnson GR, Chen P, Hicks PB, Davis LL, Yoon J, Gleason TC, Vertrees JE, Weingart K, Tal I, Scrymgeour A, Lawrence DD, Planeta B, Thase ME, Huang GD, Zisook S; and the VAST-D Investigators; Rao SD, Pilkinton PD, Wilcox JA, Iranmanesh A, Sapra M, Jurjus G, Michalets JP, Aslam M, Beresford T, Anderson KD, Fernando R, Ramaswamy S, Kasckow J, Westermeyer J, Yoon G, D'Souza DC, Larson G, Anderson WG, Klatt M, Fareed A, Thompson SI, Carrera CJ, Williams SS, Juergens TM, Albers LJ, Nasdahl CS, Villarreal G, Winston JL, Nogues CA, Connolly KR, Tapp A, Jones KA, Khatkhate G, Marri S, Suppes T, LaMotte J, Hurley R, Mayeda AR, Niculescu AB 3rd, Fischer BA, Loreck DJ, Rosenlicht N, Lieske S, Finkel MS, Little JT. Effect of Antidepressant Switching vs Augmentation on Remission Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Antidepressant Treatment: The VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):132-145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8036.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28697253 (View on PubMed)

Zisook S, Johnson GR, Planeta B, Mohamed S. How Does Positive Mental Health Affect Next-Step Treatment Outcomes in Treatment-Resistant Depression? A VAST-D Report. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Sep-Oct 01;45(5):421-431. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000002051. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40742171 (View on PubMed)

Zisook S, Planeta B, Hicks PB, Chen P, Davis LL, Villarreal G, Sapra M, Johnson GR, Mohamed S. Childhood adversity and adulthood major depressive disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 May-Jun;76:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35366613 (View on PubMed)

Zisook S, Johnson GR, Hicks P, Chen P, Beresford T, Michalets JP, Rao S, Thase ME, Wilcox J, Sevilimedu V, Mohamed S. Continuation phase treatment outcomes for switching, combining, or augmenting strategies for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: A VAST-D report. Depress Anxiety. 2021 Feb;38(2):185-195. doi: 10.1002/da.23114. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33225492 (View on PubMed)

Mohamed S, Johnson GR, Sevilimedu V, Rao SD, Hicks PB, Chen P, Lauro K, Jurjus G, Pilkinton P, Davis L, Wilcox JA, Iranmanesh A, Sapra M, Aslam M, Michalets J, Thase M, Zisook S; CSP#576 VAST-D Investigators. Impact of Concurrent Posttraumatic Stress Disorder on Outcomes of Antipsychotic Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder With a Prior Failed Treatment: VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 23;81(4):19m13038. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m13038.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32603560 (View on PubMed)

Zisook S, Johnson GR, Tal I, Hicks P, Chen P, Davis L, Thase M, Zhao Y, Vertrees J, Mohamed S. General Predictors and Moderators of Depression Remission: A VAST-D Report. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;176(5):348-357. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18091079. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30947531 (View on PubMed)

Yoon J, Zisook S, Park A, Johnson GR, Scrymgeour A, Mohamed S. Comparing Cost-Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Augmentation With Other "Next-Step" Depression Treatment Strategies: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 18;80(1):18m12294. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12294.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30695291 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

576

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

5-HTP and Creatine for Depression R33 Phase
NCT05895747 RECRUITING PHASE2