Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
270 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2022-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myocardial Flow Reserve and 99mTc-DTPA Cardiac Dynamic SPECT
NCT02844686
Efficiency and Outcomes of Stress-Only Anger and D-SPECT Stress-Only SPECT MPI
NCT01373944
DEFINing the PrEvalence and Characteristics of Coronary Artery Disease Among Patients With TYPE 2 Myocardial Infarction Using CT-FFR
NCT04864119
Single-scan Rest/Stress Imaging With Cadmium Zinc Telluride-based SPECT for Coronary Flow Quantification
NCT02985931
Dynamic CT Perfusion for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease
NCT04712513
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FFRct versus SPECT
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of FFRct and SPECT in subjects with suspected stable CAD
FFRct and SPECT
enable the comparison of diagnostic performance of FFRct and SPECT in subjects with suspected stable CAD after abnormal SPECT imaging who have no contraindications to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FFRct and SPECT
enable the comparison of diagnostic performance of FFRct and SPECT in subjects with suspected stable CAD after abnormal SPECT imaging who have no contraindications to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Providing written informed consent
* Subjects with abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging results who have been referred for clinically indicated ICA within 90-days of SPECT.
* Ability to undergo cCTA
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior, clinically documented, myocardial infarction (MI).
* Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
* Prior coronary stenting
* Evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability including unstable angina, intractable arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, unstable BP, and severe CHF (NYHA class III or IV) or acute pulmonary edema
* Contraindications for cCTA such as:
1. Presence of pacemaker or internal defibrillator leads such that coronary visualization is impaired
2. Chronic atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled ventricular response
3. Known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast that cannot be pre-medicated
4. Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in women of childbearing age
5. Contraindication to acute beta blockade
6. Contraindication to acute sublingual nitrate administration
7. Prosthetic heart valve such that coronary visualization is impaired
* Contraindications for FFRct such as:
1. Complex congenital heart disease other than anomalous coronary origins alone
2. Ventricular septal defect with known Qp/Qs \> 1.4
* Requiring an emergent procedure within 48 hours of presentation
* Any active, serious, life-threatening disease with life expectancy less than 2 months
* Inability to comply with study procedures
* Current participation in any other clinical trial involving an investigational device, drug, or dictating care pathways at the time of enrollment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baylor Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Brown, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
016-096
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.