Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Contraception
NCT ID: NCT02945670
Last Updated: 2020-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
64 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-02
2017-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population
NCT03486743
Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Post-abortion LARC Uptake.
NCT03214848
Cluster, Randomized Trial on Long Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Education and Training
NCT01360216
Long Term and Permanent Contraceptive
NCT04672304
A Complex Contraception Registry
NCT02219269
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recordings were transcribed and de-identified. The resulting texts were coded by a team. Concepts and themes that arose from the coding were analyzed to inform the development of a survey on the topic of perspectives on contraception.
Qualitative analysis of the transcripts and coding was carried out and results were shared in pubic fora.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focus Group
We had recruited 64 women and completed 7 focus group sessions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-45 years
* Not pregnant
Exclusion Criteria
* Male
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeannette E. South-Paul
Andrew W. Mathieson UPMC Professor and Chair
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeannette E. South-Paul, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Latterman Family Health Center
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States
New Kensington Family Health Center
New Kensington, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Matilda Theiss Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Squirrel Hill Family Practice
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC Bloomfiled-Garfield FHC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Lawrenceville Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Shadyside Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G, Loyola Briceno AC, Jatlaoui T, Barfield W; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services-United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 10;64(13):363-9.
Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
Damle LF, Gohari AC, McEvoy AK, Desale SY, Gomez-Lobo V. Early initiation of postpartum contraception: does it decrease rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 5.
Okpo E, Allerton L, Brechin S. 'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003.
Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1450.
Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003.
Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Berenson AB. The use of effective contraception among young Hispanic women: the role of acculturation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
Doescher MP, Saver BG, Franks P, Fiscella K. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1156-63. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1156.
Kissling E, Valenciano M, Larrauri A, Oroszi B, Cohen JM, Nunes B, Pitigoi D, Rizzo C, Rebolledo J, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Jimenez-Jorge S, Horvath JK, Daviaud I, Guiomar R, Necula G, Bella A, O'Donnell J, Gluchowska M, Ciancio BC, Nicoll A, Moren A. Low and decreasing vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3) in 2011/12 among vaccination target groups in Europe: results from the I-MOVE multicentre case-control study. Euro Surveill. 2013 Jan 31;18(5):20390. doi: 10.2807/ese.18.05.20390-en.
Lin C, South-Paul JE, Maier JS, deBorja L, Al Aaraj Y, Burley C, Mena J,.Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population. North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting - NOV 2017 / Montreal, QB (https://www.napcrg.org/conferences/43/sessions/20937)
Cuddeback M, Ifthikhar R, Narayanan A. Assessment of Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Reversible Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population. North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting - Toronto, ON / NOV. 2019. (https://www.napcrg.org/conferences/2001/sessions/770)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Merck IIS# 55000
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.