Long Term Survivors of High-grade Glioma and Their Caregivers
NCT ID: NCT02965144
Last Updated: 2020-06-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
13 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-31
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This mixed methods study aims to address perspectives on daily life experiences of long-term survivors with HGG and their caregivers as well as the needs and preferences for support, rehabilitation and palliation.
Separate telephone interviews with patients and their caregivers and self-reported questionnaires for patients will be conducted. The mixed methods design is a convergent sequential design using an identical sampling.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nurse-led Family and Network Consultations
NCT03458312
Treatment Decision-making in Patients With Recurrent High-grade Glioma
NCT04013828
A Supportive Group Intervention for Caregivers to Patients Diagnosed With a Glioblastoma
NCT06869577
Quality of Life and Patient Needs in Advanced High Grade Gliomas
NCT05039346
Experiences and Needs of Patients With a High-grade Glioma and Their Caregivers
NCT01638130
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Information about socio-economic conditions, disease and treatment variables will be obtained by the investigator at baseline. Disease, treatment and clinical variables will be collected including the World Health Organization (WHO) performance scale (PS) which will be obtained by medical chart review. The self-reported questionnaires (quantitative data) are viewed as a useful supplemental data source, and embrace the topics as distress, anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Theoretical Framework The qualitative and quantitative research components represent different paradigmatic traditions including diverse ontological, epistemological and methodological assumptions. However, these paradigms are not necessarily incompatible. This study applied a pragmatic paradigm, reflecting a pluralistic view using both inductive and deductive reasoning. Applying a qualitative perspective, the present interviews seek to capture the subjective experiences of the study participants related to their life situation.
Analysis The semi-structured interviews will be recorded and transcribed in full length by the interviewer. Interview data will be transferred to NVivo 10 (qualitative data analysis computer software package) software program. A thematic analysis will be conducted for the analysis of the semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis is a basic method for qualitative analysis as it identifies, analyzes and reports themes and patterns within data. The findings will be presented in themes and subthemes. A theme is an expression or context being defined as important by the researchers. In this study a theme is not necessarily dependent on quantifiable measures, but rather captures an important meaning in relation to the research questions and aims. Data from the interviews are descriptive in nature and reflect the subjective experience of the life situation of patients with HGG and their caregivers. The steps for thematic analysis are inspired by Braun and Clarke and as follows; Step 1) Data are transcribed immediately after an interview by the investigator or a research assistant. Transcriptions are read several times until the investigators are familiar with the depth and extent of the content. This process guides the investigators to the next level of analysis. Step 2) The text is read and divided into units of meanings, which are identified by the investigators. Some meaning units are sentences, others a whole paragraph. In this process data are coded in order to organize them into meaningful groups. This process assures that the whole dataset is systematically worked through by the investigators. Step 3) Then, the codes are analyzed in order to consider if different codes can be combined into mutual themes. This three step process will result in a collection of themes and sub-themes.
Statistical analysis The PS, the The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) sub-scales, the The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, General and brain cancer (FACT-G and FACT-Br) sub-scales and the responses to the ordinal items of the leisure time physical activity scale will be analysed separately. Socio-economic information and data from questionnaires will be entered into a database. The questionnaires will be analyzed according to their manuals. Categorical variables will be reported as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviations (s.d.) using a significance level of p\\0.05. HADS and FACT-Br data refer to the normative values. The statistical analysis will be performed with SAS (Statistical Analysis System) statistical software, version 9.3.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HGG patients
single-group study- long term survivors
no treatment
no treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
no treatment
no treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* not able to participate in being interviewed
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karin Piil
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karin Piil, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Piil K, Christensen IJ, Grunnet K, Poulsen HS. Health-related quality of life and caregiver perspectives in glioblastoma survivors: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(e6):e846-e854. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001777. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LTS01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.