Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
18 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-12-19
2017-12-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective is to quantify and describe the three-dimensional kinematics for patients with a traditional medial SIGMA® High Performance Partial Knee System (functional ACL and tibial posterior slope matching the native bone) during these daily activities.
The secondary objective is to evaluate patients with the same medial UKA implant (SIGMA® High Performance Partial Knee System) in an ACL deficient knee, where the UKA was implanted at a 50% reduced tibial posterior slope relative to the native knee.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Knee Arthroplasty Videofluoroscopy
NCT03033940
10 Year Outcome of Total Knee Replacement (TKR) Using Sigma Prosthesis
NCT01522781
Computer-Assisted Total Knee Replacement Kinematics: DePuy Sigma Posterior Cruciate Substituting Knee and the DePuy Sigma RP Rotating Platform Knee
NCT00375856
Comprehensive Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System
NCT02156011
Kinematic Analysis of a PS, FB Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (ATTUNE Knee System) Using Dynamic RSA
NCT02323386
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Traditional UKA
Patients with a traditional Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty, SIGMA® High Performance Partial Knee System (functional ACL and tibial posterior slope matching the native bone) will undergo observational use of fluoroscopy to analyze joint kinematics
Observational use of fluoroscopy
Minimal radiation exposure (0.17 mSv) for observational purpose
Group 2: ACL deficient UKA
Patients with the same medial UKA implant (SIGMA® High Performance Partial Knee System) in an ACL deficient knee, where the UKA was implanted at a 50% reduced tibial posterior slope relative to the native knee will undergo observational use of fluoroscopy to analyze joint kinematics.
Observational use of fluoroscopy
Minimal radiation exposure (0.17 mSv) for observational purpose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Observational use of fluoroscopy
Minimal radiation exposure (0.17 mSv) for observational purpose
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intact/functional ACL
* BMI ≤ 32
* good clinical outcome, KOOS \>70
* no or very low pain VAS \< 2
* Follow-up at least one year post-op
* Standardized general health survey score (SF-12) within the normal range for people in their age group
* Age ≥ 18 years
* medial SIGMA® High Performance Partial Knee System due to medial OA
* Deficient / non-functional ACL
* Central to posterior wear of medial tibial plateau (pre-op MRI)
* 50% reduced tibial posterior slope after UKA (post-op radiograph)
* BMI ≤ 32
* good clinical outcome, KOOS \>70
* no or very low pain VAS \< 2
* Follow-up at least one year post-op
* Standardized general health survey score (SF-12) within the normal range for people in their age group
* Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Misaligned UKA
* Deficient / non-functional ACL (Lachman Test)
* Any other arthroplasty at the lower extremities
* Patient incapable to understand and sign informed consent
* Incapable of performing the motion tasks
* Pregnancy
* Actual significant problem on lower extremities
* Misaligned UKA / non-reduced posterior tibial slope (post-op radiograph)
* Intact / functional ACL
* Any other arthroplasty at the lower extremities
* Patient incapable to understand and sign informed consent
* Incapable of performing the motion tasks
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Schulthess Klinik
OTHER
DePuy Synthes
INDUSTRY
Gelenkzentrum Zurich
UNKNOWN
Stephen Ferguson
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen Ferguson
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen Ferguson, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UKA V 2.4 02.09.2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.