Strategies to Improve the HIV Care Continuum Among Key Populations in India

NCT ID: NCT02969915

Last Updated: 2025-12-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2314 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-30

Study Completion Date

2024-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of integrated care centers vs. integrated care centers plus HIV patient treatment incentives for achieving HIV treatment targets among people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India. The investigators will also assess cost-effectiveness and barriers and facilitators to implementation through targeted mixed-methods approaches. This study is a model for improving HIV treatment outcomes in key populations in low to middle-income countries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The trajectory of the HIV epidemic in coming decades will be determined by the degree to which we can identify infected persons and engage them in care - a point implicit in the ambitious UNAIDS "90-90-90" target, which sets 90% goals for HIV diagnosis, linkage of infected persons to sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression in those treated. Meeting this target requires successful engagement of difficult to reach populations, such as people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM), who bear a disproportionate share of the epidemic, particularly in low to middle income countries. Our team is nearing completion of a multi-site cluster-randomized trial in India to assess the effectiveness of integrated care centers (ICCs) for PWID and MSM compared to usual care. ICC process measures from the first year show robust uptake of HIV counseling and testing, the primary outcome for that trial, but slower than anticipated ART uptake. Demand-side interventions in public health (such as treatment incentives) can be particularly effective when paired with optimized treatment accessibility (i.e., supply). Consequently, the investigators propose to examine whether provision of HIV care and treatment incentives to ICC clients will improve overall utilization of the clinics and downstream HIV care continuum outcomes.

The investigators propose a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. This will include a 16-site, pair-matched cluster randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of adding of HIV care incentives to ICCs (ICC+) versus standard ICCs on HIV care continuum outcomes, including ART initiation, adherence and viral suppression. Effectiveness will be compared at the ICC level (from a cohort of HIV-infected ART-eligible clients followed in each ICC and process measures deriving from all ICC clients) and at the community-level through a cross-sectional sample accrued via respondent-driven sampling (RDS) 2 years after initiation of the intervention. Because PWID and MSM will be sampled independently from the ICCs in the RDS, it provides an opportunity to characterize outcomes like community viral load and HIV incidence, reflecting impact within the broader PWID/MSM communities. As an exploratory sub-aim, we will use a rigorous scientific design to assess the effects of withdrawing (vs. continuing) incentives beyond the initial intervention phase. Additionally, the investigators will determine the cost-effectiveness of the ICC+ intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Matched-pair cluster-randomized trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Integrated care centers

Participants in the active comparator arm have access to integrated care centers (ICCs)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Integrated Care Centers

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

ICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services

ICC + incentives

Participants in the experimental arm have access to the ICC intervention and the incentive intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Incentives

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment incentives are offered to HIV-positive participants for reaching treatment targets, including retention to medical follow-up, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and maintaining high adherence with antiretroviral therapy.

Integrated Care Centers

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

ICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incentives

Treatment incentives are offered to HIV-positive participants for reaching treatment targets, including retention to medical follow-up, initiating antiretroviral therapy, and maintaining high adherence with antiretroviral therapy.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Integrated Care Centers

ICCs offer key-population-oriented, vertically-integrated harm reduction, HIV testing, and HIV treatment services

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ICC+ ICC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Speaks Hindi, English, or local language
* HIV-positive
* Antiretroviral therapy (ART) naive or has used ART less than 12 months
* Registered client at the local integrated care center (ICC), which serves either people who inject drugs (PWID) or men who have sex with men (MSM).

Exclusion Criteria

* Not competent to provide informed consent or participate in the study.
* Receives HIV care in the private sector
* Plans to migrate in next 12 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Elton John AIDS Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shruti H Mehta, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Gregory M Lucas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

YR Gaitonde Center for AIDS Research and Education

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Solomon SS, McFall AM, Srikrishnan AK, Verma V, Anand S, Khan RT, Kushwaha BS, Vasudevan C, Saravanan S, Paneerselvam N, Kumar MS, Das C, Celentano DD, Mehta SH, Lucas GM. Voucher incentives to improve viral suppression among HIV-positive people who inject drugs and men who have sex with men in India: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2024 May;11(5):e309-e320. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(24)00005-5. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38583461 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DA041034

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

K24DA035684

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00082575

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Enhancing Communication and HIV Outcomes
NCT00675610 COMPLETED PHASE3
Youth Ending the HIV Epidemic
NCT05789875 COMPLETED NA