A Commitment Device for Medication Adherence Among HIV Patients

NCT ID: NCT01455740

Last Updated: 2017-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We used a randomized trial design combined with a comparison to a non-randomized control group to study patients on appropriate antiretroviral therapy (ART) having virologic failure within a publicly-funded HIV clinic serving Atlanta, GA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study demonstrated the feasibility of using commitment contracts in HIV care. Many previous interventions have produced statistically significant effects on ART adherence that do not persist after the intervention ends. A notable feature of our study is that after the incentives for ART adherence and provider visits were removed, participants who had been offered a commitment contract for ART adherence were more likely to achieve virologic suppression relative to individuals who had been assigned a conditional cash transfer for provider visits and relative to individuals who had been assigned the standard of care, although the difference was only statistically significant in the latter comparison. There were differences in the prevalence of missing outcomes across groups, but these differences were not statistically significant for the unanticipated post-incentive visit and therefore were unlikely to be the explanation for the results. Thus, financial rewards coupled with individual choice can increase engagement in healthy behaviors after incentives are removed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome HIV

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome HIV Commitment Financial Incentives

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study used a randomized trial design for two treatment arms: (i) Participants in the provider visit incentive (PVI) arm were told that they would receive $30 after attending each scheduled provider visit (a CCT). (ii) Participants in the incentive choice (IC) were given a choice between the above CCT and a commitment contract, which made the $30 payment conditional on the patient attending the provider visit and meeting an ART adherence threshold. A block randomization scheme, stratified on whether or no the majority of the participant's three previous viral load measurements were suppressed, assigned 21 individuals to the PVI arm and 19 to the IC arm.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Provider Visit Incentive (PVI)

Participants were told that they would receive $30 after attending each scheduled provider visit (a CCT).

A block randomization scheme, stratified on whether or not the majority of the participant's three previous viral load measurements were suppressed, assigned 21 individuals to the PVI arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Provider Visit Incentive (PVI)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants received the standard of care (SOC), which included not only medical care but also a wide range of social services. In addition, participants in the PVI arm received financial incentives designed to motivate health-improving behaviors. After the initial study enrollment visit, participants in the PVI arm received a $30 payment each time they showed up as scheduled for one of their next four HIV primary care visits.

Participants in the PVI arm were also asked to return for a sixth, unanticipated study visit approximately three months after the last of the four study visits to which the incentive scheme applied. To reduce attrition, participants were offered $100 for showing up to the fifth and sixth study visits.

Incentive Choice (IC)

Participants were given a choice between the CCT described in the PVI arm and a commitment contract, which made the $30 payment conditional on the patient attending the provider visit AND meeting an ART adherence threshold.

A block randomization scheme, stratified on whether or not the majority of the participant's three previous viral load measurements were suppressed, assigned 19 individuals to the IC arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Incentive Choice (IC)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

All participants received the SOC. In addition, participants in the IC arm received financial incentives designed to motivate health-improving behaviors. At the initial study enrollment visit, participants in the IC arm chose between either the incentive scheme assigned to the PVI arm or an incentive scheme that tied payments to clinic attendance and ART medication adherence. Participants who selected the 2nd option received a $30 payment at each of their next 4 HIV primary care visits if the (i) showed up as scheduled and (ii) presented a dose-recording pill bottle cap indicating that they correctly took at least 90% of doses of a sentinal medication since the previous study visit.

Participants in the IC arm were also asked to return for a 6th, unanticipated study visit approximately three months after the last of the 4 study visits to which the incentive scheme applied. To reduce attrition, participants were offered $100 for showing up to the 5th and 6th study visits.

Passive Control (PC)

The study also included 70 individuals in a PC arm, who did not receive financial incentives. Individuals in the PC arm were not enrolled in the randomized trial but met basic study eligibility criteria during the same time period.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Provider Visit Incentive (PVI)

All participants received the standard of care (SOC), which included not only medical care but also a wide range of social services. In addition, participants in the PVI arm received financial incentives designed to motivate health-improving behaviors. After the initial study enrollment visit, participants in the PVI arm received a $30 payment each time they showed up as scheduled for one of their next four HIV primary care visits.

Participants in the PVI arm were also asked to return for a sixth, unanticipated study visit approximately three months after the last of the four study visits to which the incentive scheme applied. To reduce attrition, participants were offered $100 for showing up to the fifth and sixth study visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Incentive Choice (IC)

All participants received the SOC. In addition, participants in the IC arm received financial incentives designed to motivate health-improving behaviors. At the initial study enrollment visit, participants in the IC arm chose between either the incentive scheme assigned to the PVI arm or an incentive scheme that tied payments to clinic attendance and ART medication adherence. Participants who selected the 2nd option received a $30 payment at each of their next 4 HIV primary care visits if the (i) showed up as scheduled and (ii) presented a dose-recording pill bottle cap indicating that they correctly took at least 90% of doses of a sentinal medication since the previous study visit.

Participants in the IC arm were also asked to return for a 6th, unanticipated study visit approximately three months after the last of the 4 study visits to which the incentive scheme applied. To reduce attrition, participants were offered $100 for showing up to the 5th and 6th study visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Attended the Grady Health System Infectious Disease Program (IDP)
* Most recent HIV-1 plasma RNA viral load (pVL) \> 200 copies/mL; this value must have been measured within the prior 18 months and at least 6 months after starting the current ART regimen
* English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Using pillboxes
* Were planning to relocate
* Were enrolled in another trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David I Laibson, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Bureau of Economic Research, Harvard University

Vincent Marconi, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University Ponce Clinic

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alsan M, Beshears J, Armstrong WS, Choi JJ, Madrian BC, Nguyen MLT, Del Rio C, Laibson D, Marconi VC. A commitment contract to achieve virologic suppression in poorly adherent patients with HIV/AIDS. AIDS. 2017 Jul 31;31(12):1765-1769. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001543.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28514277 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id