Validating Three Common Occupational Therapy Assessments in Participants With Schizophrenia

NCT ID: NCT02930083

Last Updated: 2016-10-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To improve activities of daily living (ADL) and social functions is the important treatment plans and goals in participants with schizophrenia. Precise and effective measures of ADL and social functions are critical for clinicians to set up appropriate treatments plans, follow up participants' changes, and understand participants' progress. Three common measures of ADL and social functions used in participants with schizophrenia were the Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (COTES), the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale third ed. (ADLRS-3), and the Social Functioning Scale. To investigators' knowledge, psychometric properties of these assessments have not been examined in participants with schizophrenia. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to (1) examine internal consistency and construct validity of these 3 assessments (the COTES, the ADLRS-3, and the Social Functioning Scale); and (2) calculate missing rate of self-report assessment (the ADLRS-3 and the Social Functioning Scale). Investigators expect that these results of internal consistency, construct validity and/or missing rate will provide empirical evidence for using these three measures in both clinical and research setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Social dysfunction is one of the main characteristics of participants with schizophrenia and influences participants' daily functions and quality of life. The Social Functioning Scale-Taiwan short form (SFST) is commonly used to measure social function in participants with schizophrenia. However, no study has examined psychometric properties of the SFST in participants with schizophrenia exclusively. Therefore, the study aimed to examine missing rate, ceiling effect/floor effect, internal consistency, and convergent validity of the SFST in participants with schizophrenia. Investigators obtained schizophrenic self-report data (the SFST and the ADLRS-3) from occupational therapy records. The Chinese version of the Activities of Daily Living Rating Scale (ADLRS-3), which has 10 domains, is commonly used for assessing activities of daily living (ADL) in participants with schizophrenia. However, construct validity (i.e., unidimensionality) for each domain of the ADLRS-3 is unknown, limiting the explanations of the test results. From occupational therapy records, investigators obtained self-report data of the ADLRS-3. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the 10 one-factor structures. If a domain showed an insufficient model fit, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to investigate the factor structure and choose one factor representing the original construct. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Ceiling and floor effects were determined by the percentage of participants with the maximum and minimum scores in each domain, respectively. To evaluate construct validity (i.e., unidimensionality and convergent validity) and Rasch reliability of the Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (COTES) in participants with schizophrenia. From occupational therapy records, investigators collected COTES data of participants with schizophrenia. The 20-item COTES contains three subscales. For construct validity, investigators first examined the unidimensionality of each subscale using Rasch analysis. After unidimensionality was supported, investigators examined convergent validity using Pearson's r and Rasch reliability of the individual subscales in unidimensional and multidimensional approaches.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosed with schizophrenia

Exclusion Criteria

* participants who had a history of severe brain injury
* diagnoses of mental retardation or substance abuse
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LEE SHU CHUN

Occupational Therapist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OT-3tools-2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Peer-led Psycho-education for Schizophrenia
NCT03246932 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA