ACURATE Neo™ TA Delivery System in Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT02950428

Last Updated: 2023-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-18

Study Completion Date

2021-09-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this investigation is to collect data pertaining to the safety and performance of the ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis as implanted with the ACURATE neo (TM) TA Transapical Delivery System. This device is intended for treatment of subjects with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who have high risk for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. The ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis is intended for use via minimally-invasive transapical implantation in a well-defined population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a single arm, prospective, multicenter non randomised and open trial of the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open heart surgery is considered to be high risk. All patients will be followed up to 5 years after the intervention.

The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and performance of the study device in patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis considered to be high risk for surgery Secondary objective is to evaluate adverse events and study device performance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System

Patients implanted with ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System

Intervention Type DEVICE

ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™TA Transapical Delivery System on patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open-heart surgery is considered to be high risk

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System

ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™TA Transapical Delivery System on patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open-heart surgery is considered to be high risk

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject must be at least 18 years old
2. Severe aortic stenosis defined as:

* Mean aortic gradient \> 40 mmHg or
* Peak jet velocity \> 4.0 m/s or
* Aortic valve area of \< 0.8 cm2
3. High risk patient determined by a multidisciplinary heart team consensus (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) that patient is not a surgical candidate for conventional AVR due to risk factors such as STS Score (8% or higher) or other co-morbid conditions unrelated to aortic stenosis such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chest deformities and irradiated mediastinum
4. NYHA Functional Class \> II
5. Multidisciplinary heart team (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) consensus that the transapical approach is the most suitable access route for TAVI due to the presence of the following anatomic conditions:

* porcelain aorta or
* severely calcified or highly tortuous peripheral vasculature not appropriate for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation or
* vessels too small for retrograde approach or
* other anatomical conditions making transapical approach more suitable
6. Aortic annulus diameter from ≥ 21mm up to ≤ 27mm by CT or TEE
7. Patient willing to participate in the study and provides signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve or non-calcified
2. Extreme eccentricity of calcification
3. Severe mitral regurgitation (\> Grade 3)
4. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position and / or prosthetic ring
5. LV apex is not accessible via transapical access due to severe chest deformity
6. Previous surgery of the LV using a patch, such as the Dor procedure
7. Presence of apical LV thrombus
8. Calcified pericardium
9. Septal hypertrophy unacceptable for transapical procedure
10. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is contraindicated
11. ECHO evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
12. LVEF \< 20% by ECHO
13. Need for emergency intervention for any reason within 30 Days of scheduled procedure
14. Any percutaneous intervention, except for balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) within 1 month prior to implant procedure
15. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization within 30 days before or after the study procedure
16. Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month prior to implant procedure
17. Previous TIA or stroke within 6 months prior to implant procedure
18. Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to implant procedure
19. Scheduled surgical or percutaneous procedure to be performed prior to 30 day visit
20. History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, refusal of blood transfusions or severe anemia (Hb\<8 g/dL)
21. Systolic pressure \<80mmHg, cardiogenic shock, need for inotropic support or IABP
22. Primary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
23. Active infection or endocarditis
24. Hepatic failure (\> Child B)
25. Chronic renal dysfunction with serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL or renal dialysis
26. Neurological disease severely affecting ambulation, daily functioning, or dementia
27. Life expectancy \< 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
28. Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast media, or porcine tissue and allergy to nickel
29. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
30. For other severe illnesses of the patient (e.g. active carcinoma), the investigator shall decide on an individual basis whether the patient is not to be included in the study
31. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Symetis SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Markus Pr Schönburg, Prof.Dr.Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Abteilung Herzchirurgie Kerckhoff-Klinik

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kerckhoff-Klinik

Bad Nauheim, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhausbetriebsgesellschaft

Bad Oeynhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Deutsched Herzzentrum Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Martin Luther University Halle Winttenberg

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Herzentrum Leipzig GmbH

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Regensburg

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Conradi L, Hilker M, Kempfert J, Borgermann J, Treede H, Holzhey DM, Schrofel H, Kim WK, Schaefer U, Walther T. Prospective multicentre evaluation of a novel, low-profile transapical delivery system for self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 6-month outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):762-767. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy097.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29554265 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.