Comparison of Two Electroencephalograms (EEG) Monitors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT02928172

Last Updated: 2024-05-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-02

Study Completion Date

2023-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypothesis:

There is a statistically measurable correlation between qNOX and rough clinical signs of insufficient anti-nociception such as movements during Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion, skin Incision, LMA removal. It will reduce the problem of anticipating the nociception in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Objectives:

1. to compare two indexes of hypnosis, the qCON (Quantium Medical, Spain) with the Bispectral index (BIS™) (Covidien, Boulder CO. USA), in patients undergoing surgery under sedation and general anesthesia.
2. to assess the qNOX index of pain/nociception (Quantium Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and the qCON index of hypnosis.
3. to assess qNOX reliability as a specific indicator of response to nociceptive stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Monitoring the anti-nociceptive drug effect is useful because a sudden and strong nociceptive stimulus may result in untoward autonomic responses and muscular reflex movements. Unopposed stimulation may also 'overrule' a state of stable unconsciousness, with resultant awakening and awareness. The traditional clinical use of systolic or mean blood pressure is actually still one of the methods in everyday use for this monitoring purpose. Another cornerstone is the experience of which drugs and doses are effective in attenuating nociception. Alpiger and colleagues found that simple end-tidal monitoring of sevoflurane was a better predictor of nociceptive response than Auditory Evoked Potential.

Thus, monitoring the state of anti-nociception with objective, non-clinical methods is still in a state of testing and development, without well-documented and proven methods for consistent 'no-fuss' clinical daily use. Some methods, like those using systolic blood pressure, are based on the reduced sympathetic response from the Central Nervous System (CNS) when in a state of drug-induced anti-nociception during concomitant surgical stress. These include the pulse plethysmogram amplitude, heart rate variability and/or amplitude, pupillometry, muscle tonus and skin conductance.They all have limitations in interpretation, as the state of sympathetic tone is strongly influenced by numerous factors, including hypovolemia, vasopressors, atropine and patient positioning. In addition, sympathetic tone is very unspecific in the awake or lightly sedated patient, as mood and subjective feelings have a strong impact.

Attempts are also been made on using the EEG for monitoring of anti-nociception. This approach has been challenged as difficult, as most of the antinociceptive drugs effects are in the periphery, the medullary cord or deeper cerebral layers, far from the EEG signals derived from the frontal cortex. However, EEG is a 'mirror' of what is going on in other parts of the CNS and peripheral nervous system. One problem is to elucidate how the EEG signals may be used in a sensitive and specific way to reflect anti-nociception. Concepts such as response-entropy, Composite Variability Index and BIS variability score have been tested and launched.

Quantium Medical has an EEG-based algorithm with two outputs: the qCON for unconsciousness and the qNOX for anti-nociception. This means that calculates and displays two indices. One, the qCON, is designed to provide information about the depth of the hypnotic state, similar to that provided by the BIS™ and Sedline™ monitor (Masimo, Irvine CA). The second index, the qNOX, is designed to provide information about the depth of the antinociceptive state. The qCON has shown a comparable performance with BIS, and qNOX has proved correlation with rough clinical signs of insufficient antinociception, such as movements during LMA insertion, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Deep Sedation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Depth of Anesthesia

Subjects will have the qCON-qNOX and BIS monitor

Group Type OTHER

qCON-qNOX

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each subject will have the qCON-qNOX monitor on his/her forehead + the BIS monitor

BIS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each subject will have the BIS monitor on his/her forehead + the qCON-qNOX monitor

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

qCON-qNOX

Each subject will have the qCON-qNOX monitor on his/her forehead + the BIS monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

BIS

Each subject will have the BIS monitor on his/her forehead + the qCON-qNOX monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled to undergo general surgical procedures with general anesthesia/LMA.
* Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document.
* 18 - 80 years of age.
* ASA Class I - III adults of either sex

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to consent
* Withdrawal criteria
* Electrodes should be changed when patient's skin impedance value exceeds 15 kΩ after conditioning skin properly. If after two changes of electrodes, impedance remains above 15 kΩ, patient will be excluded from the present study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roya Yumul, M.D.,PhD.

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roya Yumul, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00043738

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ketamine and Propofol NeuroImaging
NCT07294092 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1