Comparing an Operation to Monitoring, With or Without Endocrine Therapy (COMET) Trial For Low Risk DCIS

NCT ID: NCT02926911

Last Updated: 2026-01-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

997 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-22

Study Completion Date

2030-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study looks at the risks and benefits of active monitoring (AM) compared to surgery in the setting of a pragmatic prospective randomized trial for low risk DCIS. Our overarching hypothesis is that management of low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) using an AM approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting from mammographic screening have been estimated to be as high as 1 in 4 patients diagnosed with breast cancer although the absence of standard definitions for measuring overdiagnosis has led to much uncertainty around this estimate. The national health care expenditure resulting from false positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnosis has been estimated to approach $4 billion annually. There is general consensus that much of this burden derives from the treatment of DCIS; for those estimated 40,000 women per year whose DCIS may never have progressed even without treatment, medical intervention can only harm. In those women who undergo surgical management of DCIS, there is risk of developing persistent pain at the surgical site, with estimates ranging from 25-68%. Importantly, persistent pain after lumpectomy may be as prevalent as that after total mastectomy. Persistent postsurgical pain is rated by patients as the most troubling symptom, leading to disability and psychological distress, and is often resistant to management. Although prospective population-based data have demonstrated significant patient and surgical focus on pain with remarkably high levels of chronic pain 4 and 9 months after breast surgery, much of these data have been collected in women with invasive cancer, with little data directly relevant to patients with DCIS.

The overarching hypothesis of the study is that management of low-risk DCIS using an active monitoring (AM) approach does not yield inferior cancer or quality of life outcomes compared to surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

DCIS Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgery

DCIS - Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 12 months x 5 years usual care for recurrent disease)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy

Active Monitoring

DCIS - Choice for endocrine therapy (MMG q 6 months x 5 years GCC for invasive progression)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active Monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Choice for endocrine therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery

Surgery +/- radiation choice for endocrine therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Active Monitoring

Choice for endocrine therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of unilateral, bilateral, unifocal, multifocal, or multicentric DCIS without invasive breast cancer (date of diagnosis defined as the date of the first pathology report that diagnosed the patient with DCIS) OR: atypia verging on DCIS OR: DCIS + LCIS (mix and/or separate locations in the same breast)
* A patient who has had a lumpectomy or partial mastectomy with margins positive for DCIS (i.e. \<2mm/ink on tumor) as part of their treatment for a current DCIS diagnosis is also eligible (post-excision bilateral mammogram required at enrollment to establish a new baseline)
* No previous DCIS or invasive breast cancer in ipsilateral breast 5 years prior to current DCIS diagnosis
* 40 years of age or older at time of DCIS diagnosis
* ECOG performance status 0 or 1
* No contraindication for surgery
* Baseline imaging (must include dimensions):

* Unilateral DCIS: contralateral normal mammogram ≤ 6 months of registration and ipsilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include ipsilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI)
* Bilateral DCIS: bilateral breast imaging ≤ 120 days of registration (must include bilateral mammogram; can also include ultrasound or breast MRI)
* DCIS s/p lumpectomy: post excision mammogram on side of excision ≤ 60 days of registration
* Pathologic criteria:

* Any grade I DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis)
* Any grade II DCIS (irrespective of necrosis/comedonecrosis)
* Absence of invasion or microinvasion
* Diagnosis of DCIS confirmed on core needle biopsy, vacuum-assisted or surgery ≤ 120 days of registration
* ER(+) and/or PR(+) by IHC (≥ 10% staining or Allred score ≥ 4) unless atypia verging on DCIS in which case biomarker criterion does not apply
* HER2 0, 1+, or 2+ by IHC if HER2 testing is performed
* Histology slides reviewed and agreement between two clinical pathologists (not required to be at same institution) that pathology fulfills COMET eligibility criteria. In cases of disagreement between the two pathology reviews about whether or not a case fulfills the eligibility criteria, a third pathology review will be required.
* At least two sites of biopsy for those cases where individual mammographic extent of calcifications exceeds 4 cm, with second biopsy benign or both sites fulfilling pathology eligibility criteria (ER/PR testing required for second biopsy)
* Amenable to follow up examinations
* Ability to read, understand and evaluate study materials and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
* Reads and speaks Spanish or English

Exclusion Criteria

* Male DCIS
* Grade III DCIS
* Concurrent diagnosis of invasive or microinvasive breast cancer in either breast
* Documented mass on examination or mass/hypoechoic area on imaging at site of DCIS prior to biopsy yielding diagnosis of DCIS, with exception of: subsequent lumpectomy or partial mastectomy (with positive DCIS margins i.e. \<2mm/ink on tumor) followed by a post-surgery MMG; fibroadenoma at a distinct/separate site from site of DCIS; or diagnosis of mass/hypoechoic area as a cyst or a papilloma. In cases of uncertainty about whether the mass was present on physical examination prior to biopsy, the following criteria should be applied: if mammogram noting abnormal findings is diagnostic MMG = symptomatic/if mammogram noting abnormal findings is screening MMG = asymptomatic. If a patient has a mass on imaging that is biopsied (worked-up) and does not show invasive breast cancer, they are eligible. If a patient has a mass on initial MMG that is not seen on subsequent MMG, they are eligible (if initial mass occurred due to additional work-up).
* Any color/bloody nipple discharge (ipsilateral breast)
* Mammographic finding of BIRADS 4 or greater within 6 months prior to registration at site of breast other than that of known DCIS, without pathologic assessment
* Use of investigational cancer agents within 6 weeks prior to diagnosis of DCIS
* Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric, or other existing condition that would prevent compliance with the trial or consent process
* Pregnancy. If a woman has been confirmed as pregnant, she will not be eligible to take part in the trial. If she suspects there is a chance that she may be pregnant, a pregnancy test should be undertaken, although a pregnancy test for all women of child-bearing potential is not mandatory. In addition, if a woman becomes pregnant once registered to the trial, she can continue to be followed (endocrine therapy is not a mandatory requirement of the study)
* Documented history of prior tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, or raloxifene use in the 6 months prior to registration
* Current use of exogenous hormones (i.e. oral progesterone)
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rising Tide Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shelley Hwang, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Ann Partridge, MD, MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Alastair Thompson, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Baylor College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Providence Alaska Medical Center

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

City of Hope

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Memorial Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center

Vallejo, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Cancer Research Program

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph Hospital- Cancer Centers of Colorado

Lafayette, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Memorial Healthcare System

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Hawaii Cancer Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Kootenai Health

Post Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

NorthShore University HealthSystem-Evanston Hospital

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Harvey, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Cancer Care

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

OSF Saint Anthony Medical Center

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates - Des Moines

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Cancer Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

St. Elizabeth Healthcare Edgewood

Edgewood, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Eastern Maine Medical Center Cancer Care

Brewer, Maine, United States

Site Status

Maine Center for Cancer Medicine-Scarborough

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

New England Cancer Specialists

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

Anne Arundel Medical Center

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland - Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Beaumont NCORP

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Metro MN Community Oncology Research Consortium (MMCORC)

Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Washington University - Siteman Cancer Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Community Hospital of Anaconda

Anaconda, Montana, United States

Site Status

Billings Clinic

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Bozeman Health

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Benefis Sletten Cancer Institute

Great Falls, Montana, United States

Site Status

Kalispell Regional Medical Center

Kalispell, Montana, United States

Site Status

Community Medical Center

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New Hampshire Oncology Hematology PA

Hooksett, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Englewood Hospital and Medical Center

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Atlantic Health System / Morristown Medical Center

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Jersey Shore University Medical Center

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Valley Hospital - Luckow Pavilion

Paramus, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care at Montefiore Medical Park

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Levine Cancer Institute

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cape Fear Valley Health System

Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Medical Oncology Center

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cone Health Cancer Center

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novant Health Breast Surgery - Greensboro

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolina East Medical Center

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rex Cancer Center

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Strecker Cancer Center - Belpre

Belpre, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton Physicians-Miami Valley Hospital South

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mount Carmel East Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus Oncology & Hematology INC

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Riverside Methodist Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Grant Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

MidOhio Oncology Hematology, Mark H. Zangmeister Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mount Carmel West Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Doctors Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton Physicians-Miami Valley Hospital North

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Grady Hospital

Delaware, Ohio, United States

Site Status

OhioHealth Grady - Delaware Health Center

Delaware, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Armes Family Cancer Center

Findlay, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton Physicians-Atrium

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Wayne Hospital

Greenville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering Medical Center

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

OhioHealth Mansfield Hospital

Mansfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Marietta Memorial Hospital

Marietta, Ohio, United States

Site Status

OhioHealth Marion General Hospital

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Licking Memorial Hospital

Newark, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Ann's Hospital

Westerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Genesis Health Care System

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cancer Centers of Southwest Oklahoma

Lawton, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Saint Charles Health System

Bend, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Guthrie Medical Group PC-Robert Packer Hospital

Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

WellSpan Health York Cancer Center

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Georgetown Hospital System

Georgetown, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville Memorial Hospital

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Baptist Cancer Care

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

UT Southwestern/Simmons Cancer Center-Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Doctors Hospital of Laredo

Laredo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

The University of Vermont Medical Center

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University Medicine

Morgantown, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Overlake Hospital Medical Center

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center -Appleton

Appleton, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Burlington, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Center - Fond du Lac

Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Germantown Health Center

Germantown, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Grafton, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Saint Vincent Hospital

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

BayCare Aurora LLC, Aurora Cancer Care

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Bay Area Medical Group - Cancer Care Clinic

Marinette, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Marinette, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic of Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Racine, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Sheboygan, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Summit, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Two Rivers, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Aurora Health Care, Aurora Cancer Care

West Allis, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12381707 (View on PubMed)

Erbas B, Provenzano E, Armes J, Gertig D. The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9101-z. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16319971 (View on PubMed)

Ozanne EM, Shieh Y, Barnes J, Bouzan C, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Characterizing the impact of 25 years of DCIS treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug;129(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1430-5. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21390494 (View on PubMed)

Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8096941 (View on PubMed)

Partridge AH, Hyslop T, Rosenberg SM, Bennett AV, Drier S, Jonsson M, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Lynch T, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Darai S, Carey L, Thompson A, Hwang ES; COMET Study Consortium. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Secondary Analysis of the COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):300-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6556.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39665588 (View on PubMed)

Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Ryser MD, Weiss A, Wolf A, Norris K, Witten M, Grimm L, Schnitt S, Badve S, Factor R, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Watson MA, West R, Davies L, Donovan JL, Shimada A, Li Y, Li Y, Bennett AV, Rosenberg S, Marks J, Winer E, Boisvert M, Giuliano A, Larson KE, Yost K, McAuliffe PF, Krie A, Tamirisa N, Carey LA, Thompson AM, Partridge AH; COMET Study Investigators. Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39665585 (View on PubMed)

Ozanne EM, Maves K, Tramontano AC, Lynch T, Thompson A, Partridge A, Frank E, Collyar D, Basila D, Pinto D, Hyslop T, Ryser MD, Rosenberg S, Hwang ES, Punglia RS. Impact of an online decision support tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using a pre-post design (AFT-25). Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 17;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01891-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39289750 (View on PubMed)

Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, Frank E, Pinto D, Basila D, Collyar D, Bennett A, Kaplan C, Rosenberg S, Thompson A, Weiss A, Partridge A. The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 12;9(3):e026797. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30862637 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AFT-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.